Playoffs Division 1 | the Viper Squad vs Slackers | 3 - 0
| 17 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 2 | boefje vs Dies Ater | 2 - 1
| 8 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | ChoseN vs Magnum 44 | 3 - 1
| 8 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | Teamkillers vs Satanic Slaughter Clan | 3 - 1
| 10 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 1 | Slackers vs Fragomatic | 2 - 0
| 80 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 4 | Clan Cube Squad vs Paras | 2 - 1
| 12 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 4 | Comfortably Numb vs Fallen Angels | 2 - 0
| 4 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | Satanic Slaughter Clan vs Magnum 44 | 2 - 1
| 4 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 4 | Mob of Oddballs vs Fallen Angels | 0 - 2
| 5 | ||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 1 | the Viper Squad vs USSR | 2 - 0
| 24 |
CMT1B - Silverdome | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChoseN: 74 | Teamkillers: 251 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Map Statistics: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency awards goes to [tks]ddk for 76.9 effi RL Killer awards goes to [tks]ddk for 8 killed RLs Frag Streak awards goes to [tks]ddk for 27 frags in one streak Quadrunner awards goes to [tks]snapcase and [tks]ddk for 7 frags in one Quadrun Boomsticker awards goes to [tks]ddk for 41.9 shotgun percentage Aimer awards goes to [tks]squeeze for 16 direct rocket hits Annihilator awards goes to [tks]ddk for 9433 given damage View detailed map statistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DM2 - Claustrophobolis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ChoseN: 222 | Teamkillers: 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Map Statistics: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency awards goes to [csn]fl4m3r for 63.4 effi RL Killer awards goes to [csn]fl4m3r for 16 killed RLs Frag Streak awards goes to [tks]ddk and [csn]fl4m3r for 27 frags in one streak Quadrunner awards goes to [csn]fl4m3r for 9 frags in one Quadrun Boomsticker awards goes to [csn]Pyta for 41.9 shotgun percentage Aimer awards goes to [csn]hooraytio for 28 direct rocket hits Annihilator awards goes to [csn]Pyta for 11124 given damage View detailed map statistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DM3 - The Abandoned Base | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ChoseN: 107 | Teamkillers: 211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Map Statistics: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency awards goes to [tks]squeeze for 77 effi RL Killer awards goes to [tks]squeeze for 11 killed RLs Frag Streak awards goes to [tks]squeeze for 30 frags in one streak Quadrunner awards goes to [tks]en_karl for 6 frags in one Quadrun Boomsticker awards goes to [tks]snapcase for 43.9 shotgun percentage Aimer awards goes to [tks]squeeze for 20 direct rocket hits Annihilator awards goes to [tks]en_karl for 9283 given damage View detailed map statistics |
#1 2009-11-16 18:04 by Hooraytio (83.233.83.XXX)
This was a good match even though cmt1b was played.
Why do i say this then? Well some clans have the time to
prac a lot and some dont. This makes it very uneven when it
comes to practising new maps. Some may call me "kenya-hater"
or "conservative" but this is not true. I do enjoy a lot of
exmy maps and also maps like schloss, midcit and to some
extent grim. I would also like to try cmt2 for atleast 10
games since it felt pretty fun the two times i played it
some years ago.
Anyway, because we dont prac a lot we where ofccourse
obliterated on cmt1b, a map which TKS has made to their
homemap for this season. At first it felt like we could keep
up and the frag difference wasnt all that big. However, the
map didnt grow on us and TKS found their way around way
better than CSN. Their lead built up and the last 5-8
minutes was pretty much TKS gibbing away for the win.
On dm2 we got a good start, i held tele for some minutes,
and we fragged pretty ok. TKS did a good job getting rls and
finally took control over tele water. The game was close and
I almost won it for TKS when i teamkilled junkass just
before quad some time into the game. Despite this TKS
couldnt control the map and when i got my hands on a bored
rl i took my one and only quad and managed to kill 2-3 TKS
rl dudes and the map was pretty much ours from then on. We
could frag quite easily and win by a big margin.
On dm3 i left to get some food but checked in now and then.
CSN got a good start, TKS took over. Then CSN got mid-game
penta and it looked safe for a little while. However, CSN
didnt hold onto ra/quad and in the end TKS could win pretty
easy.
All in all it was a good game.
GL in the next games TKS.
#2 2009-11-16 23:52 by fern (85.144.181.XXX)
This was a good match even though dm2 was played.
Why do i say this then? Well some clans have had the time in
the past to prac a lot and some didn't because they started
months ago. This makes it very uneven when it comes to
playing old maps.
we're kenya noobs and you're tb3 pro's, i get it. ggs
#3 2009-11-17 01:32 by junkass (193.167.190.XXX)
This was a good match even though dm3 was played.
Why do i say this then? Well some clans have had ZERO time
in the past to prac a lot. This makes it very uneven when it
comes to playing DM3.
We're dm2 noobs and you're cmt1b pro's, i get it. ggs
;EEEEEEEEEEEEE
#4 2009-11-17 01:34 by junkass (193.167.190.XXX)
Ops...
That was a fucked-up post. Well, I meant we sucked at dm3
and you're cmt1b whores. ;S
#5 2009-11-17 07:59 by Hooraytio (85.228.241.XXX)
Yet again Fern failed to see the point... I dont hate new
maps, I just dont think cmt1b, cmt3 and cmt4 are very good
maps. There are other maps with more potential imo. Maybe
some maps without shaft? Without pent? Without RA? Yeah this
may sound like a remake of e1m2 but in all fairness why do
almost all new maps have to contain _all_ items? Perhaps a
map with 2xYA instead of ya+ra? Or try another map with 2
rls without it becoming a dm2 remake? Sometimes i see
complaints about DM3 being played _all the time_ in 4on4
mixes. But if thats so, why do the new maps so often have a
similar item layout? It is pretty damn weird to complain
about the old maps and then make new ones that plays almost
the same way...
Also, why add more maps if you cant even play the 3 existing
ones? :P
#6 2009-11-17 08:58 by Kalma (88.115.44.XXX)
If ya'll started QW just months ago I'm impressed.
Bra spelat.
#7 2009-11-17 12:10 by Darff (193.130.68.XXX)
This was a good match even though QW was played.
Why do i say this then? Well some matches in QW are really
one sided, won 2-0 easily, but this one was 2-1 which is
more exciting. We can thank the league admins for making
divisions which make the skill levels between opponents more
even, and the map pool too I guess for making the
possibilities for upsets more likely... though I'd still
rather just play TB3.
#8 2009-11-17 12:12 by Darff (193.130.68.XXX)
Ops...
That was a fucked-up post. Well, I meant I don't have time
to learn CMT, but objectively I guess it's a good thing that
advantage can be given to the most active & learning players
- cmt1b whores. ;S
#9 2009-11-17 12:41 by Hooraytio (85.228.241.XXX)
I dont think adding more maps is the best way to create
exciting games. It will just be even more one sided as some
clans cba to learn them and some clans will stay sucky at
some or all of the tb3 maps while trying to own on the new
maps...
#10 2009-11-17 12:55 by Hooraytio (85.228.241.XXX)
I have no interest in raping noobs on TB3. There are like
350+ players atleast who started after me and has become
better than me. Fog, Skillah, Murdoc, Mille and so on just
to name a few. Since players like these and others have
pracced a lot (some have amazing skill as well) they have
become good on TB3 as well as on other maps.
My team has always been in the middle/low part of the skill
ladder and quite often we have raped, won, lost and finally
become raped (in that order) by emerging teams and players
on TB3 maps. Usually the first map to lose vs a team like
this has been dm3 :)
The goal with wanting to play tb3 is not to stay on top with
some fuzzy idea of having better map knowledge or not
wanting to lose on some custom map versus rookies. Sure i
get pissed of when i lose but lets face it Im not gonna be
anywhere close to div1. I just want to have a good time
while playing and that is best accomplished on TB3 since i
only play 1-3 times per week 1-3 hours per game.
Id rather not play new maps, not because i think all of them
are bad because many are actually good, but because i dont
have the time needed to learn them. I know tb3 and thats
enough for me to have fun while playing. This is why i feel
clans should have the choice to play or skip new maps during
league play. Is this really such a shocking idea?
#11 2009-11-17 14:12 by dib (213.205.76.XXX)
LOL, drama mr horaytio?
#12 2009-11-17 14:50 by Hooraytio (85.228.245.XXX)
Learn to read before you call drama on every post mr
illiterate dib :)
#13 2009-11-17 15:30 by fern (85.144.181.XXX)
ugh, do you even know what you're typing anymore? i
shouldn't have replied in the first place, because you only
say that i "fail to see the point" time after time.
and nah kalma, only ddk and snapcase ;p
#14 2009-11-17 15:39 by Hooraytio (85.228.245.XXX)
Ofc I do, you on the other hand only turn to sarcasm, irony
and bad jokes time after another while completely missing
the point...
#15 2009-11-17 17:14 by rekk (62.78.154.XXX)
Everyone has a choice of doing whatever they want with their
free time. Some prefer playing more and training new maps
and some don't.
Imo it's useless to whine about fun aspects etc since there
are people who do play with more commitment and win because
of that.
#16 2009-11-17 17:58 by Hooraytio (83.233.83.XXX)
It will always be more fun to play if you feel you have
given your best on a map you know even when you lose.
Playing a new map vs a team that knows it way better is not
fun, ever. Thats the difference between fun and not fun, not
whether you win or lose.
#17 2009-11-17 19:17 by Stev (86.41.157.XXX)
I wonder how new players feel about playing dm3 against
veterans.
#18 2009-11-17 21:01 by Hooraytio (83.233.83.XXX)
I wonder how new players feel about playing football against
veterans.
#19 2009-11-18 07:41 by Kwibus (92.70.200.XXX)
You fail to see the point here Hooraytio :D
#20 2009-11-18 12:11 by Hooraytio (85.228.248.XXX)
I beg to differ... :)
However, Ill look into other maps that might be more fun
than the two extra we use currently. Lets see what next
nqr/eql can bring in terms of maps. There might be too many
followers of new maps to neglect but there should be some
better solution than to almost fully cater to their wishes.
It seems that some ppl find it fun and exciting with new
maps while some find it fun and exciting with old maps.
Since fun and not competition seems to be the main reason
for choosing tb3 or tb3+customs I see no flaw in using
opt-in. The ones who are into qw simply for the competition
are few these days and also tend to have a leaning against
tb3 only so the argument about making it more competetive by
adding maps isnt really valid. It is more about making it
more fun, for some.
#21 2009-11-18 16:01 by dev (195.22.110.XXX)
o_O who all these people?
#22 2009-11-18 16:02 by dev (195.22.110.XXX)
tks ok btw xD
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.