2 new server stations

2006-01-08 06:10 by sassa

Got new servers in Sweden and Denmark

Endpoint
(2x100mbit dedicated fiber in G?teborg)
1on1 servers: qw.endpoint.nu:28101-28102
2on2 servers: qw.endpoint.nu:28201-28201
4on4 servers: qw.endpoint.nu:27500-27501
Qizmo: qw.endpoint.nu:28000

Intarweb
(40 mbit connection in Copenhagen)
Allround: intarweb.dk:27500
Qizmo: intarweb.dk:27501

I got the servers.txt updated
(put it in ur ID1 folder and write exec servers.txt in qw)
comment ur pings/routing and what qizmo is best to the servers etc

---

Comments

#1 2006-01-08 11:26 by dje

endpoint, 12 ms, is great. i got 52 to intarweb, 25 thru g2nq (when its not lagged). gg on both servers!

#2 2006-01-08 11:43 by Diki

Endpoint 38ms from finland
Intraweb 33ms

#3 2006-01-08 11:48 by Hagge

sweet 9-10 ping on the gothenburger server! like 60 to endpoint though, but guess I'll get 26 (maybe even 13?) with get2netqizmo!

#4 2006-01-08 13:32 by manny

45ms to intarweb from uk
52ms through g2n (eh?)

64ms to endpoint
52 through g2n

:cry:

#5 2006-01-08 13:36 by gaz

I have the same point to intarweb as I do to g2n, which is handy as it gives me a stable ping to wargamez. Maybe when my ISP fixes my routing that means I can get 39ms on wargamez and 52ms on IOP again.

#6 2006-01-08 13:36 by gaz

point=ping

#7 2006-01-08 13:36 by cpe

50+ to intarweb from poland (i have 40-45 on wargamez)

70+ to endpoint - typical ping to .se from .pl

#8 2006-01-08 13:37 by cpe

that was direct connection

#9 2006-01-08 13:49 by moris

38 EP direct
38 Intra direct, i have 25 direct to wargamez tho, so its 25 via splatter to intra anyway :)

#10 2006-01-08 16:23 by murdoc

bg on both servers :[

42 in dos (51 in qw) to endpoint .se
109 in dos (115 in qw) to intarweb .dk

#11 2006-01-08 16:31 by murdoc

38 to both servers with fb0 qizmo. best i can get

#12 2006-01-08 16:47 by Jenna15

38ms on ep
and 28ms on intra

ep is shite atleast from finland..

#13 2006-01-08 17:44 by zaiko

endpoint compared to dvdalright servers:
[ping] ep vs iop: 23ms - 7ms
[ingame] ep vs iop: 26ms - 13ms

also had 1 pl ingame at ep, tried one dvdalright qizmo but pl was still there
other observations: i have better ping to both wargamez.dk and ex.fi than to endpoint :/

intarweb compared to wargamez:
[ping] iw vs wg: 26ms - 20ms
[ingame] iw vs wg: ~29ms - 25ms

obviously wargamez is better than intarweb (for me atleast)

conclusion: i'll keep on using iop and wargamez to sweden and denmark, and i could just play on ex.fi or wg instead of ep because of the packet loss :/
i live about 18 swedish miles above stockholm in sweden

good initiative to put more qw-servers up though

#14 2006-01-08 18:42 by splash

7ms to ep
5ms to ig

#15 2006-01-08 19:08 by disconnect

about Endpoint servers:
why they fuck you use mvdsv 0.172 beta? Use 0.177 plz. 0.18 and 0.19 a bit buggy and suitable only for localhost usage.

#16 2006-01-08 19:44 by Hagge

men lol sluta skryt splash :EEE

#17 2006-01-08 20:21 by disconnect

same at Intarweb - very old mvdsv

#18 2006-01-08 20:30 by ui

52 to intarweb, 26 to endpoint - from southern .se. I usually have 11-13 on wargamez... :/

#19 2006-01-08 22:04 by phrenic

55 to intra, 38 to endpoint .. sucky servers.

#20 2006-01-08 22:14 by sassa

the intar server got some routing problem, sometimes, try to use the g2nQizmo or other qizmos!!

#15 Im looking into that as we speak

#21 2006-01-11 14:31 by Kas

This servers sux, cos it need to became admin before every game for turning off fallbunny. Lame admins try for force qw players to play with this settings :( .
Why not jawnmode?

---