.: Played Games
Playoffs Division 2Fraggers United vs Segfaulters
2 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2009-06-08 Comments: 7 Today: 0
Fraggers United-Segfaulters 165-228 @ DM2
Fraggers United-Segfaulters 147-254 @ E1M2
Fraggers United-Segfaulters 147-144 @ DM3
Fraggers United-Segfaulters 179-110 @ DM3
Fraggers United-Segfaulters 138-250 @ E1M2
Playoffs Division 3Quinas vs Boomstick Ownator`s
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2009-05-27 Comments: 20 Today: 0
Quinas-Boomstick Ownator`s 141-170 @ DM2
Quinas-Boomstick Ownator`s 147-164 @ E1M2
Quinas-Boomstick Ownator`s 171-89 @ DM3
Quinas-Boomstick Ownator`s 185-137 @ E1M2
Quinas-Boomstick Ownator`s 309-46 @ DM2
Playoffs Division 1the Viper Squad vs Druidz
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2009-05-24 Comments: 9 Today: 0
the Viper Squad-Druidz 266-96 @ DM3
the Viper Squad-Druidz 318-128 @ DM2
the Viper Squad-Druidz 249-205 @ E1M2
Playoffs Division 2Demolition Crew vs Segfaulters
2 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2009-05-22 Comments: 4 Today: 0
Demolition Crew-Segfaulters 180-132 @ DM3
Demolition Crew-Segfaulters 299-94 @ DM2
Demolition Crew-Segfaulters 163-215 @ E1M2
Demolition Crew-Segfaulters 190-242 @ E1M2
Demolition Crew-Segfaulters 121-191 @ DM2
Playoffs Division 3Quinas vs Fallen Angels
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2009-05-20 Comments: 7 Today: 0
Quinas-Fallen Angels 138-154 @ DM3
Quinas-Fallen Angels 207-162 @ E1M2
Quinas-Fallen Angels 153-144 @ DM2
Quinas-Fallen Angels 165-134 @ DM2
Playoffs Division 2Fraggers United vs Apocalypse 2000
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2009-05-18 Comments: 9 Today: 0
Fraggers United-Apocalypse 2000 210-127 @ DM2
Fraggers United-Apocalypse 2000 160-250 @ E1M2
Fraggers United-Apocalypse 2000 153-132 @ DM3
Fraggers United-Apocalypse 2000 172-249 @ E1M2
Fraggers United-Apocalypse 2000 223-128 @ DM2
Playoffs Division 3Boomstick Ownator`s vs Comfortably Numb
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2009-05-17 Comments: 6 Today: 0
Boomstick Ownator`s-Comfortably Numb 172-128 @ DM3
Boomstick Ownator`s-Comfortably Numb 248-118 @ DM2
Boomstick Ownator`s-Comfortably Numb 169-160 @ E1M2
Playoffs Division 1the Viper Squad vs Clan Malfunction
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2009-05-18 Comments: 31 Today: 0
the Viper Squad-Clan Malfunction 395-86 @ DM2
the Viper Squad-Clan Malfunction 292-77 @ DM3
the Viper Squad-Clan Malfunction 260-137 @ E1M2
Playoffs Division 3Quinas vs Tactical Powerless Amebas
1 - 0

Game info

Reported: 1970-01-01 Comments: 2 Today: 0
Playoffs Division 3Boomstick Ownator`s vs In a Blaze
1 - 0

Game info

Reported: 1970-01-01 Comments: 2 Today: 0
.: Upcoming games
No matches have been played so far.
.: the Viper Squad vs Clan Malfunction
Playoffs Division 1Reported: 2009-05-18 21:32Week: 13
.: Played Maps
DM2 - Claustrophobolis
the Viper Squad: 395Clan Malfunction: 86
548.jpg
Submitted data
Milton114
Ihminen111
XantoM90
blAze80
hlt39
fifi30
mazer15
fix2
Map Statistics:
No statistics availible

DM3 - The Abandoned Base
the Viper Squad: 292Clan Malfunction: 77
549.jpg
Submitted data
Milton85
Ihminen74
blAze73
XantoM60
fifi24
hlt23
fix19
mazer11
Map Statistics:
No statistics availible

E1M2 - Castle of the Damned
the Viper Squad: 260Clan Malfunction: 137
550.jpg
Submitted data
Milton78
XantoM72
Ihminen57
blAze53
fifi47
mem34
fix29
hlt27
Map Statistics:
No statistics availible

.: Comments
Pages: 1 | Previous Next | Total of 31 comments | First Last comment first

#1 2009-05-18 23:44 by Eta-bETa (81.236.18.XXX)

Hmmmm... Sure missed those games! :\\\

#2 2009-05-19 08:03 by JohnNy_cz (78.128.193.XXX)

A couple of fullstartinen :E

#3 2009-05-19 08:57 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

Yes, real unfortunate starts there :( on dm3 tvs got quad, ring, pent and rl. On dm2 the got both of the rls. Kinda felt like it was sr playing :E

#4 2009-05-19 09:07 by Kwibus (62.41.97.XXX)

ouch:(

It hurts to see CMF get obliterated like this. Makes me cry ...

#5 2009-05-19 10:12 by Hooraytio (89.160.23.XXX)

ggs

gonna be fun to watch the finals

#6 2009-05-19 11:16 by serox (85.118.17.XXX)

TVS are at the highest level any QW team has ever been.

#7 2009-05-19 11:23 by blAze (83.102.10.XXX)

It sure paid off taking a Swede into the team: out of 3 starts, 3 fullstarts. :P

ggs.

#8 2009-05-19 11:32 by marklar (157.24.14.XXX)

our swede can speak finnish so his fullstartpowers were no match for yours, on e1m2 it was just "ei kahta ilman kolmatta" -situation

#9 2009-05-19 11:37 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

serox.. imo the current top-team of all eras has always been at the highest level any QW team has been on since the scene keeps developing forward in skill all the time.

But ye I agree they would prolly beat old teams if they came back today.

Its fun thou to think about some imaginary matchups..
the team that would have the biggest chance i think is maybe a LA coming back and pracing for a while, or FOM.

#10 2009-05-19 11:40 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

in the other hand... if we win the final then that should make US the highest level team!? :)

#11 2009-05-19 12:21 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

that's right razor, so you better start practising! when is the final? sunday plz?

#12 2009-05-19 12:25 by blAze (83.102.10.XXX)

The final is set to start on Sunday 20:30 cet.

#13 2009-05-19 13:02 by finfun (91.156.145.XXX)

Maybe mem should have played in more than 1 map?:( i was hoping a more tighter match between these two but tVS seems to be in monster shape. GL dRZ!! :E:E:E:E:E:E:E:E:E: omg its gonna be a rape.

#14 2009-05-20 12:10 by serox (85.118.17.XXX)

Razor, goodluck:D

You do not get many opportunities against TVS so make use of anything advantages you get:p

Milton is on fire and a machine for quad form start to finish.

#15 2009-05-20 13:03 by finfun (91.156.145.XXX)

Replying to #6. It must seem that tVS is the best qw team EVER but lets not forget that status in div1 right now is not good. tVS has the best players and they prac the most so thats why they are so overpowering. f0m,LA or even Koff would have a very good chance beating tVS if only active. Would be interesting to see tVS vs some kind dreamteam and what would be the outcome.

#16 2009-05-21 15:58 by progamer (193.209.106.XXX)

hahah... tVS isn't even close to old f0m,la,sr,cmf. Too low skill. They would definately end up #5 against those. And easily even lower without XantoM.

#17 2009-05-21 19:21 by glt (83.5.132.XXX)

#16 ...or even closer to Z, FF etc. it doesn't matter what would happen, the fact is tVS are fockin ace right now! why do the most whine come from fakers :/ ?

#18 2009-05-21 20:17 by Hagge (90.225.107.XXX)

those comments probably comes from someone in la or fom that doesn\'t want to face the facts :E

#19 2009-05-21 22:18 by justsaying ;) (91.156.145.XXX)

Facts? Fact is that div1 is fucking pathetic right now. Who's active? TVS is active! Im just so sad to see this scene dominated by one clan. It isnt the same when FF or SR dominated, then the level of div1 was so high and we saw tight and good matches. Its all in the past and yes tVS is fucking ace right now. Hope to see someone ending their reign next season or something.

#20 2009-05-21 22:46 by blAze (94.237.87.XXX)

Hagge nah, according to the ip they're from a fellow finn in a certain city. Not surprising as finns are famous for their jealousy. :)

Also our so called "activity" is mostly an urban legend. If you look at played games at qw stats for example: fifi 518, hlt 708, me 606, milton 926 etc.

As for the above mentioned teams, some of them barely managed to win us when we were playing with lineups not even half as good as now.

#21 2009-05-21 23:06 by nitram (83.226.188.XXX)

There's no reason to respond to the critics blAze, it's the same every year when the activity in the scene drops, same thing happened to us in 2005 when we won everything, people were saying LA, sr whatever would rape us any given day.

People need to realize that without some activity none of the older clans would stand a chance against todays TVS, and besides, it's a privilege that a clan as old as TVS is still playing the game, can't people understand that? Sounds to me like some people see tvs as some newstarted clan that doesnt deserve any of this.

IMO, they deserve it all, great guys, great players. Always a pleasure playing them, even back in the days.

#22 2009-05-21 23:27 by blAzr (94.237.87.XXX)

Hey martin, you're a rare quest in qw scene these days. I hope you're not planning a f0m comeback because Viktor is ours now! :P

And yeah, these x would win y discussions are probably as old as the game itself. :)

#23 2009-05-22 00:10 by stick åt helvete (212.37.117.XXX)

demos?

#24 2009-05-22 10:28 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

well said valla :) i agree.
the winning team should always get credit.. otherwise whats the point..

#25 2009-05-22 12:57 by nitram (131.116.254.XXX)

haha no worries blaze, I don't plan on coming back any time soon tbh, but you never know ;-)

and i'm not sure how likely a fom comeback would be, I'd probably end up somewhere else if I decided to start playing active again.

#26 2009-05-22 13:27 by marklar (84.250.148.XXX)

plz take the whine somewhere else, tvs already admitted they won due to lucky starts!!

btw. 95% of our qw is 2on2 so i wouldnt put that much weight into any stats :)

#27 2009-05-22 16:40 by blAze (94.237.87.XXX)

95% of my qw is pov and mix. :P ca, duel, mix, 2on2, it's all quake.

#28 2009-05-22 17:44 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

95% of the times i play with keyboard.. plus i havent played since -99

#29 2009-05-22 17:53 by marklar (84.250.148.XXX)

yeah sure, but theoretically you could also say tf and ctf is all quake too :)

by looking at the stats page, you guys all have over 200 rounds of 4on4 whereas ours vary between 31 and 75..

just saying since you brought it up yourself.. not trying to take anything away from your domination the last few years but some perspective should be maintained :)

#30 2009-05-22 22:17 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

I\'m better than you all anyways, if I only had other teammates.... :(

#31 2009-05-22 22:28 by blAze (94.237.87.XXX)

Yeah I play a lot of mixeds (pretty much only form of QW I play besides officials), but does that mean I'm "more active" than someone who plays equal amount of duels or 2on2?

And sure tf and ctf are quake too, and I wouldn't say they're necessarily bad ways to keep your touch. Certainly better than not playing at all I think. :)


Showing Page 1 of 1
A total of 31 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Verification imageCode from image aboveNameComment
.: Poll
There are no polls.
Poll list
.: Menu
Content
  • News
  • Forum
  • Players
  • Teams
  • Played Games
  • Statistics - Frags
  • Statistics - Maps
  • News archive
  • Admins
  • Rules
Divisions
  • Division 1
  • Division 2
  • Division 3
  • Playoffs Division 1
  • Playoffs Division 2
  • Playoffs Division 3
.: Columns
  • (14 Mar) zappater
.: Seasons
  • European Quake League 1
  • European Quake League 2
  • European Quake League 3
  • European Quake League 4
  • European Quake League 5
  • European Quake League 6
  • European Quake League 7
  • European Quake League 8
  • European Quake League 9
  • European Quake League 10
  • European Quake League 11
  • European Quake League 12
  • European Quake League 13
  • European Quake League 14
.: External
    Get Started
  • nQuake
    News & Stuff
  • Quakeworld.nu
  • Quakeworld.ru
  • Quaddicted
  • Besmella-Quake
  • Quake Brazil
  • Challenge-TV
  • Quake Servers
  • Goldrush (betting)
    Tournaments
  • Ownage
  • QW Kenya Collective
Additional work done by PreMorteM and Zalon.
If you want to use any material on this site you'll have to contact Åke Vader.
All material on this site is copyrighted and protected by law.