#1 2009-12-13 23:12 by Kalma (88.115.44.XXX)

We had two QW crashes on e1m2 :(

ggs gl

#2 2009-12-13 23:20 by Stev (83.71.83.XXX)

DM2 was a solid performance by csn as usual, while CMT1B featured a good start from them despite their inexperience.

Nothing can be said about e1m2 that could make it alright. Two separate timeouts by csn players irreparably tainted the game regardless of who was going to win.

Best of luck in the consolation final and next season.

#3 2009-12-13 23:42 by Hooraytio (83.233.83.XXX)

ggs

not much of a chance with 2 guys getting videocard errors midgame...

gl in the finals

#4 2009-12-13 23:59 by Flamer (88.101.137.XXX)

Ye it was sad @ e1m2 :( and we had RL with pyta :(

GGs anyway tks! GL in final!

#5 2009-12-14 11:28 by Kwibus (92.70.200.XXX)

Would a pause option have helped Hooray? :D

gg both

#6 2009-12-14 12:15 by JohnNy_cz (78.128.193.XXX)

"I dont like the idea with pausing the game. it is better that 1 player is gone for a little while than to stop the pace and flow of the game..."
Oh the irony...

#7 2009-12-14 12:32 by Hooraytio (85.228.243.XXX)

I still dont like pause, would have been better to restart the game if they had been gone longer. So no, dont make a pause feature please

#8 2009-12-14 12:49 by Hooraytio (85.228.243.XXX)

Besides, Pyta wouldnt have gotten his rl back after reconnecting anyway. When a player is disconnected for some reason the thing that matters is if he was stacked or not, not the actual time he was gone (unless it is several minutes).

What a pause would do is only to make sure that the game isnt played 4on3 for a long perioed of time. This is however inferior to the fact that the team lost 1 or more weapons due to the timeout/crash and this cant be helped by a pause anyway...

#9 2009-12-14 12:51 by Hooraytio (85.228.243.XXX)

Just because my team lost it doesnt mean that im gonna change my opinion on the pause issue. With that logic i would also change my view on cmt1b after winning vs osams on it.

#10 2009-12-14 13:31 by junkass (193.167.190.XXX)

GGs tks, good luck in the finals! Pyta was hot btw :>

#11 2009-12-14 14:08 by Kalma (88.115.44.XXX)

It's our problem if we have people timing out. Opponent shouldn't have to make any concessions, like pausing. It's a competition.

Maybe something could be improved to make swapping players more fluent.

#12 2009-12-14 20:00 by Stev (83.71.83.XXX)

We can't play without some kind of drama, can we. <3

#13 2009-12-14 20:07 by fern (85.144.181.XXX)

i get it hooraytio you have an opinion :)))))

#14 2009-12-14 20:34 by Hooraytio (83.233.83.XXX)

it is not drama to disagree about developing/implementing a new feature...

fern, as always, dont post when you have nothing of value to add :)

#15 2009-12-14 20:55 by Stev (83.71.83.XXX)

Sorry, I didn't mean to cause offense. I was only trying to say that something seems to crop up whenever we play, despite the games always being exciting and whine-free against polite and talented opponents. <3

#16 2009-12-15 08:16 by Kwibus (92.70.200.XXX)

Hehe Hooraytio. I just found it funny to come back to the pause discussion.
I was pretty convinced you wouldn't have changed your mind tho :)

And it's true... it won't give you back your rl.

#17 2009-12-16 15:27 by 1tsinen (91.153.49.XXX)

He plays ctf with us in TPA. Btw Kwibus, it was me you did play a couple a days ago :P

#18 2009-12-16 15:49 by Hooraytio (85.228.252.XXX)

What are you talking about Itsinen :D

#19 2009-12-17 13:59 by snapcase (217.140.115.XXX)

Think he ended up on the wrong page when replying. Seems to be the discussion from USSR-tVS comments about Milton and QL etc.

#20 2009-12-18 20:24 by 1tsinen (91.150.29.XXX)

Yep, it was, dunno how it got here since I haven't even read these comments before afaik :D

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Code from image aboveNameComment