Division 1 | KOFF vs Suddendeath | 0 - 2
| ||||||||||
Division 5 | Respawn Addicts vs Vitun Kova Bosse | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
Division 4 | SmackThatAss vs OldOnes | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
Division 4 | Chosen vs MAGNUM | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
Division 5 | Allans Vittnen vs Respawn Addicts | 1 - 2
| ||||||||||
Division 5 | Vitun Kova Bosse vs na fianna | 0 - 2
| ||||||||||
Division 5 | na fianna vs Allans Vittnen | 2 - 1
| ||||||||||
Division 4 | Pimps vs EnemyQuad | 1 - 2
| ||||||||||
Division 4 | osams vs Chosen | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
Division 1 | Slackers vs Suddendeath | 2 - 0
|
Views: 1054
Pages: 1 | Previous Next | Total of 7 comments | First Last comment first
#1 2007-11-18 23:18 by Hooraytio (89.160.23.XXX)
allow more additions for all divs plz
#2 2007-11-03 18:33 by 1tsinen (83.102.43.XXX)
B1aze: The idea of removing it came when SD had the problem
yes, but doesn't mather which clan would have had that
problem, the result would have been the same. And I
personally think it's really important to keep div1 alive.
Div1 also has lots of "come play, then
goes"-players so...
Div2: We'll try to get a lots bigger div for you next season
:)
#3 2007-11-02 14:34 by trash (195.84.68.XXX)
ofcourse blaze. we will soon get a rule saying that SD can
use aimbot to, but only against fin clans. *snyft snyft*
#4 2007-11-01 10:59 by B1aze (212.5.80.XXX)
This rule was made for Suddendeath only, right?
#5 2007-10-30 18:32 by bUn (82.117.96.XXX)
I lol:ed hard
#6 2007-10-28 23:31 by dje (85.24.188.XXX)
fair enough. now all we need is the eagerly awaited
"late team addition" rule for division 2! even in
comparison with "inactive" division 1, activity in
div 2 is a fucking joke. gg
#7 2007-10-21 23:27 by OK98 (90.225.96.XXX)
Nice. EQL OWNS :)
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.