Playoff Division 5 | J?garna vs Div Sub-Zero | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 2 | Death Dealers vs Slackers II | 3 - 2
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 4 | SmackThatAss vs MAGNUM | 2 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 5 | J?garna vs In a Blaze | 3 - 1
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 | Paranoia vs ChoseN | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 1 | Dota-Allstar-Guys vs Antiquad | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 2 | Death Dealers vs assassins | 3 - 2
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 1 | Dota-Allstar-Guys vs Slackers | 3 - 1
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 2 | Core vs Slackers II | 0 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
Playoff Division 3 | Ballistic vs Demolition Crew | 3 - 0
|
DM3 - The Abandoned Base | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suddendeath: 147 | Clan MalFunction: 197 | ||||||||||||||||
Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
DM2 - Claustrophobolis | |||||||||||||||||
Suddendeath: 121 | Clan MalFunction: 205 | ||||||||||||||||
Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
#1 2007-04-11 17:04 by Term (85.226.178.XXX)
SD has received a first warning for having played with an at
the moment unlisted player.
#2 2007-04-11 17:15 by bps (83.140.153.XXX)
finally confirmed, after years of delay and drama. ggs cmf,
and welcome lakso to our eql-team :)
#3 2007-04-11 17:51 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
omg, trash faked as lakso? :ddd
#4 2007-04-11 20:09 by ok98 (213.64.57.XXX)
I did ad lakso as a player long before the game but they
didn accept him and we stil played the game :/ Tnx admins
for leting us continue with lakso. ggs!
#5 2007-04-11 20:47 by Hooraytio (81.232.166.XXX)
how can lakso play when he has played for osams in div2?
just curious
#6 2007-04-11 21:22 by Term (85.226.178.XXX)
I can't motivate this, we will not change the rules
midseason and any others who wanna change team midseason can
expect the same 3 weeks of admindebate.
#7 2007-04-11 22:42 by bps (83.140.153.XXX)
hooray - because he wants, and because we need the player,
and what we not need is more inactivity in the scene.
#8 2007-04-11 22:43 by ok98 (213.64.57.XXX)
Hum. Trash got laksos frags in this game :/ Can someone fix
this?
#9 2007-04-12 00:25 by ajkon (213.114.243.XXX)
whats there to fix? trash is so elite he doesnt need to play
to get frags !
#10 2007-04-12 01:05 by Hooraytio (81.232.166.XXX)
bps i said i was just curious
dont go into defense mode as soon as you start reading
comments on eql :D
i think its good that you can stay active, just wanted to
know what motivated the move
#11 2007-04-12 20:28 by ?ke Vader (82.145.146.XXX)
Note: This comment is only my personal opinion and may not
reflect what the rest of the EQL crew think of the
matter.
The reasons for approving both this game and Lakso are
obvious to me. There is a clan in the highest division of
the league that needs a player, and the clans in this
division aren't always that active even with a full squad.
As Lakso came from division 2 and wants to take a shot at
division 1, then he's more than welcome to do that imo as i
think we should promote (to some extent, of course) play in
higher divisions. To let that one single game stop Lakso
from joining SD would be quite silly imo, and this single
case isn't what this rule is meant to prevent anyway.
Imo the one-clan-only-rule is there to prevent (in the most
extreme case) players from playing all their games in one
clan, then move on to play 9 more in another clan the week
after. Sure, the action taken here was an exception to that
rule and it might or might not be changed until next season,
but imo we still need such a rule to prevent the extreme
case displayed above.
With this said, remember that this was an exception based on that "admins
knows best". :)
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.