Premiership playoff | Firing Squad vs Fragomatic | 1 - 3 |
Premiership playoff | Fragomatic vs Suddendeath | 2 - 0 |
Premiership playoff | Firing Squad vs AntiQuad | 2 - 0 |
Qualifiers to division 2 | El?intarha vs osams | 2 - 0 |
Qualifiers to division 4 | Jebalaction vs Demolition Crew | 0 - 2 |
Qualifiers to division 4 | Quake-o-Holy vs Demolition Crew | 0 - 2 |
Qualifiers to division 3 | clan metally troopers vs Da Quaking Manjakks | 1 - 2 |
Qualifiers to division 3 | clan metally troopers vs NoNaMe | 2 - 0 |
Qualifiers to division 3 | smackthatass vs NoNaMe | 0 - 2 |
Qualifiers to division 2 | Veterans vs osams | 2 - 1 |
e1m2 | |
---|---|
Death Dealers: 157 | New Wave: 160 |
dm2 | |
Death Dealers: 219 | New Wave: 102 |
dm3 | |
Death Dealers: 181 | New Wave: 78 |
#1 2005-11-14 00:16 by Hagge
omg first comment! d2 really impresses even without billy the kid, gg!
#2 2005-11-14 00:46 by blsp
my m8s told me to hunt nmies on the last quad on e1m2 everywhere despite mh
where they hid and won :/
#3 2005-11-14 01:05 by plast
blasp whine :X
this is 4th or 5th map that we lose in eql by several frags difference, that has
to end k pls, more luck pls :B<
anyway, e1m2 was kinda funny sometimes, dm2 was ours, and dm3 would've been be
much harder if one of amd hadn't timeouted for about a minute in the middle of
the game (althrough we had ra/q control but they lost some rl or two while
playing 4/3)
billy the kid is cumming back soon :X
#4 2005-11-14 08:09 by spokz
ggs piczki <3 \o/ b<
#5 2005-11-14 09:00 by billy
nie wierze :D:D:D
#6 2005-11-14 09:01 by billy
btw div2 seems real close this season :k
#7 2005-11-14 12:16 by gaz
It's because of this silly points system - it should be 3 points per match win,
not 1 point per map win.
#8 2005-11-14 12:43 by Hagge
whine? start up nqr again then lamer :(((
#9 2005-11-14 14:57 by dje
gaz, true, but div 2 IS close in won/lost rounds as well. i mean we're in the
lead with 11-8 in rounds (i know, more games played) but other division leaders
have like 14-1, 7-2 etc :)
#10 2005-11-14 15:14 by plast
the system 'one point per map and no match winning bonus' is gr8 imho, not
silly, it makes you to fight for every map cause even if you win 2:1 it gives
your opponent one point, if the clans don't want to give important points away
they'll have to learn ALL maps, not only 2 of 3, and - the other side - the clan
known as 'one map winner' still can't win division but will be in the middle of
the table, which is good i guess...
#11 2005-11-14 16:14 by gaz
But the current system doesn't offer enough reward for the team that wins the
match overall. 3 points for a win, 1 "bonus" point for a team that takes a map
in a 2-1 defeat is a good system IMO because that way it encourages teams to win
games. A clan will place much higher by simply winning their only map and losing
2-1 using the 1 point per map system than they would under the 3-1-0 system (as
in last few NQRs).
#12 2005-11-14 18:21 by plast
that's why i prefer current system: the biggest reward for winning team is when
they win 2:0 - they got 2 points and the enemy got null, you see - now it's not
only about winning 2 maps, it's also about not loosing any, cause that one point
might be crucial in final scores :) and imho it's more fair when you have 6
points after 3 wins and 7 defeats (0:2) and in table you're below clan that won
nothing but lost 7 times 1:2 ;))
#13 2005-11-16 14:40 by Hagge
plast <3