#5 2009-03-23 17:31 by Kwibus (213.46.205.XXX)

ps, since I didnt make that clear.
I don't blame iab a thing.

#4 2009-03-23 12:16 by Otto (130.231.61.XXX)

ggs!

The conditions weren't as equal as they could have been, even if average ping was almost equal throughout the whole game.

I think we played e1m2 better than ever before, especially we got teamwork running fluently. Quinn was securing the YA and others managed to kill enemy RLs and quads.

We are looking forward to meet you at playoffs (without any kind of connection issues!)

#3 2009-03-23 09:47 by rage (88.114.142.XXX)

Hmm, seems like rounds were tight as henri's b-hole! How lame of us to play 4on3, but we will do anything to win!!11111111111 IT'S THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS GODDAMNIT!

#2 2009-03-22 22:54 by maniaac (80.99.97.XXX)

yep, well played ablz, hope for a revenge in the playoffs :)

with fine connection for sure. :)

#1 2009-03-22 22:44 by Kwibus (213.46.205.XXX)

gg in a blaze.

Crappy connection drama game. First we delayed match for like 45 minutes then decided to play anyways which we shouldn't have coz of louse connection issues.

maniac had ping bursts of 300 all the time, but only once we started. So it seemed fine. Then he got an rl and armor and got ping 300... zzz I replaced him first map, but I had to deal with ping 20-50 pl 5-40. Going up and down all the time, not really funny, but somewhat playable.

Our focus was more at replacing dropping players then at the match, but now i'm whining.. yeh I am :)

Again, gg iab :)

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Code from image aboveNameComment