#1 2006-09-27 03:49 by plast (83.30.35.XXX)

ggs, close e1m2

<]SR[murdoc> freedom has been losing almost of there prac games
<]SR[murdoc> so ppl should just stop whining all the time
<]SR[murdoc> if you can't beat freedom then you shouldn't even be in div2

:)

#2 2006-09-27 04:36 by Jenna15 (62.142.245.XXX)

Haha.. almighty murdoc :D::D:D:DD and ggs valla@div2

#3 2006-09-27 05:09 by znappe (213.114.242.XXX)

valla started his fame in freedom and will continue his fame in the clan as well even though i will steal most of the glory by my outstanding performances!

#4 2006-09-27 05:17 by znappe (213.114.242.XXX)

just too bad i was idle 19 mins of e1m2.. just managed to gather 29 frags in 1 min :/

#5 2006-09-27 10:07 by TiMMi (84.48.119.XXX)

He's no match for the allmighty TCO!

#6 2006-09-27 11:24 by Dahmer (213.65.9.XXX)

Would be stupid to put a div2 clan in div1 just because of one player. We sure as hell don't play div1 tp and it would also force us to play every single game with Valla. SSC is in the same situation as us...div2 clan with a div0 player. Well they lost with 457 frags against Koff. They should be here in div2 with us.

#7 2006-09-27 12:03 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)

u need like 2 div0 or 4 div1 to be in div1 anyway,
im with dahmer on this one; ssc and vets are div2 clans as well as freedom...

#8 2006-09-27 12:43 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

well freedom also has div0-dahmer :E

#9 2006-09-27 12:44 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

btw, watch out for oblivion now.. this was just a shitty and rusty game, but now that we got 3 people back on good ping (me, dje and pepin) we will rule the world mwhaha :D

#10 2006-09-27 12:45 by Dahmer (213.65.9.XXX)

div0 2on2 dm2 yes! div4 4on4 dm3/e1m2

#11 2006-09-27 13:19 by Babel (212.214.216.XXX)

So how many clans do you guys want in div1 then? 6? and more then double in div2? Kinda boring then. Or what if there were 2 clans that were outstanding and crushed every single clans, should only these two be playing in div1 then?

#12 2006-09-27 14:16 by znappe (213.114.242.XXX)

we said from the beginning that we could play in div1 if they moved like 5 clans from div2 and made div1 a 13-14team division.. but with the current structure of the division we certainly dont fit in there. atleast not this season

#13 2006-09-27 14:24 by ?ke Vader (193.10.211.XXX)

I hope we'll see division 1 consisting of 20 teams next season, that's the only right thing to do imo if we don't want to keep it as boring as it is atm.

#14 2006-09-27 14:43 by ?ke Vader (193.10.211.XXX)

"Or what if there were 2 clans that were outstanding and crushed every single clans, should only these two be playing in div1 then?"

I guess that's where we're heading the next few years.

#15 2006-09-27 14:58 by nas (83.226.240.XXX)

well, well.. at first i want to say GG Freedom, Gr8 game. Dm3 is not so much to talk about, u guys had control in 17min or something.. we managed to get some control in the end. e1m2 in other case were a thriller, that map shows that freedom is a div2 clan, like the rest of us :), and if we would have played dm2 i guess it would have been a realy close game aswell. And some comments about this div1/div2 "issue". Veterans and Dead Rabbits DO NOT belong in div1 _imo_. SSC is stuck between 1 and 2 but i guess it would be more fun for them to play in div2, and that goes for Freedom as well. GL to u all in this league, and BG SASSA!

#16 2006-09-27 15:04 by znappe (213.114.242.XXX)

my 29 frags totally won the e1m2! and yes it was a great game :p think we got the lead for the first time in the game with 3 mins to go or something :p gl in the future oblivions!

#17 2006-09-27 15:33 by Dahmer (213.65.9.XXX)

The reason i refuse to play in div1 is because there's 5-6 clans that can't be beaten without praccing 24/7 for 2 years.

Div1 should really be top6 div2 and bottom6 div1. That would be the most intresting...let the superclans battle it out in semi finals right away :)

And even if div1 was 20 teams there's "those" games that are absolute snoozers

#18 2006-09-27 17:21 by ok98 (81.231.237.XXX)

I dont know but i think div1 is great the way is is or would be even beter with 3-4 clans more. I Think its when u meet the top clans u can learn something an move to another level of the tp. And ssc sure belongs to div1. They beat us in pracs ever now and then. And soon enoung they will take maps of the top clans aswell. And the same with Vets and Rabits. But it would be fun with ~4divs so we can have the top div2 clans in div1 and everyone can play more games.

#19 2006-09-27 18:46 by lib (193.11.40.XXX)

Dahmer: "...and it would also force us to play every single game with Valla".

Funny that, I recall almeida (or znappe, cant recall which of them) replying when asked if you'd ever play a league game without Valla "would you guys play without your best player?".

So basically I'm just saying you're alreayd playing all your games with Valla. It's hardly an argument you can make :)

#20 2006-09-27 19:48 by znappe (213.114.242.XXX)

that statement was made about ZaK though which is a totally different team consisting mostly of newbies. and eql said we would have to play div3 with zak etc etc. offcourse we would have played all games with valla but that's not the case now. personally i dont think will play all games since he is kind of busy with his band and school so... that's not an argument you can use either lib.

#21 2006-09-27 20:13 by almeida (213.113.151.XXX)

whine...

#22 2006-09-27 20:39 by plast (83.30.14.XXX)

"personally i dont think will play all games since he is kind of busy with his band and school"

funny, on sunday you (as clan, i don't recall who exactly) proposed to play eql vs us instead of ls which was delayed more than 40 minutes, i asked if you got valla, you said of coz and you added that you will have him no matter when we play :)

anyway, i was pointing it before season started: if ssc, vets, sd and dr play in div1 then freedom with valla also should, and maybe 2 more top3 eql3 div2 teams, at least these not div0 teams could have more fun in div1 fighting for mid places, not for last 3-4 like it will be now ;) of course that would force admins to move top div3 teams to div2 (striker could play with his div3 team in div2 for ex.), top div4 to div3, etc.

but it's all gone now when season started :)

#23 2006-09-27 21:15 by znappe (213.114.242.XXX)

flintheart said that just to get you to play us! we were bored 8)

#24 2006-09-30 10:23 by mogge (81.233.43.XXX)

Plast said: "..at least these not div0 teams could have more fun in div1 fighting for mid places, not for last 3-4 like it will be now ;)"

Agreed.

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Code from image aboveNameComment