.: Played Games
Playoffs Division 1the Viper Squad vs Slackers
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-09 Comments: 40 Today: 0
the Viper Squad-Slackers 229-153 @ DM2
the Viper Squad-Slackers 192-200 @ DM3
the Viper Squad-Slackers 256-170 @ E1M2
the Viper Squad-Slackers 267-117 @ DM3
40
Playoffs Division 2Apocalypse 2000 vs Demolition Crew
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-09 Comments: 17 Today: 0
Apocalypse 2000-Demolition Crew 268-128 @ DM2
Apocalypse 2000-Demolition Crew 158-202 @ DM3
Apocalypse 2000-Demolition Crew 268-202 @ E1M2
Apocalypse 2000-Demolition Crew 203-148 @ DM3
17
Playoffs Division 3Bloodpunch vs osams
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-06 Comments: 16 Today: 0
Bloodpunch-osams 201-94 @ DM3
Bloodpunch-osams 167-139 @ DM2
Bloodpunch-osams 243-110 @ E1M2
16
Playoffs Division 3In A Blaze vs Fallen Angels
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-05 Comments: 16 Today: 0
In A Blaze-Fallen Angels 156-110 @ DM3
In A Blaze-Fallen Angels 128-164 @ DM2
In A Blaze-Fallen Angels 184-196 @ E1M2
In A Blaze-Fallen Angels 172-98 @ DM3
In A Blaze-Fallen Angels 199-150 @ DM2
16
Playoffs Division 3Bloodpunch vs In A Blaze
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-04 Comments: 8 Today: 0
Bloodpunch-In A Blaze 134-141 @ DM3
Bloodpunch-In A Blaze 188-149 @ DM2
Bloodpunch-In A Blaze 178-165 @ E1M2
Bloodpunch-In A Blaze 108-215 @ DM3
Bloodpunch-In A Blaze 203-196 @ E1M2
8
Playoffs Division 3osams vs Fallen Angels
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-03 Comments: 53 Today: 0
osams-Fallen Angels 219-44 @ DM3
osams-Fallen Angels 216-114 @ E1M2
osams-Fallen Angels 183-138 @ DM2
53
Playoffs Division 1the Viper Squad vs Enigma
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-03 Comments: 18 Today: 0
the Viper Squad-Enigma 217-165 @ DM3
the Viper Squad-Enigma 168-206 @ DM2
the Viper Squad-Enigma 235-168 @ E1M2
the Viper Squad-Enigma 226-202 @ DM2
18
Playoffs Division 2Apocalypse 2000 vs PISSED COBS
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-02 Comments: 9 Today: 0
Apocalypse 2000-PISSED COBS 207-198 @ E1M2
Apocalypse 2000-PISSED COBS 199-213 @ DM2
Apocalypse 2000-PISSED COBS 205-137 @ DM3
Apocalypse 2000-PISSED COBS 166-226 @ DM2
Apocalypse 2000-PISSED COBS 252-212 @ E1M2
9
Playoffs Division 1Slackers vs Fusion
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-02 Comments: 40 Today: 0
Slackers-Fusion 273-144 @ DM3
Slackers-Fusion 196-182 @ DM2
Slackers-Fusion 275-187 @ DM2
40
Playoffs Division 2Demolition Crew vs Fraggers United
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-05-02 Comments: 5 Today: 0
Demolition Crew-Fraggers United 155-165 @ DM3
Demolition Crew-Fraggers United 207-150 @ DM2
Demolition Crew-Fraggers United 201-168 @ E1M2
Demolition Crew-Fraggers United 225-158 @ E1M2
5
.: Upcoming games
No matches have been played so far.
.: Content

Playoffs #2

2010-04-20 01:26 by 1tsinen

Well I've decided to insert the enemies here aswell as some minor remainders...

... to you players out there. We still want some people to write playoffs previews!

Div1:
tVS - 3tk
]SR[ - Sauna
Fusion - SD
Enigma - CCCP

Div2:
A2k - DC2
Fu - SSC
DC - M44
Csn - PC

Div3:
BP - mofos
Osams - cpm.qw
[da] - =FA=
Inblz - Paras

Info & notices:
TB3 will be played first, first choice of map is the team with more points in the regular season (clanname first on the list above). 2nd map will be decided by the other team, while 3rd map will be the remaining one of the three maps. 4th map will be decided by the team who has less mapwins and last map will be chosen by guess who?

Quarters:
A:1vs8
B:2vs7
C:3vs6
D:4vs5

Semis:
AvsD
BvsC

All games are Bo5. Now gl & hf!

Views: 2829


Comments

Pages: 1, 2 | Previous Next | Total of 79 comments | First Last comment first


#1 MajQ - 2010-04-20 06:42 (95.160.140.XXX)
well strange thing:) why machinery does not play in play-off (div3)?
#2 Birdy - 2010-04-20 08:28 (83.15.82.XXX)
exactly. Where machinery?
#3 Hagge - 2010-04-20 08:43 (85.24.185.XXX)
Adding the playoffs games without having corrected the group stage tables just makes it a bit confusing for a lot of clans and players :S

I'm working on an end of group play / playoffs text btw :E
#4 blAze - 2010-04-20 08:44 (83.102.10.XXX)
Is there somekind of problem with confirming games that include a wo?
#5 Rikoll - 2010-04-20 08:48 (212.33.142.XXX)
From my view it seems that in Div1 its 1st vs 8th, 2nd vs 6th, 3rd vs 5th and 4th vs 7th. Seems really weird tbh. Also I can't see how Sauna, 3tk or CCCP can get past SD if that is not the case. I mean, it should be like 1vs8, 2vs7, 3vs6, 4vs5 ye?
#6 nitram - 2010-04-20 08:52 (85.119.130.XXX)
Walkovers have been included, they just haven't updated the table. I'm guessing CCCP took WO from revolution (which is strange?) and surpassed suddendeath and Sauna, whom probably didn't take/or get any WO's. Thus resulting in CCCP moving up to 5th, suddendeath down to 6th and Sauna on 7th.

What I mean by strange is that Revolution played real hard the first months of the season but seems to have gone inactive the last 2 weeks. This makes the rules for wo pretty strange, considering teams like CCCP and suddendeath just started to get real active the last week (and the additional 1 week) of the season.
#7 blAze - 2010-04-20 08:57 (83.102.10.XXX)
Looking at the groupgames, looks like f - sd is going to be a hot game. :)
#8 Rikoll - 2010-04-20 09:00 (212.33.142.XXX)
Sure, must be the way it goes then. CCCP in front of SD season seems really weird when comparing those two teams result. Not gonna whine about unfairness, but it sure looks like SD is at least the 4th best team this season so kinda suck facing them in the quarters when you've placed 3rd yourself due to abit weird WOs.
#9 murdoc - 2010-04-20 09:43 (89.146.31.XXX)
I am guessing no1 doesnt play no2 in semi

no1 vs no4
no2 vs no3 ?
#10 razor - 2010-04-20 09:48 (81.201.222.XXX)
I can understand you dont wanna face SD :) to be fair thou CCCP has been kind of semi-active the entire season (we played them early at least) so it might be fully possible they deserved that WO, i dont know any details though. About SD: they only got active the very last weeks and played 8 games so even if they ARE 4th best doesnt mean they deserve the spot since the point system rewards activity alot.
I think we (enigma) prefers getting CCCP thou :) even thou we lost to CCCP and won SD in the regular season.
#11 nitram - 2010-04-20 10:08 (85.119.130.XXX)
On paper we're seeded in the toughest bracket I guess, but I think it's perfect for us coming into every game as underdogs. SD aren't very active as a team anyway so if we just field active players I wouldn't worry too much. Slackers will most likely be a tough opponent for either us or SD, but they are beatable for sure. I guess you could pick from getting an easier opponent in CCCP and Enigma but then facing an (almost) impossible task in beating TVS in a semifinal. So I think we should still be pleased with our seeding, considering CCCP and Enigma seems pretty motivated and tries to get pracs going, both teams have great potential so I would be more worried if we were to face either of those teams in a quarterfinal.
#12 Birdy - 2010-04-20 10:22 (83.15.82.XXX)
and what is the machinery? How is this possible with the FA could jump into our place without change of the table teams below us?
#13 Ihminen - 2010-04-20 10:22 (195.148.49.XXX)
SD - f is going to be a thriller. SD in their best shape and with a bit of luck can beat anyteam this season. With some activity they might even face slackers in the final.
#14 xpr - 2010-04-20 10:28 (95.27.197.XXX)
Fix your eyes nitram, we had 1(!) unplayed game vs Rev on last week, which i tried to schedule in last 4 weeks, constantly asked on their almost empty
channel. I can't say that we were superactive during this season, but way more active than SD, which played 80% of their games on last 2 weeks.
Actually i don't care about playoff's opponent, because SR/F/Enigma/SD looks more or less equal for me, but these nitram's attemps to get CCCP as playoff's opponent looks so transparent and funny :) Be a men please and accept possible loss vs SD in 1st round :D
And Rikoll, we won vs Enigma, so we should be higher in table from your point of view, but reality is a bit different.
#15 nitram - 2010-04-20 10:35 (85.119.130.XXX)
Maybe you should read my post xpr? Where I explained that I rather play SD instead of CCCP and Enigma. Why would I try to mess up your oh so deserved 5th spot? I said the walkover system was flawed, much like it's always been, but on the other hand I had no idea you tried to schedule the game with them, all I know is they've been active at one point, and CCCP active in the latter stage of the season. Besides, my post regarding the walkover was a reply to Rikolls post, clearly I'm not the ONLY one who should fix my eyes here, xpr.
#16 Ihminen - 2010-04-20 10:39 (195.148.49.XXX)
It seems there was not much point in my post. But me writing posts is closest to tvs getting pracs nowadays and that was just a warmup x[
#17 Zepp - 2010-04-20 10:44 (212.33.22.XXX)
as i remember, we managed to shedule a game with Rev at least 2 time (and first time was definetely in the first half of season), but didn't play because of some avenger's software/hardware problems, and absense of their 4th player another time.
#18 Zepp - 2010-04-20 10:45 (212.33.22.XXX)
and, boys, please be sweet :)
peace, bros
#19 Darff - 2010-04-20 10:50 (193.130.68.XXX)
Would be good to get some kind of explanation about things like which seed plays which, and why machinery aren't in the div3 playoffs... don't lose faith now 1tsinen!

QFs should definitely be 1v8, 2v7, 3v6, 4v5, and SFs should then definitely be 1v4, 2v3. Is this the case?
#20 nitram - 2010-04-20 10:58 (85.119.130.XXX)
I'm not an admin, but seems pretty logical to me looking at which clan plays which that the seeds are indeed 1v8, 2v7, 3v6, 4v5. and semifinals are 1v4 and 2v3. The misunderstanding comes from the old group stage division table that hasn't been updated with the walkovers. So in the case where Machinery have gone missing from playoffs I guess some teams got walkovers and they didn't, which meant they missed their chance. This is why I think the walkovers are flawed, some teams don't even bother to collect their walkovers where as other teams see this as a chance to get a better position and claim WO's, and I think this is what happened in div3. That's not saying activity SHOULDNT be rewarded. But it's just strange when I think a better? team goes missing because other teams were smart enough to submit their walkovers.
#21 Rikoll - 2010-04-20 10:59 (212.33.142.XXX)
Darff: yeah that appears to be the case, its just the WO's havent been added in the tables yet.

And to xpr: yeah I'm not gonna complain about the fairness of it. You deserve the spot, but I still regard SD as a stronger team and therefore would prefer not facing them in the first play off match. Too bad they weren't more active throughout the season. Thats my only point :-).

GL HF! Looks like hot games ahead.
#22 Hooraytio - 2010-04-20 11:06 (85.228.248.XXX)
Correct tables are coming.

I also updated with who meets who and corrected a mistake that put mofos in playoffs instead of machinery.

Yes, the confusion with placings depends on a number of WO's. We will present those asap.
#23 Jimo - 2010-04-20 11:14 (213.50.73.XXX)
Machinery when you seems to be active here and not at irc atm, can you play tonight ~19-21 cet?
#24 Ihminen - 2010-04-20 11:30 (195.148.49.XXX)
I think activity is what counts in these tournaments... Otherwise tvs and sd shouldnt play at all since we _belong_ to the final.
Im not sure if this is place for speculation but i watched that sr - sd demo and even sr managed to win bps and the rest of SD showed really strong gameplay there. Even IF diki started to play serious again and wanted to play instead of Milton we are going to have really tough time to win SD (or SR)
#25 Hooraytio - 2010-04-20 11:44 (85.228.248.XXX)
Disregard that news about machinery.
There was an older error that gave machinery an extra point vs ABLZ which hadnt been corrected. Div3 playoff fixtures are correct as shown in the news now.
#26 razor - 2010-04-20 12:08 (81.201.222.XXX)
it's logical and I think we all know that it's 1vs8 2vs7 etc.. but the question comes at semifinals. It's not enough to say "2vs3" and "1vs4" . The question is if it's fixed brackets or if the highest seed always play the lowest seed.
#27 razor - 2010-04-20 12:13 (81.201.222.XXX)
I think in previous seasons it has been highest seed always plays the lowest? So that the 1st team always get the best path.
#28 mads - 2010-04-20 12:18 (95.26.243.XXX)
still i didn't get it..why fa places higher than cpm.qw. where are cpm.qw's wo points?
#29 nitram - 2010-04-20 12:22 (85.119.130.XXX)
#27 razor, Nah I wouldn't say it's always been like that. If i'm right regarding your statement that would mean for example, if we were to predict slackers ended 8th and 3tk ended 3rd, would that by your saying mean that tVS would play 3tk? Seeing as they are clearly lower seeded than SR? I think it's always been based on the positions in the table, ie. a fixed bracket. #1 always plays #8th. etc. And #4 and #5 is in that very same bracket. Meaning the semifinal is between the winner of #1 and #8 vs winner between #4 and #5.
#30 Hooraytio - 2010-04-20 12:23 (85.228.248.XXX)
Brackets are fixed and will be played as shown in the news post.
#31 Birdy - 2010-04-20 12:29 (83.15.82.XXX)
heh ... . It follows that we were out of 1 defeat. Question: Where is wo ?
#32 Hooraytio - 2010-04-20 12:32 (85.228.248.XXX)
Birdy: did you report to admins you had problems getting a game played? did u book a game and then nmys didnt show? The ones who got WOs have all tried to play a certain team but failed because of the other team couldnt.
#33 Hagge - 2010-04-20 12:34 (130.235.235.XXX)
Finally we can see the table!
About Revolution they have been dead for the last 3-4 weeks, so not so much to bitch about why clans got wos against them. We tried ourselves to schedule, but NOT even ONE player showed up. Yarpen in Revolution confirmed that the clan is pretty much dead, sadly :(

Seems like there will be really great games coming up, can't wait! :E GL!
#34 B1aze - 2010-04-20 12:40 (91.103.66.XXX)
Could you make it more clear how the last map will be chosen?
#35 Rikoll - 2010-04-20 12:48 (212.33.142.XXX)
@B1aze: If 2-1 after three maps, the team with only 1 map victory picks the next. In case of 2-2, the team with 2 map victories after tb3 picks. Thought that was quite obvious? :-)
#36 nitram - 2010-04-20 12:49 (85.119.130.XXX)
#34 B1aze,

You pick one map each first, the team with the most points from regular season gets to pick first. Then you play the remaining map from the map pool (wether the score is 1-1 or 2-0 doesn't matter).

If the scores are 2-1 to Team 1 then Team 2 picks the 4th map. If the score is level 2-2 after the 4th map then Team 1 picks the deciding map.
#37 Birdy - 2010-04-20 12:50 (83.15.82.XXX)
I do not. I'm not cl. The Public Enemies have tried to arrange a match already 7 weeks ago. Even yesterday we waited for them by 21 (so it was determined). They were from us: Snow, Haflinger, Faustov, Bibo, Chironex, Nefurii and me. Never us it was not so many players at once.
quad at home? - Everyone knows that do not play for a long time.
And what is there to report?
#38 Hooraytio - 2010-04-20 13:11 (85.228.248.XXX)
Report what problems you had with clans. And report wo vs them you tried to play but they didnt show up, simple as that.
#39 razor - 2010-04-20 13:14 (81.201.222.XXX)
nitram: I think you misunderstood me. I said that it is 1vs8 2vs7 etc.. and no doubt that it's the logical way to do it (in first round).
My question i brought up was if it's in the 2nd round (semis) is either a fixed bracket or if highest position in the board always plays lowest in the board. (so that the winning team always gets the best playoff-path.)
A scenario: Lets say nr 7 wins vs nr 2. With a fixed bracket it would be 1vs4 and 3vs7. With the other system it is 1vs7 and 3vs4. Im pretty sure both has been used before and it says nothing about it in rules so I my question was which is used.
#40 razor - 2010-04-20 13:18 (81.201.222.XXX)
i just saw this:
Semis:
AvsD
BvsC

so nevermind me :)
im pretty certain the other system has been used before too thou cause i remember it was whining about it.
#41 razor - 2010-04-20 13:21 (81.201.222.XXX)
btw im pretty sure B1aze was ironic.
#42 Hagge - 2010-04-20 13:23 (85.24.185.XXX)
Birdy: And how is the admins supposed to know that? It's not like they monitor your every step and know which games you have tried to play, and which not. That's where the report function comes in. It's the communcation link between you and the admins together with irc!
#43 Hagge - 2010-04-20 13:24 (85.24.185.XXX)
I wouldn't be so sure about that razor :E
#44 biborodek - 2010-04-20 13:25 (94.75.121.XXX)
WTF????

1. Make clear rules about WO.
„To make it as fair as possible in these kind of situations, admins will look into which solution is best in every case.” – thats all about WO in rules.
Not a word about reporting. It seems all teams of div 3 (exept FA and PE) didn’t know what to do in that case. I guess you need to report that you tried to play that game. But is this enought? I’ve just chcecked and PE got 3 WO. They were inactive ALL season and wanted to play all team in Saturday and Sunday. And now they have 3 WO - brilliant !!! In our case – they wanted to play against us in Saturday – i had 4 but not our best lineup so i refused. Then we scheduled our match on Sunday 21 Cest.

Sunday 18.04.10 - about 23 CEST

YOP U GOT 4
U SAID UD PLAY OTDAY
i will have :) in 2 h
in 2hr?
so
2:00pm CST?
dont know :E 21 cest
* GND has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
* GND has quit (Ping timeout)
games?
GAMES?
now?
ye
s
sniegowy is on
halfing
u
but they have just gone :)
WTF
zz
we were at 21 cet
and 22 cet
like we scheduled yesterday
COMEON BRO PLEASE
i cant get them back
jesus
why thwyer was anybody form your team 2 h earlier?
i tried to you and veg
i dunno man
its 4:30pm
i cant sit on my ass all day
on sunday afternoon
when my gf
would kjill me
can u give us a w.o.?
no way :D
look we have been scheduled for 21 cet today right?
:<
it wont hurt u at all ur in playoffs for sure
i think it can :(
why couldnt you told us earlier - like 3 -5 days before taht you want to play
we thought we have played all games - but not with PE and QAH
becouse you wewe inactive for all season
dude
if we play now
with ur scrub lineup
YOU WILL GET A POINT
i need points
u guys have ur points
but why you werent at 21 like we scheduled?
we were on server and irc all the time till 23 .30 :D
cause my fucken gf
flipped out on me
and shut the computer off
BIB
please brother
PLEASE
well im afraid is your falult that you havent been playing all season. I cant risk all te effort we puted in eql sorry
u have enuff t oscrim then?
i dont know - some games havent been reported yet
so evertything may change

So tell me tell me tell me - who’s falult was that and who get WO form this game? They had people on Saturday we on Sunday. Look again and remember they have been inactive ALL season – and yet admins gave them 3 WO agains Dybbuk PT and cpm.qw. Can i ask – WTF is wrong with you people???

2. About QAH my chat with Anni

06.04.10
hi
hi
when can we play :)?
dunno qah seams pretty dead
 qah-annni has quit (Read error: EOF from client)

Everyone form div 3 knows QAH is inactive ATM. They have played only 3 games in the beginnig of the season.
I dont know if what i showed is enought and it isn’t too late. We were active all the season and i think we earned to play in Playoffs. I also think clans like cmp.qw and PT who were acvite throughout season should have got WO with PE and now its quite different.

I dont know wheter admins change they opinon and let us play in Playoffs – but i know we need one admin who knows whats happenig in div 3 and clear rules about WO. Can you just jump last day and if nobody wants to play game with you then you will get WO?

Have a nice day
#45 biborodek - 2010-04-20 13:38 (94.75.121.XXX)
Sorry names were in tags - so if someone is interested and can't read it - find me on IRC about 6 pm
#46 serox - 2010-04-20 14:15 (85.118.17.XXX)
Looks good. Hope I can get to play vs SD this time!
#47 Zalon - 2010-04-20 14:19 (83.89.93.XXX)
PE got 2 wo's, and cpm.qw got wo over PE
#48 razor - 2010-04-20 14:39 (81.201.222.XXX)
btw I must say all quarters in div1 looks pretty even and interesting. Except 3tk-tvs.. no offense ;) Sauna could maybe upset SR on dm2 at least :) and enigma-cccp and sd-fusion is extremly even games :) Good Luck to all!
#49 nitram - 2010-04-20 14:41 (85.119.130.XXX)
Agreed, admins deserve credit for making this one of the best seasons in a long time with lots of interesting and even games. Let alone the activity and teams that has surprised.
#50 serox - 2010-04-20 14:48 (85.118.17.XXX)
I think we are going to take every dm3:D

SD going down this time:p

/drama

Showing Page 1 of 2
A total of 79 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1, 2

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Verification imageCode from image aboveNameComment
.: Poll
There are no polls.
Poll list
.: Menu
Content
  • News
  • Forum
  • Players
  • Teams
  • Played Games
  • Statistics - Frags
  • Statistics - Maps
  • News archive
  • Admins
  • Signup
  • Rules
Divisions
  • Division 1
  • Division 2
  • Division 3
  • Playoffs Division 1
  • Playoffs Division 2
  • Playoffs Division 3
.: Columns
  • (21 Apr) Hooraytio
  • (06 Mar) Kapitan Kloze
  • (02 Mar) Slabiutki
.: Seasons
  • European Quake League 1
  • European Quake League 2
  • European Quake League 3
  • European Quake League 4
  • European Quake League 5
  • European Quake League 6
  • European Quake League 7
  • European Quake League 8
  • European Quake League 9
  • European Quake League 10
  • European Quake League 11
  • European Quake League 12
  • European Quake League 13
  • European Quake League 14
.: External
    Get Started
  • nQuake
    News & Stuff
  • Quakeworld.nu
  • Quakeworld.ru
  • Quaddicted
  • Besmella-Quake
  • Challenge-TV
  • Quake Servers
  • Goldrush (betting)
    Tournaments
  • Ownage Duel Tournament
  • QuakeWorld Duel League
Additional work done by PreMorteM and Zalon.
If you want to use any material on this site you'll have to contact Åke Vader.
All material on this site is copyrighted and protected by law.