| Division 1 | KOFF vs Suddendeath | 0 - 2
| ||||||||||
| Division 5 | Respawn Addicts vs Vitun Kova Bosse | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
| Division 4 | SmackThatAss vs OldOnes | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
| Division 4 | Chosen vs MAGNUM | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
| Division 5 | Allans Vittnen vs Respawn Addicts | 1 - 2
| ||||||||||
| Division 5 | Vitun Kova Bosse vs na fianna | 0 - 2
| ||||||||||
| Division 5 | na fianna vs Allans Vittnen | 2 - 1
| ||||||||||
| Division 4 | Pimps vs EnemyQuad | 1 - 2
| ||||||||||
| Division 4 | osams vs Chosen | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
| Division 1 | Slackers vs Suddendeath | 2 - 0
| ||||||||||
| DM3 - The Abandoned Base | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Pasaran!: 125 | Hippushnik: 122 | ||||||||||||||||
| Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| E1M2 - Castle of the Damned | |||||||||||||||||
| No Pasaran!: 156 | Hippushnik: 173 | ||||||||||||||||
| Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| DM2 - Claustrophobolis | |||||||||||||||||
| No Pasaran!: 162 | Hippushnik: 164 | ||||||||||||||||
| Submitted data | |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
#1 2007-11-04 23:32 by HighlandeR (83.20.218.XXX)
OMG that's too close to be true...
i honestly feel sorry for no!
this game reminds me about our play in previous season where
we lose quite a few games with less then 5 frags
#2 2007-11-05 00:27 by Zeppski (78.106.23.XXX)
Yep, these were horrible battles, especially decider @
dm2
Luck wasn't on our side, ggs Hippushnik
We need more practice though :)
#3 2007-11-05 10:22 by hea (82.181.196.XXX)
wtf
both teams didnt even get 130 frags on dm3!
e1m2 and dm2 are as pathetic fragwise
#4 2007-11-05 12:24 by HighlandeR (150.254.194.XXX)
judging the game based on frag count ?
common...
#5 2007-11-05 13:00 by Mingle (88.113.57.XXX)
There wasn't any map locks on any of those 3 maps for us or
no!. Maybe thats explains, why there wasn't so many frags.
Maps was very tight and every frag was important.
And I would like to say that, maybe no! lost that dm2 with 2
frags, but on another hand we lost that dm3 with 3 frags.
Maps was tigh, but maybe we was little better (read luckier
if you want) this time.
#6 2007-11-05 13:43 by HighlandeR (150.254.194.XXX)
true, but it's quite a difference to lose 1st map by 3 frags
and decider by 2 :D
#7 2007-11-05 15:32 by Skillah (217.76.20.XXX)
Why did I miss this one?
Seems like a thriller all the way :P
#8 2007-11-05 15:34 by Mingle (88.113.57.XXX)
Yeah, but if we have won that first by 3 frags, we would
have got 3 points and not 2 points and no! 0 points...
#9 2007-11-05 18:27 by HighlandeR (83.20.169.XXX)
and if no! won dm2 with 2 frags then they would have 2
points and you just one :D
this game could go either way, my point is that it's much
more painful to lose by 2 frags and thus lose whole game
then lose by 3 frags but win the the whole game after all.
#10 2007-11-05 18:56 by Mingle (88.113.57.XXX)
I would like to remind you that, if we have won that dm3 by
3 frags... there would not have been that dm2 at all :D
#11 2007-11-05 21:44 by soma (134.130.50.XXX)
Holy shit that looks hot!
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.