Playoff Division 3 (4on4) | clan hafog troopers vs Quakeklan | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 1 (2on2) | Summer Alliance vs Slackers | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 (2on2) | Quakeklan vs Bukkake Samurai | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 (4on4) | clan hafog troopers vs Team Freedom | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 2 (2on2) | dogs vs Hippushnik | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 2 (4on4) | dogs vs Hippushnik | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 5.5 (4on4) | mmm.. gibbz vs Comfortably Numb | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 1 (4on4) | sega gubbar vs Slackers | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 (2on2) | SmackThatAss vs clan hafog troopers | 3 - 1
| ||||||||||||
Playoff Division 4a (4on4) | Div Sub-Zero vs Na Fianna.b | 0 - 3
|
Views: 1220
Pages: 1 | Previous Next | Total of 24 comments | First Last comment first
#1 2008-07-01 23:10 by junkass (83.245.168.XXX)
Performance of the week... no, year goes to: DOGS!
#2 2008-07-02 00:01 by Bandit (88.114.227.XXX)
Go DOGS! u have earned the title =)
#3 2008-07-02 04:39 by marv (locked doors) (82.33.87.XXX)
no sense of humour ;x no rules broken but an immediate
ban!
funny how admins dont ban clans for forming a boycott when
in my eyes its a form of bullying and has a negative impact
on qw.
but last real uk clan bites the dust so the majority will
support that. i will not take part anymore this season so
could u remove me please? might enable the final to be
played also but i strongly doubt it.
EQL
last season = 2 matches played
this season = 1 match played
QW is truly dead and hope u childish clans reap what u
sow.
anyway have fun im out
#4 2008-07-02 10:16 by 1tsinen (88.195.26.XXX)
Marvel
It's hard for anybody else to see the humour at this point,
and after struggling like hell with all the problems to find
humour in that, feels like you don't appriciate our work,
even if we spended several hours/days to try to get games
fixed for you, Lion stepped over the line and now he is
punished. That was also meant as an inslut in our eyes and
we probably have most of the scene backing up this, even
checking the writings earlier on the posts.
I don't personally have anything against some drama as long
as it doesn't include tasteless behaviour and breaking the
rules.
No rules broken = read the rules. I can count 3 warnings
included in that so it shouldn't be a surprise if the result
in a ban.
#5 2008-07-02 11:23 by batfink (212.113.204.XXX)
no fun playing vs clans who have much better pings and who
dont even want to play on fair terms anyway.
you didnt even put our points up in the leauge for the
w/o\'s we supposedly got
the people that should be banned are MM and HIPS for
plotting a boycott... marvel post the link of their
conversation here so people can see how lame they are
#6 2008-07-02 11:52 by Jimo (213.114.114.XXX)
This EQL sucked alot in the rookiediv. One 4on4 did we
played and won the hole shit. I really hope you don't start
a new league under some summer.
#7 2008-07-02 13:21 by lib (213.100.62.XXX)
Hahahaha, yeah marvel. How dare those CHILDISH clans ruin
quakeworld. If only they could follow your (dog's) example
this scene would be on top of the world.
#8 2008-07-02 13:48 by 1tsinen (88.195.26.XXX)
Jimo
Well the point was that there would be something more than
"nothing". 1 game is more than nothing afaik. We
knew there wount be much activity but the summerbreak would
have been longer than ever since NQR ended quite early in
the spring. The problem with the 5.5 was that there wasn't
anyways enough teams active on the scene, and those who had
signupped didn't even play their games. Don't blame the
organizer if the players don't play.
There will probably be new tournaments every summer, just as
there had been so far :) (not maybe eql but some other)
Imo the worst thing with this season was that most clan just
seemed to wait for their opponent to come and set a date,
will not happend if every clan thinks that way.
#9 2008-07-02 14:48 by VVD (91.192.83.XXX)
> Division 4:
> 2on2: No winner
Hm. We get WO from FA about week ago...
#10 2008-07-02 16:02 by batfnk (212.113.204.XXX)
1tsinen its impossible to make everybody happy but you are
missing the point that boycotting a team should be much more
severly punished then what has been. on looking at the
league they havent even had any points deducted (DA, HIPS,
MM etc) and to be honest EQL playoffs have never really been
the climax of the season (promotions relegations etc already
decided during the actual season)
bst were boycotted last eql by loser squadren too.. which
cost us top spot for div2 and we wasnt even given a w.o even
though ls had played all the other teams in our league..
you should at least be consistant to your rules and not just
go with the flow. thats why eql has failed so many times.
#11 2008-07-02 16:35 by fog (213.134.126.XXX)
Finally a post at a reasonable level.
As a spectator of all this, and the given facts (?), the
boycott might have been accepted from a morality point of
view.
Looking at it the other way, it\'s probably against the
rules yes.
#12 2008-07-02 17:58 by gore (85.211.243.XXX)
#5 2008-07-02 11:23 by batfink (212.113.204.XXX)
no fun playing vs clans who have much better pings and who
dont even want to play on fair terms anyway.
Well said. All I ever see is Wargamez,Wargamez,Wargamez...
boooooooring. Even a QW server on the same host as this very
site would be a lot nicer. 34ms ftw
#13 2008-07-02 21:20 by joulukuu (88.115.119.XXX)
What do you mean boycott? We played you once already. Also
I'm pretty sure that no one is boycotting against all of
dogs, just marvel, lion (atleast now) and/or batfink. As for
me, I don't mind having to play against people who are
annoying, but obviously some people are ticked off more
easily than me and I'm certainly not going to start blaming
them for that.
#14 2008-07-02 22:18 by batfink (212.113.205.XXX)
if thats the best you can come up with then you may as well
stop digging your hole now.. you only played us in a 2v2
game.. no 4v4 at all.. i dont even see what i or anyone else
has done to warrent this boycott anyway.
#15 2008-07-02 22:22 by batfink (212.113.205.XXX)
not playing some team because some of the members are
annoying... that aint the reason the reason is you didnt
want to play us and lose to people you dont like.. pretty
obvious in my opinion
#16 2008-07-02 22:33 by 1tsinen (62.241.222.XXX)
First off all, I'm not going "with the flow". 2nd
thing is that I can't make almost any changes on the pages,
so the points that are deducted and the wo:s aren't showing
since I can't edit those points and I cannot report a match
for your team (afaik).
Yes and I am feeling the same way about the boycott, but
what's the score if we punish all clans or kick them out
except yours = it's the same as it is now. Don't think I
haven't been thinking of how to get it to work. Some hid the
boycot behind the aimbotter thing and some just because of
hating Marvel I assume, haven't still got any exact answers
so hard to do really nothing when all you get is: "they
are boycotting us" or from the other side: "we
hate them they are aimbotting ffa". There's another
problem with punishing the clans also -> all guys aren't
in the boycot. Some clans did actually have enough players
to field a team to play you guys, but seemed like you
somehow pissed the last ones off and I can't do much about
that if this was the case...
And just as info, there has been no promotions etc this
season. This league was started since we did think players
wouldn't like a close to 5 month long summerbreak... just
seems we were wrong about that (counted from regular season
ending in NQR).
One more thing worth mentioning: What is similar with the
old EQL atm? Not really much except pages, divisions and
that we had kenyas also played.
JFYI this season was also a test for some new systems and
ideas. Some where great and some not too great. Atleast we
got some answers to them now.
#17 2008-07-02 22:47 by batfink (212.113.205.XXX)
we didnt piss any clans off who had 4 to play us at all
(didnt even get to the server so how could we) da played 2v2
then decided not to play 4v4, so marvel called them idiots
and that has then been the reason they didnt play us... but
they already decided not to so how can it be..
yeah ok fair enough about the other comments and for a
summer league it was more active (for the most part) then
the other eql was
#18 2008-07-03 00:19 by Mort (83.186.194.XXX)
Its irrelevant who the team is, what league it is, who the
admins are, what the game is..
There are little pricks who just thrive on pissing people
off and generally being little pricks.. they will always be
this way, no matter how many times they leave and come back
or try to 'reform' their image..
The players who defend them are worse, I mean come on, wanna
tell me a team with Embeh, Goqsane and Marvel would be
perfectly well behaved and cause absolutely no trouble at
all in the next league? Stop defending them, just get rid
of them, everyone is better off.
#19 2008-07-03 13:25 by batfink (212.113.204.XXX)
i dont think alienating poeple is the answer at all
#20 2008-07-05 00:59 by peppe (217.210.253.XXX)
I read all this and think, what has marvel ever done? The
only offensive and annoying person in qw atm that I know of
would be goqsane.
Enlighten me of the misbehaviour of marvel please? calling
someone an idiot does not count in my bank, which is all
I\'ve heard so far..
And I give cred to the EQL-admins for putting up with all
the whine from players who still keep coming back to their
league and whine season after season!
#21 2008-07-05 02:38 by marv (82.33.87.XXX)
i thank the admins too because they have kept this tourney
flowing. i still dont agree with my mates ban because its
art rather than breaking the rules and sadly the message is
real. im absolutely astonished that teams refuse to play us
because of me! anyway as stated before i wont take part
anymore so hopefully there will be no problems getting this
final played. still unaware of the big impact ive made but
i dont care anymore i wont participate in the future.
#22 2008-07-05 02:46 by marv (82.33.87.XXX)
i would like to know who mort is also to profile me goqsane
and embeh in that manner 'little pricks' im sure he has a
small nob step up on irc sir ill be glad of ur input.
#23 2008-07-18 18:15 by mushi (194.65.103.XXX)
marvel is mad now
:)
marvel was my mate in defs, he and batfink were our top
players. but he wouldnt stop acting lame and one day Konk
kicked them from the can in a unanimous decision.
it was just a matter of time until a "real"
consequence was taken.
respectfully,
mushisan!
#24 2008-07-18 18:17 by mushi (194.65.103.XXX)
oh, and marvel isnt alone in the lamer-world. he has at
least one very annoying friend that i cant define exactly
who he is because of the constant fakenicking!
respectfully,
mushisan!
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.