#1 2009-05-18 23:44 by Eta-bETa (81.236.18.XXX)

Hmmmm... Sure missed those games! :\\\

#2 2009-05-19 08:03 by JohnNy_cz (78.128.193.XXX)

A couple of fullstartinen :E

#3 2009-05-19 08:57 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

Yes, real unfortunate starts there :( on dm3 tvs got quad, ring, pent and rl. On dm2 the got both of the rls. Kinda felt like it was sr playing :E

#4 2009-05-19 09:07 by Kwibus (62.41.97.XXX)

ouch:(

It hurts to see CMF get obliterated like this. Makes me cry ...

#5 2009-05-19 10:12 by Hooraytio (89.160.23.XXX)

ggs

gonna be fun to watch the finals

#6 2009-05-19 11:16 by serox (85.118.17.XXX)

TVS are at the highest level any QW team has ever been.

#7 2009-05-19 11:23 by blAze (83.102.10.XXX)

It sure paid off taking a Swede into the team: out of 3 starts, 3 fullstarts. :P

ggs.

#8 2009-05-19 11:32 by marklar (157.24.14.XXX)

our swede can speak finnish so his fullstartpowers were no match for yours, on e1m2 it was just "ei kahta ilman kolmatta" -situation

#9 2009-05-19 11:37 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

serox.. imo the current top-team of all eras has always been at the highest level any QW team has been on since the scene keeps developing forward in skill all the time.

But ye I agree they would prolly beat old teams if they came back today.

Its fun thou to think about some imaginary matchups..
the team that would have the biggest chance i think is maybe a LA coming back and pracing for a while, or FOM.

#10 2009-05-19 11:40 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

in the other hand... if we win the final then that should make US the highest level team!? :)

#11 2009-05-19 12:21 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

that's right razor, so you better start practising! when is the final? sunday plz?

#12 2009-05-19 12:25 by blAze (83.102.10.XXX)

The final is set to start on Sunday 20:30 cet.

#13 2009-05-19 13:02 by finfun (91.156.145.XXX)

Maybe mem should have played in more than 1 map?:( i was hoping a more tighter match between these two but tVS seems to be in monster shape. GL dRZ!! :E:E:E:E:E:E:E:E:E: omg its gonna be a rape.

#14 2009-05-20 12:10 by serox (85.118.17.XXX)

Razor, goodluck:D

You do not get many opportunities against TVS so make use of anything advantages you get:p

Milton is on fire and a machine for quad form start to finish.

#15 2009-05-20 13:03 by finfun (91.156.145.XXX)

Replying to #6. It must seem that tVS is the best qw team EVER but lets not forget that status in div1 right now is not good. tVS has the best players and they prac the most so thats why they are so overpowering. f0m,LA or even Koff would have a very good chance beating tVS if only active. Would be interesting to see tVS vs some kind dreamteam and what would be the outcome.

#16 2009-05-21 15:58 by progamer (193.209.106.XXX)

hahah... tVS isn't even close to old f0m,la,sr,cmf. Too low skill. They would definately end up #5 against those. And easily even lower without XantoM.

#17 2009-05-21 19:21 by glt (83.5.132.XXX)

#16 ...or even closer to Z, FF etc. it doesn't matter what would happen, the fact is tVS are fockin ace right now! why do the most whine come from fakers :/ ?

#18 2009-05-21 20:17 by Hagge (90.225.107.XXX)

those comments probably comes from someone in la or fom that doesn\'t want to face the facts :E

#19 2009-05-21 22:18 by justsaying ;) (91.156.145.XXX)

Facts? Fact is that div1 is fucking pathetic right now. Who's active? TVS is active! Im just so sad to see this scene dominated by one clan. It isnt the same when FF or SR dominated, then the level of div1 was so high and we saw tight and good matches. Its all in the past and yes tVS is fucking ace right now. Hope to see someone ending their reign next season or something.

#20 2009-05-21 22:46 by blAze (94.237.87.XXX)

Hagge nah, according to the ip they're from a fellow finn in a certain city. Not surprising as finns are famous for their jealousy. :)

Also our so called "activity" is mostly an urban legend. If you look at played games at qw stats for example: fifi 518, hlt 708, me 606, milton 926 etc.

As for the above mentioned teams, some of them barely managed to win us when we were playing with lineups not even half as good as now.

#21 2009-05-21 23:06 by nitram (83.226.188.XXX)

There's no reason to respond to the critics blAze, it's the same every year when the activity in the scene drops, same thing happened to us in 2005 when we won everything, people were saying LA, sr whatever would rape us any given day.

People need to realize that without some activity none of the older clans would stand a chance against todays TVS, and besides, it's a privilege that a clan as old as TVS is still playing the game, can't people understand that? Sounds to me like some people see tvs as some newstarted clan that doesnt deserve any of this.

IMO, they deserve it all, great guys, great players. Always a pleasure playing them, even back in the days.

#22 2009-05-21 23:27 by blAzr (94.237.87.XXX)

Hey martin, you're a rare quest in qw scene these days. I hope you're not planning a f0m comeback because Viktor is ours now! :P

And yeah, these x would win y discussions are probably as old as the game itself. :)

#23 2009-05-22 00:10 by stick åt helvete (212.37.117.XXX)

demos?

#24 2009-05-22 10:28 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

well said valla :) i agree.
the winning team should always get credit.. otherwise whats the point..

#25 2009-05-22 12:57 by nitram (131.116.254.XXX)

haha no worries blaze, I don't plan on coming back any time soon tbh, but you never know ;-)

and i'm not sure how likely a fom comeback would be, I'd probably end up somewhere else if I decided to start playing active again.

#26 2009-05-22 13:27 by marklar (84.250.148.XXX)

plz take the whine somewhere else, tvs already admitted they won due to lucky starts!!

btw. 95% of our qw is 2on2 so i wouldnt put that much weight into any stats :)

#27 2009-05-22 16:40 by blAze (94.237.87.XXX)

95% of my qw is pov and mix. :P ca, duel, mix, 2on2, it's all quake.

#28 2009-05-22 17:44 by razor (81.201.222.XXX)

95% of the times i play with keyboard.. plus i havent played since -99

#29 2009-05-22 17:53 by marklar (84.250.148.XXX)

yeah sure, but theoretically you could also say tf and ctf is all quake too :)

by looking at the stats page, you guys all have over 200 rounds of 4on4 whereas ours vary between 31 and 75..

just saying since you brought it up yourself.. not trying to take anything away from your domination the last few years but some perspective should be maintained :)

#30 2009-05-22 22:17 by Hagge (85.24.185.XXX)

I\'m better than you all anyways, if I only had other teammates.... :(

#31 2009-05-22 22:28 by blAze (94.237.87.XXX)

Yeah I play a lot of mixeds (pretty much only form of QW I play besides officials), but does that mean I'm "more active" than someone who plays equal amount of duels or 2on2?

And sure tf and ctf are quake too, and I wouldn't say they're necessarily bad ways to keep your touch. Certainly better than not playing at all I think. :)

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Code from image aboveNameComment