Playoff Division 5 | Def2 vs Clan Cube Squad | 1 - 3 |
Playoff Division 3 | hippushnik vs Rebellion of Thunder | 3 - 1 |
Playoff Division 1 | koff vs Slackers | 0 - 3 |
Playoff Division 3 | Easy To Kill vs Rebellion of Thunder | 2 - 3 |
Playoff Division 1 | Slackers vs Firing Squad | 3 - 1 |
Playoff Division 5 | Def2 vs Shadow Death | 3 - 0 |
Playoff Division 4 | ChoseN vs Morituri | 3 - 1 |
Playoff Division 6 | sadtroops vs Enemy Quad | 3 - 0 |
Playoff Division 5 | The Pimps vs Clan Cube Squad | 0 - 3 |
Playoff Division 1 | koff vs Suddendeath | 3 - 0 |
#1 2006-12-10 21:45 by Defcon 5 (85.124.4.XXX)
Wow, last Map, I cant say a word. Just watch the demos.
#2 2006-12-10 21:46 by moris (84.42.163.XXX)
qw with sr is like football used to be with germany. 2 teams
frag for Yx20mins and sr win :) gratz, even tho i wanted a
5map final match :P
#3 2006-12-10 21:47 by Bobby (85.140.196.XXX)
Very nice, esp. dm3.
No slowspawning against SR!
#4 2006-12-10 22:27 by FlePser (80.60.182.XXX)
gratz ladies. =)
#5 2006-12-10 22:30 by hfg (213.216.199.XXX)
so sad =()
#6 2006-12-10 22:31 by ^ cpe (145.97.236.XXX)
castle of insane :<
#7 2006-12-10 22:41 by rwx (81.231.242.XXX)
sr suger
#8 2006-12-10 22:56 by Gamer (193.166.235.XXX)
gg sr, you deserve the win. Very impressive by insane on
e1m2
#9 2006-12-10 23:06 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
wtf, this game has to be uploaded again.. defcon 5 stole my
f?rst comment :( give it to me! grrr
#10 2006-12-11 00:12 by Grass (85.156.250.XXX)
koff oli paska :( bg miss? myllyt?
#11 2006-12-11 03:47 by plast (83.13.196.XXX)
fixed, especially dm3
;E
#12 2006-12-11 06:28 by upkeep (81.224.219.XXX)
wtf happend? some sr spawns?
#13 2006-12-11 06:44 by Anza (84.250.0.XXX)
SR misplaced?????
#14 2006-12-11 08:18 by stall (83.25.86.XXX)
Nice Insane. Own with 77 ms
#15 2006-12-11 09:29 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
insane shows all u pingwhiners how its done..
a bit boring with 3-0 tho
gl next season
#16 2006-12-11 10:26 by stv (62.112.220.XXX)
SR o/
#17 2006-12-11 11:54 by Flamer (88.100.21.XXX)
Yeah Hooray, kurwa guys are so good with those bad pings...
#18 2006-12-11 12:02 by krab (193.41.215.XXX)
Great Game !
#19 2006-12-11 12:43 by mushi (62.48.251.XXX)
seems ggs, nice insane!
#20 2006-12-11 13:36 by jebak (217.11.252.XXX)
I will kick your head out of your body, moris !
#21 2006-12-11 14:24 by tacobigcreen (85.225.142.XXX)
This is a summary of yesterday nights bigscreen commentary @
molecules own tacobar: ggs, nice played slackerinen.
expected more out of koff here, but the very strategic
mapchoice from SR broke the nerves. first dm2 as the
icebreaker - koff were too nervous to win the map as they
normally would've (SR-strat #1). secondly e1m2 coz this is
koff's weakest map, so the gap 0-2 would be stressing
(SR-strat #2). dm3 - whatta thriller! ppl just couldn't sit
down in our specroom, intensive! Congrats sr!
#22 2006-12-11 15:35 by mogge (81.234.255.XXX)
I was hoping for KOFF to win but SR stole it this time. An
impressive season for KOFF anyway, think they did a good
job. Well played :I
#23 2006-12-11 17:37 by unex (194.151.88.XXX)
@#21 e1m2 koff's weakest map? lol...
#24 2006-12-11 18:15 by murdoc (84.245.9.XXX)
ggs, thx guys! e1m2 always turns around the other way
normally cuz its our worst map! but somehow it went better
then expected
#25 2006-12-11 18:59 by too much praise (193.225.158.XXX)
i think you are a bit overrating insane's performance. true
he played well, but i dont think it would have been a bigger
rape, had he been playing with 52ms...
"insane shows all u pingwhiners how its done.."
like he had a choice about pings
#26 2006-12-11 19:03 by Bob (85.141.159.XXX)
well, he had not just 70ping, but he had constant lags &
pl. i say this is quite annoying. he could easily get at
least +5-7% efficiency on each map, me thinks.
#27 2006-12-11 20:15 by lOl_record (87.206.250.XXX)
*<|:-)
#28 2006-12-11 20:30 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
#25 lol, well if he had a choice he wouldnt play with
50-80ms each game now would he?
"like he had a choice about pings"
what kind of comment is that? you are only impliyng that IF
he had a choice he would have had lower ping and thus played
better?
i still think he showed all the pingwhiners that good ping
is not all you need to play well
#29 2006-12-11 20:39 by niomic (192.89.233.XXX)
Insane, eventhough a great and experienced player, has the
added bonus of the really solid teamplay and support that
the current Slackers crew seems to be really good at. With a
less supportive team, I think Insane would not be able to do
as well with such bad ping conditions :(
See you at qhlan :)
#30 2006-12-11 21:18 by lol#28 (193.225.158.XXX)
"i still think he showed all the pingwhiners that good
ping is not all you need to play well" - and what kind
of comment is that?
i dont think "pingwhiners" think that a 12ms
noname player could beat like a 150ms griffin? =>
everyone knows its not the ping that makes someone a skilled
player lol...
#31 2006-12-11 21:44 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)
Bob you forget that if he had stable ping 52 he would have
played different, thats natural. you cant predict how he
would score then
#32 2006-12-11 21:45 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)
anyway outstanding from what he performed with that ping!
#33 2006-12-11 22:17 by Dahmer (213.65.9.XXX)
that was amazingly boring
please ban non-scand so that we can have 25/13ms games
>:(.
If you wanna have a bastard in your team take the ping like
a man!
#34 2006-12-12 02:43 by Bob (85.141.159.XXX)
#33,
1) Ban Finns? They are not Scandis.
2) Only 1 Koff player had to lower his ping.
#35 2006-12-12 03:12 by error (213.114.99.XXX)
Too bad lg didnt spawn on dm3 in the end. Just like ya never
spawns in big room on dm2 sometimes.. :(
#36 2006-12-12 10:31 by c (217.28.193.XXX)
most boring final ever?
#37 2006-12-12 10:32 by Bob (85.141.159.XXX)
#36, just compare it with previous EQL. :)
#38 2006-12-12 18:32 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
#33, then why do alot of ppl still whine about ping if this
is not a issue?
#39 2006-12-12 18:33 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
i meant #30, not #33
#40 2006-12-13 00:03 by avyur (193.225.158.XXX)
#38:ok!
but to make myself clear: i dont really think
"pingwhiners" give a damn about insane's hpb
achievements...this wont make them shut up...
#41 2006-12-13 08:53 by peppe (85.24.208.XXX)
ofc ping doesn't make the player, but it is such a big
difference between 50 and 12 you can't think straight for
the first minutes.
#42 2006-12-13 15:36 by Serox (88.104.189.XXX)
nice games.
for the first time i think the skill level in eql finals has
gone down hill:( not many div0/1 teams playing at the
moment and i think all players at the moment are not at
their best.
#43 2006-12-13 21:11 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
would be nice to se these 8 teams active for a real
showdown: SR, KOFF, FS, LA, CMF, FOM, TVS and last but not
least GTG.
but i guess chances are tiny for that to happen...
#44 2006-12-13 21:47 by HighlandeR (193.219.28.XXX)
np hora, there's no need for all those clans coz soon
they'll have their replacement in div0 -> csn and dc !
#45 2006-12-14 08:33 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
hehe, well that would be div -1, we are just too good for
them and placing us in same div as them would cause heavy
whine about misplaced teams and rape games on their behalf!
:)
#46 2006-12-16 17:37 by com4nder (89.152.2.XXX)
was nice to see sr vs some ex members =8)
#47 2006-12-18 16:55 by Nimfo (213.253.244.XXX)
OMG very nice!
Any demoes around?
#48 2006-12-19 11:15 by billy (193.25.3.XXX)
karol czy ty aby nie przesadzasz? :(((((
#49 2007-01-29 22:10 by Phil (38.139.8.XXX)
Demos?!?!?!
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.