.: Played Games
Playoffs Division 1the Viper Squad vs Slackers
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-01-10 Comments: 17 Today: 0
the Viper Squad-Slackers 218-186 @ DM3
the Viper Squad-Slackers 266-188 @ E1M2
the Viper Squad-Slackers 227-210 @ DM2
17
Playoffs Division 2boefje vs Dies Ater
2 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-13 Comments: 8 Today: 0
boefje-Dies Ater 182-98 @ DM3
boefje-Dies Ater 0-0 @ DM2
boefje-Dies Ater 211-125 @ CMT3
8
Playoffs Division 3ChoseN vs Magnum 44
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-22 Comments: 8 Today: 0
ChoseN-Magnum 44 169-116 @ DM3
ChoseN-Magnum 44 222-152 @ E1M2
ChoseN-Magnum 44 285-7 @ CMT1B
ChoseN-Magnum 44 159-167 @ DM2
8
Playoffs Division 3Teamkillers vs Satanic Slaughter Clan
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-20 Comments: 10 Today: 0
Teamkillers-Satanic Slaughter Clan 213-131 @ CMT1B
Teamkillers-Satanic Slaughter Clan 167-212 @ DM2
Teamkillers-Satanic Slaughter Clan 235-196 @ E1M2
Teamkillers-Satanic Slaughter Clan 214-137 @ DM3
10
Playoffs Division 1Slackers vs Fragomatic
2 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-19 Comments: 80 Today: 0
Slackers-Fragomatic 218-107 @ CMT1B
Slackers-Fragomatic 233-218 @ E1M2
80
Playoffs Division 4Clan Cube Squad vs Paras
2 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-16 Comments: 12 Today: 0
Clan Cube Squad-Paras 167-177 @ E1M2
Clan Cube Squad-Paras 253-99 @ CMT3
Clan Cube Squad-Paras 186-84 @ CMT1B
12
Playoffs Division 4Comfortably Numb vs Fallen Angels
2 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-15 Comments: 4 Today: 0
Comfortably Numb-Fallen Angels 241-67 @ DM3
Comfortably Numb-Fallen Angels 195-87 @ CMT1B
4
Playoffs Division 3Satanic Slaughter Clan vs Magnum 44
2 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-15 Comments: 4 Today: 0
Satanic Slaughter Clan-Magnum 44 136-166 @ DM2
Satanic Slaughter Clan-Magnum 44 241-156 @ E1M2
Satanic Slaughter Clan-Magnum 44 191-129 @ CMT3
4
Playoffs Division 4Mob of Oddballs vs Fallen Angels
0 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-14 Comments: 5 Today: 0
Mob of Oddballs-Fallen Angels 124-170 @ E1M2
Mob of Oddballs-Fallen Angels 90-157 @ CMT1B
5
Playoffs Division 1the Viper Squad vs USSR
2 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2009-12-13 Comments: 24 Today: 0
the Viper Squad-USSR 315-71 @ DM3
the Viper Squad-USSR 287-129 @ E1M2
24
.: Upcoming games
No matches have been played so far.
.: sNBa vs Paras
Division 4Reported: 2009-11-02 21:18 - Game cancelledWeek: 1
.: Played Maps
DM2 - Claustrophobolis
sNBa: 314Paras: 20
16.jpg
Submitted data
ADDD93
smg84
ekz71
conus66
Domin8
Juho5
Panjabi4
Heag3
Map Statistics:
No statistics availible

DM3 - The Abandoned Base
sNBa: 222Paras: 11
17.jpg
Submitted data
smg65
ekz54
ADDD52
conus51
Juho6
Domin5
Panjabi1
Heag-1
Map Statistics:
No statistics availible

.: Comments
Pages: 1 | Previous Next | Total of 19 comments | First Last comment first

#1 2009-11-02 22:07 by 1tsinen (91.150.53.XXX)

Next time use nicks that are registered in the roster.

#2 2009-11-03 00:27 by Stev (86.41.149.XXX)

I think it's safe to say that sNBa are very strong for a div4 side; Perhaps too strong, but there's always one team that slips past the seeding in every div.

#3 2009-11-03 08:18 by Kwibus (92.70.200.XXX)

Yeh it's not odd when teams slips past the seeding when people use fakenicks.

Imo you might as well kick the team out of the league, but let's not do that.
Maybe putting them in div3 would be nice. There is allready quite a big difference in div4, but now sNBa seems to be even much better then the other ' good ' teams in div4 which is a bit retarded.

We (CN) will rape some newb teams and that's not very nice for the newer teams, but there are more teams like CN. sTa/FA/CCS, maybe pipedope. Then again we and these other teams I mentioned probably end up bottom in div3 so it makes sense they are in div4.
Now there is a team that will probably even rape the other 'topdiv4' teams.

gg smala and ryzzen.


And yeh ofcourse I whine coz now our little chance of winning the div is over :D

#4 2009-11-03 08:49 by Conus (198.208.243.XXX)

Fakenicks? Smg / Smala_greger / Smala are the nicks I've seen him use and that's even before I ever played with or against him.

ADDD is Ryzzen - so what? he sucks :p Seriously tho.. He changed nick (like Sir Jaedong) but didn't get as much attention to it. He hasn't been hiding that he is ryzzen when ppl ask "WHO IS ADDD?"

And for us to survive in div3? Maybe end up 3rd from the bottom (at best).. we have pracced CSN and CMF with quite bad results

#5 2009-11-03 09:52 by Hooraytio (85.228.255.XXX)

This debate (misplaced clans) is as old as the division system.

1. there will always be a winner of each division
2. that said winner might have been misplaced
3. there will always be a clan ending last
4. that clan might have been misplaced

This doesnt change the fact that there would have been another winner and loser of that division if those 2 clans where removed. Is a clan misplaced just because it starts out the season with 2 wins? Snba havent even played vs CN yet which is another strong clan in div4.

When saying that snba wouldnt survive in div3, by that you mean that the clan would lose too many games and quit?

Each season the admins must make a decision about all the clans and ever since the division system was introduced there has been some major or minor error resulting in many or a handful quite boring games.

The solution to this could be to have a preseason ladder with all the participating teams to decide their skill lvl but ofc this suggestion has some flaws as well:

1. Time: The ladder would steal time from the real season making it hard to end the season before x-mas/summer depending on time of year.

2. Consistency: The qw scene is in a constant state of change and far too many clans are very short lived making it hard for the admins to keep track. Also during/after the ladder som clans would vanish and new would be formed. Would the new clans be allowed in the season without playing the ladder?

3. Recruiting: A new player can heavily alter a clans skill level and make it hard to place it accordingly even if it did participate in the ladder.

4. Faking: A clan could fake their skill level during ladder play to end up in a lower division.

As it is now the admins try to determine each clans skill level and place them accordingly and i think it is good enough even tho some clans slip into the wrong division.

Other solutions?

#6 2009-11-03 12:36 by Kwibus (92.70.200.XXX)

p.s. Don't get me wrong. I don't blame the admins. Maybe I don't blame anyone. Who knows maybe we can beat sNBa, but I doubt it. I think they are actually quite a bit stronger then us.
It's a bit lame of me to whine about it as we are also a team thats hard to place allthough I do think we should be in div4.

But they raped paras so badly while paras ain't even imo a bottom team with their recent additions. And they also owned sTa pretty badly... a team of which we thought was a title contender.

But enough whine now :D

#7 2009-11-03 12:39 by Domin (91.153.71.XXX)

Smala in div4, what a joke :>
gg anyway

#8 2009-11-03 14:09 by Hooraytio (85.228.255.XXX)

yeah i was just trying to come up with some new ideas about clan placement :P

i dont think 197-100 (snba-sta) on dm2 is an ownage tho ;)

#9 2009-11-03 14:37 by TheEvilDog (90.231.124.XXX)

DIV0 SMALA SO GOOD!!!!!!

#10 2009-11-03 15:16 by Panjabi (193.167.107.XXX)

Maybe there should be own div to our clan.. :)

#11 2009-11-03 16:15 by ADDD (81.234.162.XXX)

WHO IS ADDD???

#12 2009-11-04 00:31 by VVD (194.186.220.XXX)

> i dont think 197-100 (snba-sta) on dm2 is an ownage tho ;)
dm2 is home map for sta :-]
197-100 is rape for home map

#13 2009-11-04 00:32 by VVD (194.186.220.XXX)

Fogot to add AFAIK

#14 2009-11-04 02:44 by lib (85.229.255.XXX)

JMK-players fakenicking and raping newbies?

i'm shocked, SHOCKED.

#15 2009-11-04 07:46 by Hooraytio (85.228.250.XXX)

#1
+97 frags in a 4on4 game is never a rape no matter what map it is. you are weirder than zaq who called +123 frags a rape during nqr11...

#16 2009-11-04 07:46 by Hooraytio (85.228.250.XXX)

#12 even...

#17 2009-11-04 09:16 by Darff (193.130.68.XXX)

Ah yes I remember zaqrape, that cracked me up

Wouldn't sNBa enjoy the competition in div3 though, so it'd make everyone happy if they were simply moved over... ?

#18 2009-11-04 14:18 by zero (195.56.54.XXX)

OMG SMALA RAJP!

#19 2009-11-04 15:17 by smala (194.236.219.XXX)

<3


Showing Page 1 of 1
A total of 19 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Verification imageCode from image aboveNameComment
.: Poll
There are no polls.
Poll list
.: Menu
Content
  • News
  • Forum
  • Players
  • Teams
  • Played Games
  • Statistics - Frags
  • Statistics - Maps
  • News archive
  • Admins
  • Rules
Divisions
  • Division 1
  • Division 2
  • Division 3
  • Division 4
  • Playoffs Division 1
  • Playoffs Division 2
  • Playoffs Division 3
  • Playoffs Division 4
.: Columns
  • (08 Nov) zappater
.: Seasons
  • European Quake League 1
  • European Quake League 2
  • European Quake League 3
  • European Quake League 4
  • European Quake League 5
  • European Quake League 6
  • European Quake League 7
  • European Quake League 8
  • European Quake League 9
  • European Quake League 10
  • European Quake League 11
  • European Quake League 12
  • European Quake League 13
  • European Quake League 14
.: External
    Get Started
  • nQuake
    News & Stuff
  • Quakeworld.nu
  • Quakeworld.ru
  • Quaddicted
  • Besmella-Quake
  • Challenge-TV
  • Quake Servers
  • Goldrush (betting)
    Tournaments
  • Ownage Duel Tournament
  • QuakeWorld Duel League
Additional work done by PreMorteM and Zalon.
If you want to use any material on this site you'll have to contact Åke Vader.
All material on this site is copyrighted and protected by law.