| Playoff Division 3 (4on4) | clan hafog troopers vs Quakeklan | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 1 (2on2) | Summer Alliance vs Slackers | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 3 (2on2) | Quakeklan vs Bukkake Samurai | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 3 (4on4) | clan hafog troopers vs Team Freedom | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 2 (2on2) | dogs vs Hippushnik | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 2 (4on4) | dogs vs Hippushnik | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 5.5 (4on4) | mmm.. gibbz vs Comfortably Numb | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 1 (4on4) | sega gubbar vs Slackers | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 3 (2on2) | SmackThatAss vs clan hafog troopers | 3 - 1
| ||||||||||||
| Playoff Division 4a (4on4) | Div Sub-Zero vs Na Fianna.b | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||
Views: 3099
Pages: 1, 2, 3 | Previous Next | Total of 115 comments | First Last comment first
#101 2008-06-24 12:11 by Zaq (80.216.1.XXX)
oh no, its ilf once again!!
#102 2008-06-24 10:54 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
this thread is relevant to my interests
#103 2008-06-24 09:47 by bps (81.235.187.XXX)
ban
#104 2008-06-24 09:45 by 1tsinen (88.195.26.XXX)
Del: If that last line tries to say that it wasn't you in
the end prow sure plays good for a player that hasn't played
in hmm... veryvery long and with a identical style. The only
who nicked Prow that we got listed was from your ip, nick
ass used 313 times, prow used 12 times... and no other prow
nick on any other ip seen so far.
#105 2008-06-24 06:44 by fisto (213.66.216.XXX)
sooo lame :((
#106 2008-06-24 04:28 by lib (213.100.62.XXX)
- He's not on his own!
- Very industrious for a Cossack.
- Sneaky fucking Russian.
#107 2008-06-24 01:52 by VVD (194.154.66.XXX)
VVD is "The Universal Harm"! He is the reason of
all disasters in the world!
Camperoid, you are always right! >:-[=]
2Stev: game with pings 50 vs 70 isn't equal to 65 vs 65. But
we played. And games was fair. If you want we can to play
prac (not replay EQL) on tb3 at WG with pings 65 vs 65. And
we will see "fair" game again.
#108 2008-06-24 01:36 by del (91.196.252.XXX)
2 hooraytio: we have never played with ghosting. U can
always join our vent and look at this when we play off
games. In prac often there is many dudes sits at 1 channel
and jokes with us, but never ghosting, cause it's not
interesting to play so.
About today: My friends asked me to play with them, cause
they had no 4-th more then 2 weeks, but they wanted to play.
That wasn't cause their team wonted to be at the top or smth
like that. This is no matter when playing with fake. But
they realy wanted to play official game, cause pracs not so
interesting as off's. And at the end: real prow is playing
not worse as i played this game.
#109 2008-06-24 00:51 by bent (78.92.77.XXX)
This is so lame. Grow up Del.
#110 2008-06-24 00:48 by Irvin (217.10.38.XXX)
anyway it isnt a good decision imo. del just a good dude,
who cames to save us, coz we havent four in this time. why
you should ban him, but not our team? we just asking him and
start whining, smthn like "ah, we havent four, plz save
our asses" i think, admins should change their decision
about his person. :( bgz
#111 2008-06-23 23:53 by Stev (83.71.83.XXX)
They beat us 2-1 last time, fair and square.
Why anyone thought this was necessary is beyond me. bg.
#112 2008-06-23 23:44 by max_power (85.140.58.XXX)
that's all VVD's (console) evil genius :))
#113 2008-06-23 22:45 by loko (60.191.73.XXX)
soo lame
#114 2008-06-23 22:45 by gore (85.211.243.XXX)
Good work Itsinen, fakers never prosper!
#115 2008-06-23 22:44 by Hooraytio (81.236.232.XXX)
hmm i bet ass/del's clan 3b cheated when they beat csn in
nqr11 silver cup finals too then. csn in the lead 2-0, del
joins and csn lost 2-3. haxx? ghosting? whatever...
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.