.: Played Games
Playoff Division 5J?garna vs Div Sub-Zero
0 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2007-06-19 Comments: 6 Today: 0
J?garna-Div Sub-Zero 54-122 @ DM3
J?garna-Div Sub-Zero 156-177 @ E1M2
J?garna-Div Sub-Zero 105-207 @ DM2
Playoff Division 2Death Dealers vs Slackers II
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2007-06-18 Comments: 19 Today: 0
Death Dealers-Slackers II 104-210 @ DM3
Death Dealers-Slackers II 175-220 @ E1M2
Death Dealers-Slackers II 196-165 @ DM2
Death Dealers-Slackers II 258-89 @ DM2
Death Dealers-Slackers II 281-103 @ E1M2
Playoff Division 4SmackThatAss vs MAGNUM
2 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2007-06-04 Comments: 17 Today: 0
SmackThatAss-MAGNUM 132-176 @ CMT3
SmackThatAss-MAGNUM 163-127 @ CMT4
SmackThatAss-MAGNUM 169-129 @ DM2
SmackThatAss-MAGNUM 116-174 @ DM3
SmackThatAss-MAGNUM 132-189 @ E1M2
Playoff Division 5J?garna vs In a Blaze
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 1970-01-01 Comments: 5 Today: 0
J?garna-In a Blaze 173-109 @ DM3
J?garna-In a Blaze 153-175 @ DM2
Playoff Division 3Paranoia vs ChoseN
0 - 3

Game info

Reported: 1970-01-01 Comments: 1 Today: 0
Playoff Division 1Dota-Allstar-Guys vs Antiquad
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2007-05-28 Comments: 1 Today: 0
Playoff Division 2Death Dealers vs assassins
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2007-05-30 Comments: 15 Today: 0
Death Dealers-assassins 230-112 @ DM2
Death Dealers-assassins 153-234 @ E1M2
Death Dealers-assassins 153-149 @ DM3
Death Dealers-assassins 68-259 @ E1M2
Death Dealers-assassins 172-118 @ DM2
Playoff Division 1Dota-Allstar-Guys vs Slackers
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2007-05-28 Comments: 8 Today: 0
Dota-Allstar-Guys-Slackers 168-200 @ DM3
Dota-Allstar-Guys-Slackers 299-162 @ E1M2
Dota-Allstar-Guys-Slackers 179-171 @ DM2
Dota-Allstar-Guys-Slackers 197-149 @ DM3
Playoff Division 2Core vs Slackers II
0 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2007-05-21 Comments: 13 Today: 0
Core-Slackers II 140-162 @ DM3
Core-Slackers II 106-257 @ DM2
Core-Slackers II 186-266 @ E1M2
Playoff Division 3Ballistic vs Demolition Crew
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2007-05-20 Comments: 4 Today: 0
Ballistic-Demolition Crew 179-91 @ DM3
Ballistic-Demolition Crew 248-149 @ DM2
Ballistic-Demolition Crew 232-157 @ E1M2
.: Upcoming games
No matches have been played so far.
.: Boomstick Ownators vs Enemyquad
Division 4Reported: 2007-04-19 23:01Week: 1
.: Played Maps
DM2 - Claustrophobolis
Boomstick Ownators: 195Enemyquad: 163
184.jpg
Submitted data
bo62
Vert!GNT54
recowski41
glt38
overdose49
votary48
sailorman46
antic20
E1M2 - Castle of the Damned
Boomstick Ownators: 96Enemyquad: 214
185.jpg
Submitted data
Vert!GNT31
bo27
glt25
recowski13
votary79
overdose54
sailorman44
antic37
DM3 - The Abandoned Base
Boomstick Ownators: 77Enemyquad: 174
186.jpg
Submitted data
bo25
glt23
Vert!GNT15
recowski14
votary54
overdose45
sailorman43
antic32
.: Comments
Pages: 1 | Previous Next | Total of 4 comments | First Last comment first

#1 2007-04-20 11:26 by Smala (194.22.51.XXX)

omg, wouldve been 2-0 for eQ| if starplayer LocalGhost had played. ;<<<<<

#2 2007-04-20 15:04 by 1tsinen (83.102.43.XXX)

Votte so hot as usually :F

#3 2007-04-20 18:51 by antic (130.240.193.XXX)

DM2: Their map. Good choice by them this day. They seemed to get most low RLs and could attack water with RLs or sneak in from big to hi. They played well and our TP wasn't working as well as we had hoped. And if one player doesn't perform it's hard. Not naming any names, just saying... :)

E1M2: We went with a kind of safe bet here knowing we are strong on this map. Some whine about ffa/sg-map from BO, that's the wrong attitude if you wanna win this against us thats for sure. We gave away a few quads when we lost a couple RLs but they only had boomsticks most of the times so their quads never made it very far.

DM3: We remained in control most of the time but somehow they managed to steal pentas that should have been easy for us. They could not really hold RA so we came back from those minor setbacks.

#4 2007-04-21 12:52 by votary (85.230.26.XXX)

I had fever so a dm2 was to much for my brain I think, but at the same time we didnt manage to have our best tp maby thats why we lost 1 point. well no hard feelings anyway. ggs bo and gl in the future.


Showing Page 1 of 1
A total of 4 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Verification imageCode from image aboveNameComment
.: Poll
Are you looking forward to EQL6?
Hell yeah!
No, i only play DOTA.
What's EQL?
Created by ?ke Vader on 2007-08-21
Poll list
.: Menu
Content
  • News
  • Forum
  • Players
  • Teams
  • Played Games
  • Statistics - Frags
  • Statistics - Maps
  • News archive
  • Admins
  • Signup
  • Rules
Divisions
  • Division 1
  • Division 2
  • Division 3
  • Division 4
  • Division 5
  • Playoff Division 1
  • Playoff Division 2
  • Playoff Division 3
  • Playoff Division 4
  • Playoff Division 5
.: Columns
  • (14 Mar) Hooraytio
  • (12 Mar) term
.: Seasons
  • European Quake League 1
  • European Quake League 2
  • European Quake League 3
  • European Quake League 4
  • European Quake League 5
  • European Quake League 6
  • European Quake League 7
  • European Quake League 8
  • European Quake League 9
  • European Quake League 10
  • European Quake League 11
  • European Quake League 12
  • European Quake League 13
  • European Quake League 14
.: External
    Host
  • Fragzone
    Get Started
  • eQuake
  • Quakeworld Guide
    News & Stuff
  • Quakeworld.nu
  • Quakeworld.ru
  • QWDrama.com
  • Quaddicted
  • Besmella-Quake
  • Quake Brazil
  • Refragged
  • Challenge-TV
  • Quake Servers
  • QW SChedule
    Competitions
  • Duelmania
  • Endif QW Tournament
  • GGL Americup
  • NQR Network
  • 2 shot 2 tournament
Set up and additional work done for eql5 by PreMorteM.
If you want to use any material on this site you'll have to contact Åke Vader.
All material on this site is copyrighted and protected by law.