| Playoffs Division 2 | Fraggers United vs Segfaulters | 2 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 3 | Quinas vs Boomstick Ownator`s | 3 - 2
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 1 | the Viper Squad vs Druidz | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 2 | Demolition Crew vs Segfaulters | 2 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 3 | Quinas vs Fallen Angels | 3 - 1
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 2 | Fraggers United vs Apocalypse 2000 | 3 - 2
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 3 | Boomstick Ownator`s vs Comfortably Numb | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 1 | the Viper Squad vs Clan Malfunction | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 3 | Quinas vs Tactical Powerless Amebas | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
| Playoffs Division 3 | Boomstick Ownator`s vs In a Blaze | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
| E1M2 - Castle of the Damned | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear Beer Balalaika: 216 | Clan Malfunction: 176 | ||||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||||
| Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Map Statistics: | |||||||||||||||||
View detailed map statistics | |||||||||||||||||
| DM2 - Claustrophobolis | |||||||||||||||||
| Bear Beer Balalaika: 172 | Clan Malfunction: 146 | ||||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||||
| Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Map Statistics: | |||||||||||||||||
View detailed map statistics | |||||||||||||||||
#1 2009-03-12 23:27 by glt (83.5.172.XXX)
1st. oO
#2 2009-03-13 08:45 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
no hlt, no win :( demos?
#3 2009-03-13 14:37 by spec (77.79.151.XXX)
h
ttp://challenge-tv.com//index.php/demos/view/36097
#4 2009-03-14 09:28 by razor (83.250.106.XXX)
28 vs 38? cmf you need to learn to be more lame and demand
equal pings!
nice victory by 3b thou!
#5 2009-03-14 11:25 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
cmf has never been known to care too much about pings :)
where was the game played anyway? on the new moscow server?
because I think on the st petersburg one all cmf'ers should
have 26? and the pings would be more fair!
#6 2009-03-14 14:45 by markku (83.145.238.XXX)
gulps
#7 2009-03-14 16:36 by B1aze (91.76.220.XXX)
We planned to play with Bulat instead of me and he had ping
70 on that server. But finally he got pl and I replace him.
#8 2009-04-25 09:38 by JohnNy_cz (78.128.193.XXX)
You cant allow 13 ms player play against 4 39 ms players
ffs.
Showing Page 1 of 1
A total of 8 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.
Poll list
- European Quake League 1
- European Quake League 2
- European Quake League 3
- European Quake League 4
- European Quake League 5
- European Quake League 6
- European Quake League 7
- European Quake League 8
- European Quake League 9
- European Quake League 10
- European Quake League 11
- European Quake League 12
- European Quake League 13
- European Quake League 14
- Get Started
- nQuake
- News & Stuff
- Quakeworld.nu
- Quakeworld.ru
- Quaddicted
- Besmella-Quake
- Quake Brazil
- Challenge-TV
- Quake Servers
- Goldrush (betting)
- Tournaments
- Ownage
- QW Kenya Collective