Comments

#1 2006-02-02 22:49 by Anza (80.222.234.XXX)

Hagge is way2ez

#2 2006-02-02 22:50 by phrenic (81.229.7.XXX)

not even #2

#3 2006-02-02 22:53 by xachariah (85.138.70.XXX)

ggs!

#4 2006-02-02 23:17 by fifi (84.230.198.XXX)

Since pretty much everyone thought we would win this in two maps with frag margin surpassing 300 in each round i feel the need to make some excuses...

dm3 - The Riker Spaceship

in the start la picks up rl and also lg, which is the most important item on this map. with those they hold a maplock for nearly 45seconds until I take out the whole la team. after that it's walk in the park and I let angua climb fragrank side by side with riker. credits also to archi whose frags made us win by 29 instead of 3

e1m2 - Riker's playground

we did a quick marketing research before this round and found out that the spectators wanted to see dm2 as well, so that's about it.

dm2 - Rikerpolis

we get almost full start with all the cool weapons like ssg ng and upper rl. we manage to hold riker back for 15mins but then it's just too much, he kills our rl guys and then nabbe takes all spawnfrags. our maplock is opened and even rock manages to kill a few spawns riker gave him.

all in all, i guess our team, like the spectators, underestimated la. they played quite good together for a group that has been a team for like a week. also their invidual skill was way higher which showed especially in e1m2. g v g

#5 2006-02-02 23:21 by mogge (83.177.105.XXX)

heh.. nice report there fifi. "..and even rock manages to kill a few spawns riker gave him" *haha*

#6 2006-02-02 23:25 by hejsan_ (80.75.28.XXX)

demos?

#7 2006-02-02 23:31 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)

it really sucks that only 4 goes to playoffs, since now we probably won't see cmf there :( sniff! seems like a really great game though.. and I'm still waiting for cmf to take me into their mighty squad :(

#8 2006-02-02 23:45 by Sassa (213.113.96.XXX)

haha great report fifi!!

#9 2006-02-03 00:18 by gaz (84.12.189.XXX)

DM3 was all LA until 5 minutes in when Riker kindly decided to quad teamkill ring-Nabbe. Nabbe dropped a pack, and Riker then did a spectacular bore in RA tunnel. CMF got both packs and the rest is history :D

#10 2006-02-03 00:54 by ihme (213.67.7.XXX)

thx gaz.. riker still says it was enemy ring

#11 2006-02-03 03:42 by fix (88.113.196.XXX)

fifi was @ ra top already with rl by that time and angua was coming from ya side...where the pack went...i dont know i didnt get em atleast..maybe archi did but died right after..as i dont recall him having a rl untill later on :P

#12 2006-02-03 10:53 by riker (81.228.158.XXX)

i was tired and saw doubble, so i thought i could make 2 TKS with 1 quad rl on nabbe at ring

#13 2006-02-03 10:56 by riker (81.228.158.XXX)

the only thing kept me awake was that i was boosting this awesome song in the love of my captain @ winamp -> http://picardy.ytmnd.com/

#14 2006-02-03 11:23 by mipa (80.186.154.XXX)

fifi faked as siv again in dm2 for 19.9min plz ban cmf or at least reduce their points by 10

#15 2006-02-03 13:35 by Player (83.132.210.XXX)

they are both cmf whats the problem?

#16 2006-02-03 14:45 by murdoc (84.53.64.XXX)

maybe cuz its in the rulez?

Fakenicking:

Fakenicking is not allowed, even if the fakenicking player is listed on the clans roster but under a different nick. A player has to play with the nick he's listed as on the teams roster or else the clan will receive a warning. Using a fake nick in matches will be treated as using a unlisted player. The first time it happends the team will be warned and the second time the team will be disqualified (removed from EQL)

#17 2006-02-03 14:46 by menth0l (195.163.188.XXX)

lighten the fuck up please

#18 2006-02-03 15:51 by murdoc (84.53.64.XXX)

hehe i really don't give a shit, everyone knows that it was fifi faking the last map as siv for fun but hey, obey the rulez (c) ParadokS :/

#19 2006-02-03 16:31 by fix (88.113.196.XXX)

shut the fuck up:

.: Viewing clan
Name:
Clan MalFunction
Comments from EQL:
This clan has behaved well in EQL so far.

^__^ ,\/..

#20 2006-02-03 16:35 by murdoc (84.53.64.XXX)

@_@

#21 2006-02-03 17:59 by mipa (80.186.154.XXX)

probably not doing anything about the fakenicking since it would cause a huge amount of flaming.. i dont think anyone really cares about the fakenicking itself but they still played against the rules! cmf out

#22 2006-02-03 23:14 by demos (146.102.98.XXX)

DEMOS?

#23 2006-02-04 16:22 by Anza (80.222.234.XXX)

It was actually me faking as Siv, now what are you gonna do about that?!?

#24 2006-02-05 08:36 by fix (88.113.196.XXX)

we didnt know this, ban fu!