Playoffs Division 2 | Fraggers United vs Segfaulters | 2 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | Quinas vs Boomstick Ownator`s | 3 - 2
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 1 | the Viper Squad vs Druidz | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 2 | Demolition Crew vs Segfaulters | 2 - 3
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | Quinas vs Fallen Angels | 3 - 1
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 2 | Fraggers United vs Apocalypse 2000 | 3 - 2
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | Boomstick Ownator`s vs Comfortably Numb | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 1 | the Viper Squad vs Clan Malfunction | 3 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | Quinas vs Tactical Powerless Amebas | 1 - 0
| ||||||||||||||
Playoffs Division 3 | Boomstick Ownator`s vs In a Blaze | 1 - 0
|
Views: 2608
Pages: 1 | Previous Next | Total of 36 comments | First Last comment first
#1 2009-05-12 23:51 by Zalon (83.89.93.XXX)
2009, and people still doing this :/
#2 2009-05-13 00:38 by record (74.63.107.XXX)
gg phrenic.cfg :D
#3 2009-05-13 00:47 by zapp (213.65.180.XXX)
Sad to see this happen but as with everything it will pass
and hopefully it won't be repeated again.
#4 2009-05-13 07:42 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
lol, stop fooling around in div3 phrenic :E btw, "As the
investigation have shown" - I like it how you call it an
investigation like there actually was a really serious crime
being commited Be
#5 2009-05-13 10:39 by Zalon (87.63.202.XXX)
Hehe, well what word should have been used instead then, if
not investigation? :)
#6 2009-05-13 10:59 by maniaac (95.171.67.XXX)
/nick Sherlock
#7 2009-05-13 12:33 by riosatiy (213.115.175.XXX)
The investigation was made by our Hooraytio Caine.
You can watch it here: http://riosatiy.
se/investigation.png
Joking aside: Really good work admins. Bad work
Bloodpunch(or well the ones involved). You should be ashmed
#8 2009-05-13 13:27 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)
really lame! dont pussy out with the punishment.. half
season ban?? ban them for at least the whole season..
a div1 player that fakes in div3 in playoff?? phrenic :((
#9 2009-05-13 15:34 by Hooraytio (89.160.23.XXX)
#7
I didnt investigate this, only aided in the discussions
after i was told about the matter.
Fakenicks? WTF!
#10 2009-05-13 17:43 by riosatiy (213.115.175.XXX)
I know (or well I didnt) but thought it was funny using your
name (one of the admins)
Hooraytio ~= Horatio("cool" csi dude)
#11 2009-05-13 18:07 by Hooraytio (89.160.23.XXX)
yeah i got the drift :)
i actually nicked horatio before but changed my nick after a
1on1 vs Link
#12 2009-05-13 19:10 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
only a 1on1 against link can do those things to you!
#13 2009-05-13 19:15 by gore (78.105.163.XXX)
phrenic.cfg doesn\'t quite have the same ring to it as
plate.cfg :) but nice work anyway
#14 2009-05-13 21:27 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
plate.cfg? not quite following :(
#15 2009-05-13 23:00 by Hooraytio (89.160.23.XXX)
plate faked for demolition crew and was discovered because
he had exec plate.cfg or the likes in his cmdline
#16 2009-05-14 00:03 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
haha great stuff :)
#17 2009-05-14 10:15 by Recordock Holmes (67.159.1.XXX)
#13 i know that gore, it was a joke :}
now let's investigate Hagge being hidden advertisement of
Haagen-Dazs :P
Be
#18 2009-05-14 22:32 by Darff (80.7.25.XXX)
Why is the guy in the animated version of the investigation
story getting another pair of shades out of his pocket to
put on, when he's already wearing shades?
#19 2009-05-14 23:54 by lib (85.229.251.XXX)
phrenic faking - oh what a shocker.
#20 2009-05-15 10:52 by JohnNy_cz (77.48.143.XXX)
Stickman is idiot, no news there, but phrenic, former NQR
admin?! Dude, that was really pathetic from you, if it
really was you (I still kinda dont believe it).
#21 2009-05-15 11:00 by riosatiy (213.115.175.XXX)
#18 Darff:
If you watched CSI Miami you would totally get that joke :)
#22 2009-05-15 17:20 by 1tsinen (62.241.223.XXX)
For those who think about the "only half season"-thing, btw,
it's summerbreak here inbetween, so the ban ain't 3-4 months
like a normal season is, it's more like 6 months in reality
:F
#23 2009-05-15 18:02 by random noob (62.68.168.XXX)
I want justice. I want blood. Lets execute the 2 involved of
this crime in a publicly. gather the 2 criminal to the
mega-hill area at dm3, and shoot them with a quad rl, while
they have just an axe and 100 hp
#24 2009-05-15 21:00 by lib (85.229.251.XXX)
itsi: yeah, but what is the point of supposedly starting a
ban during a period where there is no league? for all
intents and purposes it's a half season ban, which is a
terribly weak punishment. It's hardly a slap on the wrist
considering what a lame stunt it is faking in a low div
playoff game.
#25 2009-05-15 21:19 by deus (88.74.191.XXX)
pretty fucking gay if you ask me
#26 2009-05-16 08:02 by 1tsinen (217.78.203.XXX)
lib, if it would be longer then we could be sure that the
players wount come back in any form to the qw-scene, and
that is not either what we want. But I guess it depends how
you view this thing. I understand your point but some people
doesn't even want to give a ban so I guess this is something
inbetween.
#27 2009-05-16 15:37 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)
this should really make riker proud, now he has a new bff :E
#28 2009-05-16 18:04 by JohnNy_cz (77.48.143.XXX)
Itsinen: If some fucker stays in QW only thanks to faking in
div3 then who gives a flying fuck if he leaves after being
properly punished??
#29 2009-05-16 20:04 by lib (85.229.251.XXX)
JohNNy put it succinctly. These kind of retards are not an
asset to any sort of scene so who cares if they stop? How
can "yeah well maybe I won't play anymore" be a
leverage-giving response to a suspension?
(and the fact that this response hasn't even been made by
the fakers themselves but rather been made for them by the
admins is even more puzzling)
#30 2009-05-17 08:01 by 1tsinen (217.78.203.XXX)
... and who said that he will only keep on playing if he is
faking in div3?
#31 2009-05-17 08:05 by 1tsinen (217.78.203.XXX)
lib, just keep on reading and thinking it like you want to,
but try to open your eyes and take other things in
consideration which you as a qw spec don't normally need to
:).
And atm the ban is ~6 months, which would be somewhat the
same as if a faker would break the rules in september when
the summerbreaks usually ends.
#32 2009-05-17 16:04 by deus (88.74.186.XXX)
how does it feel for a newly formed clan in a low div to get
it's ass kicked because the other clan is using a high-div
oldschool player that is faking as a noob? ... does sound
pretty damn frustrating to me.
how about taking that into consideration?
admins' job to do something about it or clueless spectators
talk? you decide.
#33 2009-05-18 09:57 by Hooraytio (89.160.23.XXX)
he wasnt faking as a noob tho. Picke has been playing for
some time and would probably have gotten around that amount
of frags anyway
not saying it wasnt lame to fake
#34 2009-05-20 00:37 by fisto (83.233.159.XXX)
I hate fakers!
#35 2009-05-21 09:33 by razor (83.250.103.XXX)
It still says on Bloodpunch page: "This clan has behaved
well in EQL so far."
I wonder what it takes for that comment to change? ;)
#36 2009-05-23 03:14 by phrenic (83.226.37.XXX)
I hate fakers... !
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.