#1 2007-04-12 23:31 by LethalWiz (85.227.166.XXX)

GG, really GG!

#2 2007-04-12 23:32 by moris (84.42.163.XXX)

die fckrs, i had all my playmoney chips on you fcktards :-\\\\\\\\\\\

#3 2007-04-13 02:23 by cpe (158.75.218.XXX)

OMG!! THIS GAME WAS FIXed !! anyway, GG's CMF !

#4 2007-04-13 08:23 by murdoc (81.171.23.XXX)

gg's cmf, it where fun games for me !

#5 2007-04-13 11:27 by fix (88.192.210.XXX)

gg smurremon

#6 2007-04-13 12:00 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

the end of an sr-era? :EEE gg cmf!

#7 2007-04-13 16:53 by faustov (83.5.145.XXX)

wtf lol gg stupid sr for ruining my 100$ bet on you :<<<<

#8 2007-04-13 17:34 by gg (130.233.243.XXX)

Ping whine for teh win!

40 minutes of whine must be some kind of a record for a group game...

#9 2007-04-13 19:38 by Keyser (87.127.77.XXX)

woohoo! CMF! skillz. murlegs and insaleg.
pld cmf!

#10 2007-04-14 13:00 by marklar (80.221.235.XXX)

After a rollercoaster season (0-2 losses vs aq and sd, 2-1 wins vs koff and dag) we didn't know what to expect from this game.

On dm3 we got a great start. Besides the 2nd rl which we got with pent, we also got another when para handed his to reppie at ra. We played really good considering they got all three pents after the start.

E1M2 has traditionally been our best map, but not this season. Following a blow-out against dag this was no different. Quads 16-4 and yellow armors 35-18 to sr. They made us look really bad here :/

We get a fullstart on dm2 but reppie disconnects after 15secs so we restart. On the 2nd attempt they get the fullstart and do a good job sweeping low and holding tele. After 10 minutes the score is around 150-50 to sr when we get a lucky break. We kill their quad-dude with sg and with his rl-pack we secure tele while taking control of low-rl at the same time. There is plenty of time for us to catch up and that's just what we did o/

#11 2007-04-14 23:18 by ]SR[insane (83.27.145.XXX)

Just wanted to ask for some other admin than Sassa on next SR games....
GGs CMF

#12 2007-04-15 04:36 by sassa (85.225.114.XXX)

this was an admin decision if u didnt know!
would have had the same result with any other admin

#13 2007-04-15 04:37 by sassa (85.225.114.XXX)

more than I was in the decision

#14 2007-04-15 13:37 by murdoc (84.245.9.XXX)

still weird, why we MUST follow eql rules first, when cmf had benefid of it, after we exposed hlts ping, and the rules where in our benefid you(admins) changed the rulez so cmf had the benefid again. nice work admins :>

#15 2007-04-15 15:51 by HighlandeR (193.219.28.XXX)

the only admin decision here was regarding the minping value, and it was made by 3 of us (me, ake, sassa).

might agree or not whether the decision was correct, honestly i dont think it would anyhow affect the game if the decision was different.

except for insane's floating ping everything was fair.
we cant help insane's ping tho, as none of our desicion could have stop his ping from floating.

#16 2007-04-15 16:29 by marklar (80.221.235.XXX)

im a little disappointed you brought this up as it was a really good game.

"exposed hlts ping" ? that it was fluctuating and used qizmo to get stable 39? it's really weird that you guys have a problem with fair games and seem to think everyone else is as shady as your team.

you had xterm pinging up so the game would be played on wargamez instead of a swedish server and then start doing this shit? and even when the admins reached a decicion your team started clowning with the break/minping 0/ready thing which was really mature.

personally i thought the whole prewar episode was one of the funniest things i have ever witnessed in qw

*awaiting lies and halftruths*

#17 2007-04-15 18:27 by murdoc (84.245.9.XXX)

personnaly i don't really care about the ping, i even pinged up to 55 just to get the game started, it was just funny too see how admins suddenly changed their minds :> and the game it self was really good, queit some funny moments, but the prewar affected our game since i was pissed off cuz it was taking to long, and didn't had much time, and when the game evantually started para's mic got fuckedup again so he muted it. :/ but it still was gg's i am not blaming cmf, just wanted to point out the weird/fun decision the admins made.

#18 2007-04-15 21:16 by henri (81.197.126.XXX)

UL dave and his merry men. Nothing chances that fact. please keep spammin, wanna laugh more often.

#19 2007-04-16 11:21 by bps (83.140.153.XXX)

fifisquad for the win...

#20 2007-04-16 13:28 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

I can't really see what the whine is about? the ping looks perfectly fair to me.. that insanes ping was not stable is nothing a server change could change? where did sr want to play anyway? in poland? Be

#21 2007-04-16 16:14 by murdoc (81.171.23.XXX)

The value for the minping must not be higher than the lowest pinging player in the highest pinging team, unless both teams agree otherwise (c) eql rules. hlt had directly ping 25/30 jumping around abit, so he wanted to play with stable 38 so our 2x 25ms needed to ping up, with was not possible for para, it was 25 or 52 so we were forced to play with minping

#22 2007-04-16 16:26 by marklar (80.221.235.XXX)

if you want to state details, please be correct in doing so, he never had 25ms, insane saw his ping being 26ms (once?!?!), but mostly it was varying between 28-35.

and besides, i have really hard time believing para cant get 39ms on wargamez if he tried to :) maybe we'll just save time next time and play on swedish server if playing 39 39 39 52 vs 39 39 39 52 causes you so much pain

#23 2007-04-16 21:39 by murdoc (84.245.9.XXX)

only reason why we play on wargamez is because of insane, we all have better ping in sweden.

#24 2007-04-16 22:41 by marklar (80.221.235.XXX)

yeah i know, lets just let this die now :)

#25 2007-04-17 08:24 by murdoc (81.171.23.XXX)

okido :P

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Code from image aboveNameComment