#1 2006-11-14 23:21 by B1aze (89.178.169.XXX)

fourth win! :)

#2 2006-11-14 23:48 by plast (83.30.43.XXX)

ggs, tight

2bad4us ur div1 player could easily rape us @ 39ms while blasp and i had to play with unstable 50-65ms floating to 80-90 in rl shootouts :( no more 21cet eqls @ iop cause it's mistake :<

#3 2006-11-15 08:05 by Eta-bETa (81.229.236.XXX)

Whine detected! :-)

#4 2006-11-15 10:52 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

moltas before the game: "lol, they have one guy with 38 ms!!!!"

looooooool :<

#5 2006-11-15 10:53 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

stop ignoring me plast :(

#6 2006-11-15 11:15 by blsp (87.207.121.XXX)

ye this game was fucking misunderstandig, i will never ffs play on 66 ms again, fucking shit, next time lets play in poland with minping 50 fucking retards

#7 2006-11-15 12:13 by serox (195.112.14.XXX)

gg.

#8 2006-11-15 14:11 by TiMMi (84.48.119.XXX)

To me, the ping looks pretty even from the screenshot. I guess not then?

#9 2006-11-15 14:12 by menth0l (212.68.8.XXX)

you shouldnt whine about the server when your team has the lowest pinging player

#10 2006-11-15 15:46 by moltas (217.210.1.XXX)

i usually don't bother commenting on games here for several reasons (which i'm not going to list) but when people like Hagge just spread lies to make me seem more lame than i actually am i must defend myself. i admit that i made a remark about the pings, BUT that was when they had TWO players at 38 ms (B1aze and unnamed to be exact).

#11 2006-11-15 16:47 by VVD (85.21.75.XXX)

Blaze have ping 51 and 52 on screens.

#12 2006-11-15 16:55 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

I never saw b1aze with 38 ms :(

#13 2006-11-15 17:07 by plast (83.30.32.XXX)

average pings may look even on screenshots but screens dont show two most important things:

1) xn (unnamed) is div1 playing in div2 and vs div2 players @50+ms he got very special additional advantage, and when he plays very good game covering quad/killing enemy rls easily/using lpb shaft etc. then all ussr team play very good cause they can cover other parts of map and play defensive which is easy @50ms, that's quite natural,

2) blasp and i had to reroute through two qizmos, both of them lagged sometimes so our pings were very unstable, i had minimum 52 floating to 80-90 (plus packet loss sometimes), dont know how blasp, but i think very similiar with higher minimal ping, i lost many rls cause of that, couldnt play aggresive (or died when i was trying)

add 1 + 2 and you can get why i say playing 21cet @ iop is mistake, of course dont take it as a grumble cause we agreed to play like that, maybe we just didnt expect its gonna be as bad as it was :( we wanted it to be equal but it surely wasnt and its hard to get it more equal when ussr got 90+ at wargamez (lol)

ggs anyway

#14 2006-11-15 17:15 by moltas (217.210.1.XXX)

sigh... obviously i made that remark (in mm2) before we started to play and B1aze was kind enough to reroute through another qizmo without us even asking 'cause he knew it was the right thing to do since both plast and blsp hade extremely unstable pings floating from anything between 50 to 90 as plast mentioned above. end of discussion.

#15 2006-11-15 19:46 by bagz (87.240.15.XXX)

dont cry plast!!!
so xn in div2 but VALLA in div 2 too :) what problem plast?
why u dont cry when u lost freedom?
i think u r sucker

#16 2006-11-15 19:51 by bagz (87.240.15.XXX)

ah sorry u crying after u lost freedom too
so u r SUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)))

#17 2006-11-15 21:54 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

well plast.. you have moltas on 25 ms so he could just do the same thing for you as xn does for ussr, but actually better since his ping is actually even better than 38.. o/

#18 2006-11-15 22:46 by plast (83.30.32.XXX)

if he could he would

valla is div0 but he's got div3 mates, xn is div1 but he's got div2 mates =)

anyway its kinda different div0@26 ms vs 13 38 40 50 than div1@39 ms vs 26 50 50-90 65-90

and once more, i dont whine (although i could) but i simply point some facts, this is what comments are for aint they

#19 2006-11-16 11:25 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

I thought comments were about accusing people of different things to start the drama we all love B<

#20 2006-11-16 11:31 by gibbs (212.113.204.XXX)

ser is still a div 1 player imo... it does suck about polish pings at peak times tho... you could come to UK plast we have loads of polish people here!

#21 2006-11-16 12:27 by dje (130.235.87.XXX)

i love the fact that plast whines about xn's 39 ms (he didn't even topfrag on dm3 wtf lol?) when moltas has 25. also plast: you can't expect people to play at 23+ CET like you want to. scandinavians tend to have jobs you know :(

#22 2006-11-16 15:06 by plast (83.30.3.XXX)

in poland almost only unqualified workers get up at 5 AM to work, it's inhuman hour and i really feel sorry for you if you must get up so early

anyway that particular game had to be played on weekday and cause russia is CET+2 we couldnt expect to play it 23CET (01 AM in russia), but 6 out of 8 our games so far were played at 23CET cause we always give the choice of a day to opponent so they may pick the day that suits them to play late, i think that's most reasonable option

of course there still are people who get up 5 AM every day besides sat/sun but they dont play on fri/sat cause they drink then, sad life working early/drinking on weekends all the time for whole year but whatever =)

#23 2006-11-16 16:39 by serox (195.112.14.XXX)

was a hard game, harder than i thought it would be. i really could not get into it at all. every thing was going wrong for me and i played like shit doing some bad mistakes.

#24 2006-11-16 19:45 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

maybe ur getting old serox? :)

#25 2006-11-16 22:39 by serox (195.112.14.XXX)

i am 26 next weekend:/

#26 2006-11-17 12:49 by gibbs (212.113.204.XXX)

ser you old timer! im only 23! :x

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Code from image aboveNameComment