Comments

#1 2006-02-14 22:13 by TheEvilDog (81.233.122.XXX)

Nice when LS is using 2 unlisted players!

#2 2006-02-14 22:15 by LILLD (83.226.58.XXX)

no doubt about it =E manner where

#3 2006-02-14 22:29 by ?ke Vader (217.210.103.XXX)

When i confirmed this game i didn't notice that LS used unlisted players due to the system showing all players from LS, even those not yet approved. I have decided to issue Losers Squadron a warning for using these two unlisted players. I'm not sure if they tried to add them before or after the game.

A reminder to all clans: always check before a game that the new additions to your clan has been approved and that all players on the opposing team are listed.

Cheers.

#4 2006-02-14 22:52 by Haggis (80.202.50.XXX)

Hixo is the shit, i guess he's one of the unlisted. But ZOMG performance by TCO on e1m2. I know it's a team effort, but that amount of frags make you think "damn, this guy has to be Hagge fakenicking!"

#5 2006-02-14 23:25 by TheEvilDog (81.233.122.XXX)

Something must change with the rules, I mean a "warning"? So what, nothing happens, lets say a team has a crucial match that will decide if they are going to playoffs or not. And they let a div1 player join and win the match and they get away with a warning? It's like "oh we let dag join our team so we can win that match and have fun in playoffs". Im not saying hixo and binonic is like dag and yes maybe ls was adding them, but they were not aproved by the admins and listed and that's the point. So in further matches maybe some other punishment then "warning" should be taken, rematch or whatever, I can't see the "warning" system efficient. Im not mad at LS I just think the rules are kinda unclear in some perspectives.

#6 2006-02-14 23:27 by TheEvilDog (81.233.122.XXX)

Feel free to share your opinion

#7 2006-02-14 23:32 by dje (194.47.63.XXX)

i agree with you TED. 2 unlisted players is in the same game is quite serious, but it's not exactly the same as using a div1 player such as dag since he has played games for la. i assume these players haven't played for any other clans, but i still think just a warning is kind of a weak "punishment".

#8 2006-02-14 23:39 by TheEvilDog (81.233.122.XXX)

I just took dag because he is well known, the point still is that unlisted players can change the outcome dramaticly. And the team gets away with a warning.

#9 2006-02-15 00:13 by Term (85.226.178.XXX)

Don't play vs unlisted players!

#10 2006-02-15 00:30 by gaz (84.12.26.XXX)

Term: It's all very well saying that, but it's not the clans job to police it - it's YOUR'S. It's even on your rules page that you shouldn't play with a player who is waiting for admin confirmation.

#11 2006-02-15 03:39 by nle (80.203.114.XXX)

LOL, seriously!

who is the div1 player, name one of those who played, and ?ke, we tried before. Both of those who got to try is former (1.5 year ago) qw players, and is not, imo div1 players, not at all. TED, ofc you use this as an explanation to your loss, but to point out one of these as a div1 player, GG, great sprit, you are the win!

#12 2006-02-15 03:40 by nle (80.203.114.XXX)

and btw, bionic13 is norwegian.

#13 2006-02-15 04:00 by TiMMi (80.202.209.XXX)

Im so sorry. Naille are drung. So am I.
If you want rematch Im happy to give it to you!
We want 2-0. Hopefully obv and SD wants rematch too.
Anyway, bio and hixo was attempted added 2h before the match. We tried to come in contact with an admin. Since we know them irl and intend to let them play in future matches, we didnt care if they where "officially" added.
Since you lost I can understand that you grip onto this last sort of "hope". For whom it may concern: Call a REMATCH. I wanna play and win 2-0!

#14 2006-02-15 06:00 by TheEvilDog (81.233.122.XXX)

nle: and where did I point one of your players as a div1 player? If you can't see that i wrote an example, then your stupid.

You still don't get the point, so sad. It's not about our game, it's about the punishment system for further games. Get sober and try understad what my point is.

#15 2006-02-15 06:36 by persu (85.225.45.XXX)

Nu vart du eid gutten !

#16 2006-02-15 08:18 by Smala (195.196.95.XXX)

LS played really good :E and TCO IS SO IMBA ON E1M2 PLZ B>>>>

#17 2006-02-15 08:57 by Haggis (62.101.203.XXX)

I can understand JMK's frustration here as long as these players were unlisted. But there are a couple of factors to take in to consideration here. They claim they tried to get a hold of an admin before the game to add those players before the game and if that had been possible JMK still would have lost. But since they were not added according to rules, then they should'nt have played (if "the get a hold of admin" part is correct that is)

If these players are div 1 or 5 isn't really the point here, the rules are.
JMK probably saw from the last couple of LS matches that they had a chance vs LS and i can understand them being upset when the LS they face is a "new" stronger LS.

But aside that, great to see both Hixo and Bionic in action again :)

And TED, take TiMMi on his word, do a rematch. At least we demo-whores would love it.

Hagge, what are your comments on this one? Why are you lagging behind

#18 2006-02-15 12:27 by PreMorteM (129.241.143.XXX)

I added those two players before the match. Tho' they were not approved i guess. I really did'nt think about that, i guessed they just had to be added. sorry

#19 2006-02-15 12:29 by PreMorteM (129.241.143.XXX)

i notice that they both were approved, so i guess i was alright then. Whats the difference. Would jmk not have played if they knew hixo and bionic13 was gonna play??

#20 2006-02-15 12:30 by haggis (80.203.114.XXX)

How the hell can you say we have a stronger team? Hixo had before last nights game played 3 maps qw in 1.5 years, and about thomas, i dont think he has played qw for like 2-3 years, wow FTW it seems!

#21 2006-02-15 12:45 by Haggis (62.101.203.XXX)

Stop faking as me Pre, i know you dig me, but this gotta stop or I'll call the cops :D
Didn't know Hixo was awol for so long, but anyway, he doesnt really weaken the team. But as you say, they were both approved, so the discussion ends there really and it's GG and LS ftw :)

#22 2006-02-15 12:46 by Haggis (62.101.203.XXX)

omfg, nalle that is. It's still to early for me :D

#23 2006-02-15 12:46 by nle (80.203.114.XXX)

LOL, that was me haggis, sorry. Had so much on my mind, that i belived i was you!:(

#24 2006-02-15 12:47 by lib (213.100.62.XXX)

for fucks sake read what ted wrote instead of getting your knickers in a twist about a rematch that noone has suggested. all he said was that the current system is too weak in handling rulebreaking. if you cant read what is actually written and instead make up what you think is there you just need to shut the fuck up

(and i'm actually on jokkmokks side in a conflict? oh the humanity)

#25 2006-02-15 12:48 by Haggis (62.101.203.XXX)

I belive im Hagge, so no-one is perfect :)

#26 2006-02-15 12:49 by nle (80.203.114.XXX)

Oh the drudgery!

#27 2006-02-15 12:50 by Haggis (62.101.203.XXX)

Lib: yeah, you should read, as PreMortem just stated both players was approved :D

#28 2006-02-15 12:59 by ?ke Vader (217.210.103.XXX)

Those two players were not approved when the game had been played. I approved them afterwards.

#29 2006-02-15 13:34 by Haggis (62.101.203.XXX)

The drama will not end :)

#30 2006-02-15 13:58 by lib (213.100.62.XXX)

gg haggis

#31 2006-02-15 14:15 by Haggis (62.101.203.XXX)

lib. Make love, not flamewar :P

#32 2006-02-15 15:04 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)

hehe sorry for my late respond to this Haggis, but I've been really busy with school. :( of course it's optimal to have the players added to the list, but the game is about fun(?) so I don't really see any problems.. if they hadn't gotten approved by the admins afterwards it would've been a whole different thing I guess, but now they did.

Therefor all I have to say is: GG. Really seems like a great game with TCO taking out his wrath on us poor swedes as usual :( hixo and b13 are great additions and hopefully we will see some more activity from the norweigans (and wannabe-norbaggen hixo) from here on.. I really wanna see what they can do in div1 once more \o/

#33 2006-02-15 15:37 by TiMMi (80.202.209.XXX)

Just you wait.. We're like Norwegians in the Olympics.. We come by every other year, and wtfpwn the world!
Alltho we failed on one part; We havent pracced so we have some startup flaws. LS will win NQR9!

#34 2006-02-15 16:23 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)

tell me if u need one more member timmi :o)

#35 2006-02-15 19:09 by TiMMi (80.202.209.XXX)

Norwegians only! Only 1 mascot allowed. :)

#36 2006-02-15 20:44 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)

how ego :( what if I change nationality?? :(

#37 2006-02-15 20:55 by xachariah (85.138.70.XXX)

where were these games played? liked to get a hold on some demos :o

tco > jmk ;)

#38 2006-02-15 22:12 by Term (85.226.178.XXX)

#10 and we don't? I bet noone will claim that the rules are too weak when the first div1-2 clan is disqualified.

#39 2006-02-15 22:14 by Haggis (80.202.50.XXX)

hagge: lets change nicks, then they will take you for a .no player. Just remember to play really bad, or else you will give yourself away to easily!!

#40 2006-02-15 23:43 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)

hehe that could work, but there is one problem.. I can't play bad!!! :(

#41 2006-02-16 07:02 by b13 (80.202.83.XXX)

Hey everyone!