.: Played Games
Playoffs Division 2Magnum 44 vs In a Blaze
0 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-16 Comments: 16 Today: 0
Magnum 44-In a Blaze 132-204 @ DM3
Magnum 44-In a Blaze 78-243 @ DM2
Magnum 44-In a Blaze 0-1 @ E1M2
16
Playoffs Division 2Bad Luck Troopers vs ChoseN
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-13 Comments: 38 Today: 0
Bad Luck Troopers-ChoseN 174-114 @ DM2
Bad Luck Troopers-ChoseN 195-155 @ CMT4
Bad Luck Troopers-ChoseN 190-187 @ E1M2
38
Playoffs Division 2Bad Luck Troopers vs In a Blaze
1 - 0

Game info

Reported: 1970-01-01 Comments: 24 Today: 0
24
Playoffs Division 3Psy vs machinery
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-13 Comments: 28 Today: 0
Psy-machinery 187-85 @ CMT1B
Psy-machinery 171-142 @ DM2
Psy-machinery 247-127 @ DM3
28
Playoffs Division 1Fusion vs Suddendeath
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-12 Comments: 10 Today: 0
Fusion-Suddendeath 301-113 @ DM3
Fusion-Suddendeath 210-214 @ DM2
Fusion-Suddendeath 233-163 @ CMT4
Fusion-Suddendeath 243-234 @ E1M2
10
Playoffs Division 1Slackers vs the Viper Squad
1 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-11 Comments: 104 Today: 0
Slackers-the Viper Squad 99-266 @ DM3
Slackers-the Viper Squad 114-278 @ CMT1B
Slackers-the Viper Squad 223-184 @ DM2
Slackers-the Viper Squad 159-301 @ CMT4
104
Playoffs Division 3machinery vs ChallengeQuake ProWorld
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-07 Comments: 1 Today: 0
machinery-ChallengeQuake ProWorld 195-91 @ DM2
machinery-ChallengeQuake ProWorld 181-123 @ CMT4
machinery-ChallengeQuake ProWorld 193-67 @ CMT1B
1
Playoffs Division 2ChoseN vs Magnum 44
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-06 Comments: 22 Today: 0
ChoseN-Magnum 44 271-128 @ E1M2
ChoseN-Magnum 44 165-195 @ DM2
ChoseN-Magnum 44 185-136 @ CMT1B
ChoseN-Magnum 44 218-138 @ DM3
22
Playoffs Division 1Slackers vs Suddendeath
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-06 Comments: 42 Today: 0
Slackers-Suddendeath 181-189 @ DM3
Slackers-Suddendeath 229-172 @ DM2
Slackers-Suddendeath 222-138 @ CMT1B
Slackers-Suddendeath 202-257 @ E1M2
Slackers-Suddendeath 311-82 @ CMT4
42
Playoffs Division 3Psy vs Fallen Angels
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-05 Comments: 33 Today: 0
Psy-Fallen Angels 150-164 @ DM3
Psy-Fallen Angels 206-164 @ E1M2
Psy-Fallen Angels 186-126 @ CMT1B
Psy-Fallen Angels 217-225 @ DM2
Psy-Fallen Angels 219-122 @ CMT4
33
.: Upcoming games
No matches have been played so far.
.: Magnum 44 vs Bad Luck Troopers
Division 2Reported: 2010-10-11 22:41Week: 4
.: Played Maps
DM2 - Claustrophobopolis
Magnum 44: 204Bad Luck Troopers: 150
52.jpg
Submitted data
brv61
samon55
joe55
thunder33
knave63
hafog51
kapo21
alavesa (batista)15
Map Statistics:
Teams 44 blt
Frags204150
Summary

Map: dm2

Date: 2010-10-11 21:14:49 CEST

Quads1010
Red Armors5146
Yellow Armors5056
Taken RLs5142
Killed RLs3441
Dropped RLs3323
Given Damage3877733589

Efficiency awards goes to [blt]knave for 63.6 effi

RL Killer awards goes to [blt]knave for 21 killed RLs

Frag Streak awards goes to [ 44 ]joe and [blt]hafog for 25 frags in one streak

Quadrunner awards goes to [ 44 ]brv and [ 44 ]joe for 6 frags in one Quadrun

Boomsticker awards goes to [ 44 ]samon for 42.2 shotgun percentage

Aimer awards goes to [ 44 ]brv for 32 direct rocket hits

Annihilator awards goes to [ 44 ]brv for 13841 given damage


View detailed map statistics



DM3 - The Abandoned Base
Magnum 44: 161Bad Luck Troopers: 164
53.jpg
Submitted data
brv51
thunder42
samon34
joe34
kapo51
knave44
hafog43
alavesa (batista)26
Map Statistics:
Teams 44 blt
Frags161164
Summary

Map: dm3

Date: 2010-10-11 21:37:53 CEST

Quads137
Red Armors1822
Yellow Armors2124
Pentagrams13
Taken RLs2522
Killed RLs1922
Dropped RLs67
Given Damage2668226864

Efficiency awards goes to [blt]kapo for 59.3 effi

RL Killer awards goes to [blt]kapo and [blt]hafog for 8 killed RLs

Frag Streak awards goes to [blt]kapo for 28 frags in one streak

Quadrunner awards goes to [ 44 ]brv and [blt]hafog for 6 frags in one Quadrun

Boomsticker awards goes to [blt]kapo for 41.7 shotgun percentage

Aimer awards goes to [blt]hafog for 16 direct rocket hits

Annihilator awards goes to [blt]knave for 7797 given damage


View detailed map statistics



E1M2 - Castle of the Damned
Magnum 44: 93Bad Luck Troopers: 223
54.jpg
Submitted data
joe34
samon22
myca19
brv18
knave68
torch65
hafog52
kapo38
Map Statistics:
Teams 44 blt
Frags93223
Summary

Map: e1m2

Date: 2010-10-11 22:07:38 CEST

Quads713
Yellow Armors1537
Taken RLs3234
Killed RLs2726
Dropped RLs2417
Given Damage2090132182

Efficiency awards goes to [blt]torch for 74.7 effi

RL Killer awards goes to [blt]knave for 11 killed RLs

Frag Streak awards goes to [blt]torch for 32 frags in one streak

Quadrunner awards goes to [blt]hafog for 6 frags in one Quadrun

Boomsticker awards goes to [blt]torch for 43.8 shotgun percentage

Aimer awards goes to [blt]knave for 25 direct rocket hits

Annihilator awards goes to [blt]knave for 9214 given damage


View detailed map statistics



.: Comments
Pages: 1 | Previous Next | Total of 40 comments | First Last comment first

#1 biboslaw wielki - 2010-10-12 09:27 (178.73.48.XXX)
:U I thought we can expect 44 in finals but i'm not sure now. All clans know what to pick vs 44 :). Pracc with tks - they're good on e1m2. Pracc and pracc - don't count on luck becouse luck has nothing to do with qw < rikoll ;-)
#2 Mingle - 2010-10-12 11:51 (88.115.46.XXX)
Can those connection problems explain that poor e1m2 performance?
#3 Hagge - 2010-10-12 12:53 (212.221.52.XXX)
Seems like a well played game boys o/
#4 Goqsane - 2010-10-12 14:42 (83.13.111.XXX)
true, 44 sucks, probably + would defend them on e1m2 and dm2...
#5 goqsane - 2010-10-12 15:02 (193.190.253.XXX)
Can any admin see who sent that comment in my name? (the real goqsane)
#6 MajQ - 2010-10-12 16:04 (95.160.137.XXX)
probably some cock did send it :)
#7 Goqsane (the real one) - 2010-10-12 16:17 (94.42.34.XXX)
Can any admin see who sent that comment in my name? (the real goqsane). The second one is poorly impersonating me.
#8 Hagge - 2010-10-12 17:04 (212.221.52.XXX)
Stop acting like a child goqsane :(
#9 Hagge - 2010-10-12 19:16 (93.242.72.XXX)
derp
#10 no - I'm Goqsane (the real one) - 2010-10-12 22:15 (77.253.48.XXX)
yeah stop acting like that :)
#11 joe - 2010-10-13 11:11 (194.181.109.XXX)
hmm... HOW COME HAFOG PLAYS IN BLT BUT HE IS IN CMT TEAM??? CHEAT?
#12 Hooraytio - 2010-10-13 12:42 (83.233.83.XXX)
Because cmt wont play.
#13 kapo - 2010-10-13 13:08 (217.152.218.XXX)
cmt died due to inactivity so myself and hafog joined in blt instead
#14 Kapitan Kloze - 2010-10-13 13:10 (89.174.118.XXX)
Shouldn't such stuff be cleared BEFORE any game is played??? I mean, erasing CMT and classifying players like Hafog to a correct team?
Admins, behave yourselves
#15 rkd - 2010-10-13 13:12 (85.8.60.XXX)
TELL EM SOULJA BOY! I mean Kapitan Kloze! ;)
#16 radzioH - 2010-10-13 13:20 (82.177.11.XXX)
just a reminder:
"don't count on luck becouse luck has nothing to do with qw"

:D
#17 kapo - 2010-10-13 14:18 (217.152.218.XXX)
It took like 5 days (after batista informed them that I'm joining in with hafog) from the admins to add us in blt's lineup.. only wondering how long it will take to delete cmt from the list. I dont have the time or the patience to wait that long I want to play ffs :D
#18 hafog - 2010-10-13 15:12 (130.231.156.XXX)
DRAMA LOL. You can leave cmt in case the others get some action going on :/
#19 Hagge - 2010-10-13 15:34 (212.221.52.XXX)
Blame admins or Canada, or why not Goqsane?
#20 joe - 2010-10-13 19:56 (87.207.73.XXX)
lol still its stupid, lets add to our lineup some div0 plrs and then we will clame admins known bout it some time ago but they didnt do anything ... well shame, im a bit fed up with the organization, first we are forced to delete our plrs from lineup because they r "too good" then such thing ! now lets consider the "strenght and potential of the blt" - DO THEY BELONG IN DIV2 - so sad
#21 rkd - 2010-10-13 21:05 (85.8.60.XXX)
"lol still its stupid, lets add to our lineup some div0 plrs and then we will clame admins known bout it some time ago but they didnt do anything"

Admins have to confirm/accept additions to clan roster before they become available on the site. So they have been accepted by admins to play with blt, I don't know what happened with them still being in the lineup of cmt tho. Clan leaders of each clan can remove players from their roster so perhaps admin thought they would do that themselves.
#22 kapo - 2010-10-13 21:16 (82.103.226.XXX)
hahah, div0 players... now i've heard it all :D
#23 Hagge - 2010-10-14 08:41 (188.223.195.XXX)
Yeah, I'm not sure what you are whining about joe? Kapo is clearly not div0 (yet!) Be

Funny thing is that it was actually an admin who told me to join blt ;) So what player were you not allowed to add joe? *curious*
#24 samon - 2010-10-14 12:34 (193.105.192.XXX)
Admins have deleted brv and pita from our lineup, then after my intervention they agreed for brv only. And about week ago I've added Emil (Iron), and what I know admins don't want to confirm him because like they say he's to good. I'm so tired and sick of this!
#25 hafog - 2010-10-14 12:52 (213.216.254.XXX)
dunno maan. I wonder what would have happened if you won that dm3? No whine? No drama? It's ridiculous to say that the additions to blt were misjudged. Me&kapo are clearly div2 players but very solid at our best(for div2). It helps to field 4 capable players. The issue here is 3 divisions and thats the way it is.

Anyways, no idea about your roster additions but the whine/drama here is lol, maybe you should take it to the admins not flame eql comments.
#26 hafog - 2010-10-14 12:55 (213.216.254.XXX)
Lastly, it's just a glitch somewhere that we are in cmt roster too. The point is trivial because we will _not_ play for cmt, it's that simple.
#27 torch - 2010-10-14 13:00 (88.85.128.XXX)
You have 3 players already from Revolution (last season div1 team), so I don't understand your whining about our players. Just gives an impression that you guys are piss poor losers :/

gg's nevertheless.
#28 Hagge - 2010-10-14 13:05 (212.221.52.XXX)
I can see your concern samon, and I do think you should be entitled to add those players. Imo teams like csn, blt, in a blaze and ssc would probably still be stronger, or at least equal to your level.

However, this is not the right place to bitch about it. I doubt the admins check here, so go and pm them on irc instead. Once they have made a decision they usually don't change it though, unfortunately!
#29 fst - 2010-10-14 13:12 (77.79.218.XXX)
If I risk the statement that: hafog, kapo, iron, brv and pita are of similar skill, then we get:

some players with similar skill were let to join one team but firbidden to join another in the same division.

I'm not a fan of m44 but it doesn't seem fair.
#30 Kapitan Kloze - 2010-10-14 13:19 (94.42.41.XXX)
I concur with the above statement. It's not fair.

Moreover: Samon is arguing here because, as he told me, there's no response from the admins to his pleas. So maybe he wishes to expose the predicament here and now.
#31 rkd - 2010-10-14 14:51 (85.8.61.XXX)
Well looking at the additions to blt I don't see why vega shouldn't be allowed to m44 imo. BLT even fielded one of their weaker players alavesa in 2 of the maps, the one they lost and the one they barely won.
Add to that the fact they gonna be able to field hagge occassionally (even tho he is on laptop) they are going to become even better. So yea if they allowed this then I don't really see why they wouldn't allow vega.

Anyway the main issue imho why you had to drop players before was because admins had no idea that joe was blasphemer and that pita was lanix. Might've looked for admins that you were trying to fakenick to get into a lower div. Then there's the div1 syndrome. Once you play in div1 you can never go back, even tho you didn't belong there. In admin eyes you still had an entire "div1" lineup.
#32 Hagge - 2010-10-14 15:04 (212.221.52.XXX)
Hehe have to agree with:
"Then there's the div1 syndrome. Once you play in div1 you can never go back, even tho you didn't belong there. In admin eyes you still had an entire "div1" lineup."

Revolution got smacked quite badly in div1 though, and the players from Revolution in m44 were not the one doing all the damage (avenger and maks).

However, it is a bit sneaky with all these nick changes. I know joe is blasp since he has been known as joe for a while, but had no clue that pita is lanix :)
#33 samon - 2010-10-14 18:17 (212.180.147.XXX)
Like Kapitan Kloze said, I tried to contact admins but they ignore me or give unclear answers that's why I've decided to write here about this problem. And yes, it so unfair that we cant add any good player. I have feeling that admins treat us badly for some purpose (not you Hooraytio, the only admin who tried to help me) and I dont know why? Just confirm Emil please and it will stop this "whine".
#34 samon - 2010-10-14 20:24 (212.180.147.XXX)
Guys, do you think that with Emil (Vega) in the lineup we will be misplaced? Itsinen says we will... Take a look at the resutls of our pracs etc not only at nicks, you just irritate me.
#35 Kapitan Kloze - 2010-10-15 12:27 (94.42.55.XXX)
For the sake of the future EQLs:
Adding a player from a superior division should be forbidden upon completion of the registration process. It shall reduce player misplacements during a season. Obviously, players from higher divs are allowed to join forces with any team beforehand.
But.... since ex. Hagge who had played in div 1 in Oblivion was allowed to join BLT, I see no contraindication with allocating Emil vel Vega in div 2. However, such tampering with rosters should end once my rule is implemented in the next EQLs. But this case now is precedented.
#36 MajQ - 2010-10-15 14:26 (83.16.99.XXX)
Yep, I'd rather go further from the next EQL: no adding players after the divisions were set and season started. No exceptions.
Clan should play with the roster they checked in BEFORE the EQL. That will eliminate all the whine and misplacements.
#37 rkd - 2010-10-15 15:37 (85.8.60.XXX)
That's actually a terrible idea. People should be able to leave their clan if they want/need to. Some clans go inactive, those in the clan that want to or can play should ofcourse be able to join another clan if such a thing happens.
Allowing no transfers will just hurt the scene with less players.

Kloze's idea has it's flaws aswell, lets say fu would go inactive and anza (sorry for the hate don't mean to offend you :D) wants to look for a new clan, he would have a hard time finding another div1 clan to join seeing as his skill is div2.
So if no div1 clan would take him in he is forced to not play in eql at all?
I mean teams are assessed by their best lineup not their individual players in the clan, anza should be allowed to join a div2 clan if fu would drop out of div1 for some reason.
This rule is sort of in effect allready cause admins won't allow just any div1 player to go join a div2 team, with a few exceptions.

The problem in my eyes is that they are somewhat contradicting themselves with allowing a wellknown div1 player (that sure, is on laptop) to join a div2 clan but not allowing vega to join m44.
I would understand if they let neither of them in because then it would be a clearly defined line of what's allowed.
Now the line is all blurry.
#38 junkass - 2010-10-15 15:57 (80.223.143.XXX)
Oh, behave now! Was tight games, wasn't it? Only e1m2 seemed rapish.
#39 Hagge - 2010-10-15 18:34 (212.221.52.XXX)
Have to agree with rkd here, well put. It's definately hard to judge one players' skill and a lot of things have to be taken into consideration. A rusty/laptop/hpw pinged Hagge shouldn't be a problem in div2, and I think this was more or less proved in our game vs CSN :E

However, I agree that the decisions have to be made in the same way and if they were then Iron would be playing for M44 now. And updates from admins yet?
#40 rkd - 2010-10-15 18:54 (85.8.60.XXX)
yea I definetly don't mind you playing in div2, I was even hoping that you would be in the lineup vs us yesterday so I could own you one like fix ;p

sure m44 shouldn't whine so much, they got a strong team allready and that game vs blt was tight. So even now without vega they are one of the top contendors in div2.
It's just that the situation (THE SITUATION) with blt and m44 look very similar but 2 different decisions were made. I'm not saying it's the right or wrong call here, but it opens for people to second guess the admins when they don't make same decision in 2 similar matters oh yeaaah

IT'S T-SHIRT TIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIME!

Showing Page 1 of 1
A total of 40 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Verification imageCode from image aboveNameComment
.: Poll
There are no polls.
Poll list
.: Menu
Content
  • News
  • Forum
  • Players
  • Teams
  • Played Games
  • Statistics - Frags
  • Statistics - Maps
  • News archive
  • Admins
  • Rules
Divisions
  • Division 1
  • Division 2
  • Division 3
  • Playoffs Division 1
  • Playoffs Division 2
  • Playoffs Division 3
.: Columns
  • (04 Nov) Hooraytio
.: Seasons
  • European Quake League 1
  • European Quake League 2
  • European Quake League 3
  • European Quake League 4
  • European Quake League 5
  • European Quake League 6
  • European Quake League 7
  • European Quake League 8
  • European Quake League 9
  • European Quake League 10
  • European Quake League 11
  • European Quake League 12
  • European Quake League 13
  • European Quake League 14
.: External
    Get Started
  • nQuake
    News & Stuff
  • Quakeworld.nu
  • Quakeworld.ru
  • Quaddicted
  • Besmella-Quake
  • Challenge-TV
  • Quake Servers
  • Goldrush (betting)
    Tournaments
  • Ownage Duel Tournament
  • QuakeWorld Duel League
Additional work done by PreMorteM and Zalon.
If you want to use any material on this site you'll have to contact Åke Vader.
All material on this site is copyrighted and protected by law.