Playoff Division 3 (4on4) | clan hafog troopers vs Quakeklan | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 1 (2on2) | Summer Alliance vs Slackers | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 (2on2) | Quakeklan vs Bukkake Samurai | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 (4on4) | clan hafog troopers vs Team Freedom | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 2 (2on2) | dogs vs Hippushnik | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 2 (4on4) | dogs vs Hippushnik | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 5.5 (4on4) | mmm.. gibbz vs Comfortably Numb | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 1 (4on4) | sega gubbar vs Slackers | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 (2on2) | SmackThatAss vs clan hafog troopers | 3 - 1
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 4a (4on4) | Div Sub-Zero vs Na Fianna.b | 0 - 3
|
Views: 3099
Pages: 1, 2, 3 | Previous Next | Total of 115 comments | First Last comment first
#51 2008-06-25 23:56 by IBA (84.56.238.XXX)
Every1 can get anni's msges since they are available at
qwscene.net
#52 2008-06-25 23:45 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
LOL @ #61
it is DEL's own fault that he faked and now they (3b) have
to play with bagz instead or perhaps XN if he can get away
from wow for 90min or so. how hard can it be. its not like
the admins can let del play just because "3B are
div2" with this other guy
so 3b are not killed if del is banned, they are just div2?
well he can only blame himself for letting his
"div1" teammates down. very interesting anyway
since a lot of you guys have been whining about killing 3b
when they infact are not killed but just gets a little bit
worse...
lamest excuse ever there vvd
#53 2008-06-25 23:13 by 1tsinen (77.105.80.XXX)
Don't understand why Dels punishment should be any different
from Fistos? Both did the same thing and they should get the
same punishment too. And if I were VVD I would stfu on this
page now as somebody already told him to, you are digging a
REALLY BIG HOLE for yourself.
And just for information, if it's not breaking the rules to
fake in the future you can catch me playing atleast 3
different div4-6 clans :)
Now to some small copies from the rules section for the
BLIND people:
-Playing in more than one clan, or playing under someone
else's name in another clan (mercing).
If any clan or player is caught doing any of the above they
will be punished at the crew's discretion. This could be a
warning, point’s deduction or a ban from EQL. (other
offenses section, notice the last line too)
Some clips from Clan restrictions:
- ...A player can only play in 1 clan at the same time...
And all players have to be approved by the admins before
they can play any games at all.
... etc etc.. there were some more but I'm going to sleep
now so that should be enough :)
#54 2008-06-25 20:46 by bublik (77.79.138.XXX)
you should punish clan wich want to get unfair advantage not
the faker who gets nothing except risk being banned
#55 2008-06-25 20:32 by VVD (91.192.83.XXX)
Bonez has parmanent connection troubles.
Sun is innactive.
With bagz 3b ~div2, not div1. And, afaik, bagz not active
all time.
#56 2008-06-25 20:30 by fisto (213.66.216.XXX)
Hm, the rules actualy say that its not allowed to fake. And
one season ban isnt that hard to take. And its not killing a
div1 team. You can still prac and you can still play in nqr?
Getting banned from a leage that is as inactive as eql isnt
that bad. Just keep on playing and be happy.
#57 2008-06-25 20:26 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
how can they not have 4 players btw? XN gone to wow ok but:
BAGZ BULAT BUBLIK SS = 4? and then they still have BONEZ too
#58 2008-06-25 20:06 by qqshka (87.253.8.XXX)
So, this decision hurts not del but rest of 3B clan also,
since they most likelly will not have 4 ppl. One shoot, four
frags?
Perhaps, better just disqualify -1 clan and warn but not ban
del, this should prevent clans from facking more, right?
hf
#59 2008-06-25 19:49 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
maybe another cfg, who cares it was 2 seasons ago, you
should have complained back then. now you are only trying to
get the heat of your own bad behaviour...
#60 2008-06-25 19:13 by BlastastiC (86.12.233.XXX)
"Maybe you said that -1 cheating by useing fakers...
Yes. In this case this is a cheat by -1, not by
Del."
So... everyone on the team is cheating *except* the faker?
Is basically what you're saying.
#61 2008-06-25 18:25 by Irvin (217.10.38.XXX)
forgive me, has not noticed the second page :E
about Hedgepig's #53 comment:
in that case it is necessary to change rules to a following
season about faking, but in this one - make the prevention
for del.
#62 2008-06-25 18:11 by Irvin (217.10.38.XXX)
lol #50
why, in this case, different messages in AV?
#63 2008-06-25 18:10 by Hedgepig (84.203.144.XXX)
"red card for VVD (missed next season) and yellow card
for del :E" does make some sense. My logic being:
"cheating" is generally done to gain an unfair
advantage. -1, as a clan, cheated, but I think that del
just broke the rules and I would not call him a cheater,
just a rule-breaker. It is debatable of course.
I would support a ban for VVD and just a yellow card for
del, except for the fact that it sets a dangerous precedent.
Any clan that is struggling to get 4 players could just get
a div1 pal to fakenick, and the semi-active div4 clan leader
takes the hit. Tough call.
#64 2008-06-25 17:47 by VVD (91.192.83.XXX)
2Hooraytio: read, plz, my message carefully.
I said that I have demos with different team messages in
different games from 1 player. Understand?
#65 2008-06-25 16:59 by johnie (83.70.171.XXX)
VVD, with repect you would be better off not making anymore
comments as you keep digging a bigger hole for yourself and
tbh your arguement now is just laughable.
#66 2008-06-25 16:25 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
lol #47
maybe you used fakers in the groupgame and thats why u raped
them, then in the next match u didnt use fakers and AV could
win a game.
it is so fkn great to see all these wild accusations from
the russian qw community about every single clan when it is
actually russian players who cheat all the time, get over
yourselves plz...
#67 2008-06-25 15:43 by Kalma (88.112.65.XXX)
Sure, lets be lenient with cheats when they are in a div1
clan.
#68 2008-06-25 15:20 by Stev (83.70.211.XXX)
"red card for VVD (missed next season) and yellow card
for del :E"
Actually, that sounds like a pretty reasonable punishment.
It does appear to have been VVD's idea, and he's willing to
take responsibility for his actions.
It has the additional benefit of not potentially killing an
active div1 clan.
#69 2008-06-25 15:11 by VVD (91.192.83.XXX)
http
://www.eql.nu/eql5/matches.php?id=293#Played
http
://www.eql.nu/eql5/matches.php?id=235#Played
I have demos from group and 1/2 game. Ncr have different
messages. 2nd game he had messages equal with anni's
messages (not egnlish - mb de?).
And I have other examples when we win easy some team in
pracs (+150 on all maps) and lose in official game -150 in 1
or 2 weeks with same lineups and ping.
#70 2008-06-25 14:42 by opel (91.76.81.XXX)
red card for VVD (missed next season) and yellow card for
del :E
#71 2008-06-25 14:11 by SS (85.140.37.XXX)
It's very old story, but ...
http
://www.eql.nu/eql5/matches.php?id=178#Played
what do u think about PWR, who killed 17 rl(dm2) in this
game?
Why nobody was interested here?
Who was "good ol' danish players"? who could rape
us?
And as Witka sad:
"Is there any rulez about players ban without
warning?"
what says rules about it?
#72 2008-06-25 14:03 by fog (213.134.126.XXX)
Or just ban both, one for taking the plan into action, and
the other for actually performing it.
#73 2008-06-25 13:44 by VVD (194.154.66.XXX)
Cheating is aimbot, wallhack, ghosting, speedcheat etc. But
not facking. He is not a cheater. He played using self skill
only.
Maybe you said that -1 cheating by useing fackers... Yes. In
this case this is a cheat by -1, not by Del. I'm -1 team
leader and ban me instead Del.
P.S. Sorry that I want to play so strongly.
P.P.S. Oh, my english...
#74 2008-06-25 13:02 by Stev (83.70.211.XXX)
It's not as simple as that.
It's a matter of deciding which does more damage to qw:
Cheating without repercussions, or the suspension of a
player for one season.
#75 2008-06-25 12:22 by VVD (194.154.66.XXX)
Is EQL exist for observance rules or for support qw?
#76 2008-06-25 10:45 by Kalma (88.112.65.XXX)
"If any clan or player is caught doing any of the above
they will be punished at the crew's discretion. This could
be a warning, point’s deduction or a ban from
EQL."
Warnings might work for things like shitacting, but this
faking is so obviously and seriously against the rules. I
don't understand why the clan doesn't get banned in these
cases. :/ Anyway, good job EQL crew for catching another
cheat.
#77 2008-06-25 10:40 by fog (213.134.126.XXX)
What's up with people?
Read the rules, obey the rules <--- as simple as that?
If you don't, you'll get punished <--- pretty easy to
understand.
Lame excuses like: "Our team is gonna die if you do
this" <--- Well maybe should have though of that
before?
Take responsibility.
And about chosen faking: Did you get his real ip or the IP
from the Qizmo he was connecting through? :P Just send me
the IP on IRC and i will check on my servers if the player
has been there, and what nick he used.
#78 2008-06-25 09:27 by witka (194.190.161.XXX)
Is there any rulez about players ban without warning?
As I understand first of all you should make a warning for
player and in second case only ban him.
Ban only for one game is so lame.
#79 2008-06-25 03:45 by VVD (194.154.66.XXX)
Stupid www.eql.nu - replace "&"
by "&".
#80 2008-06-25 03:43 by VVD (194.154.66.XXX)
2Hedgepig: I only answer to Stev: "They beat us 2-1
last time, fair and square." And nothing else.
Как вы
за@$%*.
Мой
англи&
#1081;ский
не
позво&
#1083;яет
мне
так
красн&
#1086;речив
;о
опуск&
#1072;ть
собес&
#1077;днико
;в, как
это
делае&
#1090; Hedgepig.
Прави&
#1083;ьно
сказа&
#1083;и - кто
лучше
умеет
мошни&
#1090;ь - тот
и прав.
:-\
#81 2008-06-25 02:39 by Hedgepig (194.0.77.XXX)
VVD: your question is completely irrelevant to this
discussion. Don't you understand that? I also think that
VVD should be banned for being spineless enough to stir up
bizarre arguments in an attempt to derail the thread. Also,
I changed my mind and I think that del should be banned too
because of the sickening overuse of frowny faces by his
supporters.
#82 2008-06-25 01:45 by Irvin (217.10.38.XXX)
death of -1 was a long time ago :( and now it can be death
of good div1/2 team 3B, coz they are havent fourth player
with a delitel's skill. you can ban only del or all 3B team,
i think it will be same :( like i was told, you should ban
our team but dont touch del. :E
#83 2008-06-25 01:16 by VVD (194.154.66.XXX)
Ban, plz, me. Not Del.
P.S. This is the death of the -1...
#84 2008-06-25 00:31 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
the truth is out there
#85 2008-06-24 23:16 by meshuggah (90.188.227.XXX)
Lol, so sad.. IMO(cos i know the situation and from qw.ru)
you should ban VVD, not ass. its not ass\'s blame at all -
vvd\'s annoying irc private shit for fakering -1 can reach
anyone. the destructive element is VVD for sure. (sorry VVD,
but you at least was able to take good div4 player
c0ckatrice who was on servers that evening as more
reasonable faker(sorry for abstract lawbroke) while you
spammed div1-2 players for \"help\")
#86 2008-06-24 23:15 by VVD (194.154.66.XXX)
2Hedgepig: 50 vs 70 is "a minor ping
disadvantage"? :-D
If we play with 50 and they with 70 - who will win?
I don't want to discuss this any more if u don't understand
simple things. :-\
#87 2008-06-24 19:34 by Eta-bETa (78.69.59.XXX)
Oh, I read "who have better spelling" is the
winner... sry :E. Maybe your speach would end up top5 after
all :\. I agree with the "who gives a s. about your
excuses" opinion. Top3 then... :\
#88 2008-06-24 19:31 by Eta-bETa (78.69.59.XXX)
Omg. "PEOPLE" U would end up last in that
competition. Clearly! And I thought people had stopped
faking by now! It's a Shame..
#89 2008-06-24 19:03 by Hedgepig (84.203.144.XXX)
I'm amazed that -1 are trying to turn this around as if they
are the victims.
VVD: a minor ping disadvantage in a fair league game has
nothing to do with this. Trying to stir up a grudge match
will accomplish nothing for you or your team, it just makes
you look lame by avoiding the issue here.
Irvin: I agree that there should be a Russian admin in the
next league. At this stage, rule-breaking in leagues by
Russian clans seems to be a regular occurrence. Maybe a
Russian admin will have better insight into the community
and stop this.
SS: I agree with you... it is a shame to see a core player
in an up and coming top team be banned for a season. I
agree that it only hurts QW. It is a tough call for the
admins to make. If it were my decision I would not ban the
player.
#90 2008-06-24 18:12 by Pyta (89.160.41.XXX)
Shame at 3b for dropping mindless accusations just to get
the focus off of you.
I think the punishment for the fakers are appropriate, but
also the clan needs some kind of penalty for using a faker
when, as in this case, there is clear evidence of their
knowledge of the situation. Not just a forfeit of that
match...
Irvin: Let me burst your bubble. It\'s not Russia against
the world.
#91 2008-06-24 17:59 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
"Final vs chosen was going at our server, and chosen
used some faker in last game, their player had rejoin with
another ip. We had discussion about it, and did not do
nothing. We just pushed ready and won this game."
This is the worst bullshit i have ever read. Give me those
IPs and the name of the player you think was faking. Why
would we need to fake vs you in the 5th map when we won the
groupgame 2-1 and won the first 2 maps of the final?
Spectators accused both Mythic and Donut of being fakers in
that game. Mythic is eriko and that was clearly stated on
our lineup on the nqr site. Donut has always nicked Donut
ever since 1998 when he played in Doomed with players like
Fugitive and Shiva/Memil (Shiva might have only standinned
with them but he knows who donut is)
Stop accusing us of using fakers now since that has never
happenend
#92 2008-06-24 17:46 by SS (91.77.92.XXX)
There was a fact of change IP before 5-th game vs CHOSEN.
But we did not begin to shout about it.
Except for that there were many similar cases earlier with
other commands.
Del did not play more than two years, now he has returned
and has helped to make to us an excellent command. For last
year 3B was the most active command in 4on4. And we have
achieved good results.
But we cannot play further if will be ban :(
dont killing 3b , dont killing quakeworld :)
#93 2008-06-24 17:41 by supernova (83.252.93.XXX)
baaaaaaan
#94 2008-06-24 17:17 by fisto (213.66.216.XXX)
? Maybe im not the person who should say something here but
i have to ask SS[3b] for some prof for the shittalk about
chosen had a faker in the final?
#95 2008-06-24 17:08 by trash (90.227.152.XXX)
comment above,,can you take that in english plz? lol!
#96 2008-06-24 17:07 by Irvin (217.10.38.XXX)
i think we need atleast one russian admin for eql and nqr.
Then we will "catch" few not russian fakers
immidiatly. :E
#97 2008-06-24 15:36 by PEOPLE (70.85.173.XXX)
rulses are rules , who gives a shit about ur excuses
this site should be named like
European qompetetion lanuguage
who have better speach is the winner
i would recommend replace admin stuff with russians next
season becouse present admins are idioms that fucking
annoces on news site are jokes we have end on the season and
teams in div4 who didnt play single game , GG
yes and fuck quake policy and their ip listings
and i will tell u somthin i heard the rumors that some
people want to destroy qw and nguake mader will come to jail
also ip lists provider
#98 2008-06-24 13:50 by Stev (83.70.211.XXX)
\'2Stev: game with pings 50 vs 70 isn\'t equal to 65 vs 65.
But we played. And games was fair. If you want we can to
play prac (not replay EQL) on tb3 at WG with pings 65 vs 65.
And we will see \"fair\" game again.\'
I was trying to imply you were the better side, so I didn\'t
see why cheating was necessary.
But instead you try to imply that we weren\'t
\"fair\" in a game with ping \"50 vs
70\" (I was ping ~60, Irvin was ping 56 in that game.
Also, that server was deemed to be the fairest by an admin)
when you come along and sign up a div1 player 2 weeks ago,
presumably just because you weren\'t winning all your
matches 2-0?
I\'m afraid you don\'t get to do that.
#99 2008-06-24 13:44 by SS[3b] (91.77.92.XXX)
Ok guys, quakeworld dying, many players has left last 1-2
years, but delitel had come back and saving our team. And
now we have a new team in 1st divison. If you will ban del -
our team will dead.
We dont have another players instead of delitel.
(XN was gone to play WOW)
When our team was playing in div4, we had many cases when
have been using fakers against us, but never complained.
Final vs chosen was going at our server, and chosen used
some faker in last game, their player had rejoin with
another ip. We had discussion about it, and did not do
nothing. We just pushed ready and won this game.
Besides was many games in 4div, when some players killed
16rl for one map, and we did not do nothing, just was trying
to play better.
Yes 3b had a bad reputation with ghosting, and we are
apologizing for it.
But i ask to give our team another chance. It was fucking
mistake. Delitel is
very kind man and could not refuse from fucking request from
f#$@^ VVD.
#100 2008-06-24 13:43 by trash (90.227.152.XXX)
Irvin: after the last incident with a fake player getting
banned del knew exactly what he was getting into when faking
with you. If a player cant resist his so called friends (if
they are friends asking you to play with them risking
getting banned) its his call and he gets banned.
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.