.: Played Games
Playoff Division 5Def2 vs Clan Cube Squad1 - 3
Playoff Division 3hippushnik vs Rebellion of Thunder3 - 1
Playoff Division 1koff vs Slackers0 - 3
Playoff Division 3Easy To Kill vs Rebellion of Thunder2 - 3
Playoff Division 1Slackers vs Firing Squad3 - 1
Playoff Division 5Def2 vs Shadow Death3 - 0
Playoff Division 4ChoseN vs Morituri3 - 1
Playoff Division 6sadtroops vs Enemy Quad3 - 0
Playoff Division 5The Pimps vs Clan Cube Squad0 - 3
Playoff Division 1koff vs Suddendeath3 - 0
.: koff vs Slackers
Playoff Division 1Reported: 2006-12-10 21:41Week: 11
.: Played Maps
E1M2 - Castle of the Damned
koff: 151Slackers: 252
594.jpg
DM2 - Claustrophobolis
koff: 127Slackers: 250
595.jpg
DM3 - The Abandoned Base
koff: 161Slackers: 163
596.jpg
.: Comments

#1 2006-12-10 21:45 by Defcon 5 (85.124.4.XXX)

Wow, last Map, I cant say a word. Just watch the demos.

#2 2006-12-10 21:46 by moris (84.42.163.XXX)

qw with sr is like football used to be with germany. 2 teams frag for Yx20mins and sr win :) gratz, even tho i wanted a 5map final match :P

#3 2006-12-10 21:47 by Bobby (85.140.196.XXX)

Very nice, esp. dm3.
No slowspawning against SR!

#4 2006-12-10 22:27 by FlePser (80.60.182.XXX)

gratz ladies. =)

#5 2006-12-10 22:30 by hfg (213.216.199.XXX)

so sad =()

#6 2006-12-10 22:31 by ^ cpe (145.97.236.XXX)

castle of insane :<

#7 2006-12-10 22:41 by rwx (81.231.242.XXX)

sr suger

#8 2006-12-10 22:56 by Gamer (193.166.235.XXX)

gg sr, you deserve the win. Very impressive by insane on e1m2

#9 2006-12-10 23:06 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

wtf, this game has to be uploaded again.. defcon 5 stole my f?rst comment :( give it to me! grrr

#10 2006-12-11 00:12 by Grass (85.156.250.XXX)

koff oli paska :( bg miss? myllyt?

#11 2006-12-11 03:47 by plast (83.13.196.XXX)

fixed, especially dm3
;E

#12 2006-12-11 06:28 by upkeep (81.224.219.XXX)

wtf happend? some sr spawns?

#13 2006-12-11 06:44 by Anza (84.250.0.XXX)

SR misplaced?????

#14 2006-12-11 08:18 by stall (83.25.86.XXX)

Nice Insane. Own with 77 ms

#15 2006-12-11 09:29 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)

insane shows all u pingwhiners how its done..

a bit boring with 3-0 tho
gl next season

#16 2006-12-11 10:26 by stv (62.112.220.XXX)

SR o/

#17 2006-12-11 11:54 by Flamer (88.100.21.XXX)

Yeah Hooray, kurwa guys are so good with those bad pings...

#18 2006-12-11 12:02 by krab (193.41.215.XXX)

Great Game !

#19 2006-12-11 12:43 by mushi (62.48.251.XXX)

seems ggs, nice insane!

#20 2006-12-11 13:36 by jebak (217.11.252.XXX)

I will kick your head out of your body, moris !

#21 2006-12-11 14:24 by tacobigcreen (85.225.142.XXX)

This is a summary of yesterday nights bigscreen commentary @ molecules own tacobar: ggs, nice played slackerinen. expected more out of koff here, but the very strategic mapchoice from SR broke the nerves. first dm2 as the icebreaker - koff were too nervous to win the map as they normally would've (SR-strat #1). secondly e1m2 coz this is koff's weakest map, so the gap 0-2 would be stressing (SR-strat #2). dm3 - whatta thriller! ppl just couldn't sit down in our specroom, intensive! Congrats sr!

#22 2006-12-11 15:35 by mogge (81.234.255.XXX)

I was hoping for KOFF to win but SR stole it this time. An impressive season for KOFF anyway, think they did a good job. Well played :I

#23 2006-12-11 17:37 by unex (194.151.88.XXX)

@#21 e1m2 koff's weakest map? lol...

#24 2006-12-11 18:15 by murdoc (84.245.9.XXX)

ggs, thx guys! e1m2 always turns around the other way normally cuz its our worst map! but somehow it went better then expected

#25 2006-12-11 18:59 by too much praise (193.225.158.XXX)

i think you are a bit overrating insane's performance. true he played well, but i dont think it would have been a bigger rape, had he been playing with 52ms...
"insane shows all u pingwhiners how its done.." like he had a choice about pings

#26 2006-12-11 19:03 by Bob (85.141.159.XXX)

well, he had not just 70ping, but he had constant lags & pl. i say this is quite annoying. he could easily get at least +5-7% efficiency on each map, me thinks.

#27 2006-12-11 20:15 by lOl_record (87.206.250.XXX)

*<|:-)

#28 2006-12-11 20:30 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)

#25 lol, well if he had a choice he wouldnt play with 50-80ms each game now would he?

"like he had a choice about pings"
what kind of comment is that? you are only impliyng that IF he had a choice he would have had lower ping and thus played better?

i still think he showed all the pingwhiners that good ping is not all you need to play well

#29 2006-12-11 20:39 by niomic (192.89.233.XXX)

Insane, eventhough a great and experienced player, has the added bonus of the really solid teamplay and support that the current Slackers crew seems to be really good at. With a less supportive team, I think Insane would not be able to do as well with such bad ping conditions :(

See you at qhlan :)

#30 2006-12-11 21:18 by lol#28 (193.225.158.XXX)

"i still think he showed all the pingwhiners that good ping is not all you need to play well" - and what kind of comment is that?
i dont think "pingwhiners" think that a 12ms noname player could beat like a 150ms griffin? => everyone knows its not the ping that makes someone a skilled player lol...

#31 2006-12-11 21:44 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)

Bob you forget that if he had stable ping 52 he would have played different, thats natural. you cant predict how he would score then

#32 2006-12-11 21:45 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)

anyway outstanding from what he performed with that ping!

#33 2006-12-11 22:17 by Dahmer (213.65.9.XXX)

that was amazingly boring

please ban non-scand so that we can have 25/13ms games >:(.

If you wanna have a bastard in your team take the ping like a man!

#34 2006-12-12 02:43 by Bob (85.141.159.XXX)

#33,

1) Ban Finns? They are not Scandis.
2) Only 1 Koff player had to lower his ping.

#35 2006-12-12 03:12 by error (213.114.99.XXX)

Too bad lg didnt spawn on dm3 in the end. Just like ya never spawns in big room on dm2 sometimes.. :(

#36 2006-12-12 10:31 by c (217.28.193.XXX)

most boring final ever?

#37 2006-12-12 10:32 by Bob (85.141.159.XXX)

#36, just compare it with previous EQL. :)

#38 2006-12-12 18:32 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)

#33, then why do alot of ppl still whine about ping if this is not a issue?

#39 2006-12-12 18:33 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)

i meant #30, not #33

#40 2006-12-13 00:03 by avyur (193.225.158.XXX)

#38:ok!
but to make myself clear: i dont really think "pingwhiners" give a damn about insane's hpb achievements...this wont make them shut up...

#41 2006-12-13 08:53 by peppe (85.24.208.XXX)

ofc ping doesn't make the player, but it is such a big difference between 50 and 12 you can't think straight for the first minutes.

#42 2006-12-13 15:36 by Serox (88.104.189.XXX)

nice games.

for the first time i think the skill level in eql finals has gone down hill:( not many div0/1 teams playing at the moment and i think all players at the moment are not at their best.

#43 2006-12-13 21:11 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)

would be nice to se these 8 teams active for a real showdown: SR, KOFF, FS, LA, CMF, FOM, TVS and last but not least GTG.

but i guess chances are tiny for that to happen...

#44 2006-12-13 21:47 by HighlandeR (193.219.28.XXX)

np hora, there's no need for all those clans coz soon they'll have their replacement in div0 -> csn and dc !

#45 2006-12-14 08:33 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)

hehe, well that would be div -1, we are just too good for them and placing us in same div as them would cause heavy whine about misplaced teams and rape games on their behalf! :)

#46 2006-12-16 17:37 by com4nder (89.152.2.XXX)

was nice to see sr vs some ex members =8)

#47 2006-12-18 16:55 by Nimfo (213.253.244.XXX)

OMG very nice!
Any demoes around?

#48 2006-12-19 11:15 by billy (193.25.3.XXX)

karol czy ty aby nie przesadzasz? :(((((

#49 2007-01-29 22:10 by Phil (38.139.8.XXX)

Demos?!?!?!


Showing Page 1 of 1
A total of 49 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Verification imageCode from image aboveNameComment
.: Poll
EQL5 should start?
ASAP
When stats is fixed
After NQR10
Created by term on 2007-01-28
Poll list
.: Menu
Content
  • News
  • Forum
  • Players
  • Teams
  • Played Games
  • News archive
  • Admins
  • Signup
  • Rules
Divisions
  • Division 1
  • Division 2
  • Division 3
  • Division 4
  • Division 5
  • Division 6
  • Playoff Division 1
  • Playoff Division 2
  • Playoff Division 3
  • Playoff Division 4
  • Playoff Division 5
  • Playoff Division 6
.: Columns
  • (08 Nov) Hooraytio
  • (30 Sep) Goqsane
  • (28 Sep) razor
  • (19 Sep) Racersnigeln
.: Seasons
  • European Quake League 1
  • European Quake League 2
  • European Quake League 3
  • European Quake League 4
  • European Quake League 5
  • European Quake League 6
  • European Quake League 7
  • European Quake League 8
  • European Quake League 9
  • European Quake League 10
  • European Quake League 11
  • European Quake League 12
  • European Quake League 13
  • European Quake League 14
.: External
    Host
  • Fragzone
    Get Started
  • eQuake
  • Quakeworld Guide
    News & Stuff
  • Quakeworld.nu
  • Quakeworld.ru
  • QWDrama.com
  • Quaddicted
  • Besmella-Quake
  • Quake Brazil
  • Refragged
  • Challenge-TV
  • Quake Servers
  • QW SChedule
    Competitions
  • Duelmania
  • Endif QW Tournament
  • GGL Americup
  • NQR Network
  • 2 shot 2 tournament
If you want to use any material on this site you'll have to contact Åke Vader.
All material on this site is copyrighted and protected by law.