.: Played Games
Playoffs Division 2Magnum 44 vs In a Blaze
0 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-16 Comments: 16 Today: 0
Magnum 44-In a Blaze 132-204 @ DM3
Magnum 44-In a Blaze 78-243 @ DM2
Magnum 44-In a Blaze 0-1 @ E1M2
16
Playoffs Division 2Bad Luck Troopers vs ChoseN
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-13 Comments: 38 Today: 0
Bad Luck Troopers-ChoseN 174-114 @ DM2
Bad Luck Troopers-ChoseN 195-155 @ CMT4
Bad Luck Troopers-ChoseN 190-187 @ E1M2
38
Playoffs Division 2Bad Luck Troopers vs In a Blaze
1 - 0

Game info

Reported: 1970-01-01 Comments: 24 Today: 0
24
Playoffs Division 3Psy vs machinery
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-13 Comments: 28 Today: 0
Psy-machinery 187-85 @ CMT1B
Psy-machinery 171-142 @ DM2
Psy-machinery 247-127 @ DM3
28
Playoffs Division 1Fusion vs Suddendeath
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-12 Comments: 10 Today: 0
Fusion-Suddendeath 301-113 @ DM3
Fusion-Suddendeath 210-214 @ DM2
Fusion-Suddendeath 233-163 @ CMT4
Fusion-Suddendeath 243-234 @ E1M2
10
Playoffs Division 1Slackers vs the Viper Squad
1 - 3

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-11 Comments: 104 Today: 0
Slackers-the Viper Squad 99-266 @ DM3
Slackers-the Viper Squad 114-278 @ CMT1B
Slackers-the Viper Squad 223-184 @ DM2
Slackers-the Viper Squad 159-301 @ CMT4
104
Playoffs Division 3machinery vs ChallengeQuake ProWorld
3 - 0

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-07 Comments: 1 Today: 0
machinery-ChallengeQuake ProWorld 195-91 @ DM2
machinery-ChallengeQuake ProWorld 181-123 @ CMT4
machinery-ChallengeQuake ProWorld 193-67 @ CMT1B
1
Playoffs Division 2ChoseN vs Magnum 44
3 - 1

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-06 Comments: 22 Today: 0
ChoseN-Magnum 44 271-128 @ E1M2
ChoseN-Magnum 44 165-195 @ DM2
ChoseN-Magnum 44 185-136 @ CMT1B
ChoseN-Magnum 44 218-138 @ DM3
22
Playoffs Division 1Slackers vs Suddendeath
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-06 Comments: 42 Today: 0
Slackers-Suddendeath 181-189 @ DM3
Slackers-Suddendeath 229-172 @ DM2
Slackers-Suddendeath 222-138 @ CMT1B
Slackers-Suddendeath 202-257 @ E1M2
Slackers-Suddendeath 311-82 @ CMT4
42
Playoffs Division 3Psy vs Fallen Angels
3 - 2

Game info

Reported: 2010-12-05 Comments: 33 Today: 0
Psy-Fallen Angels 150-164 @ DM3
Psy-Fallen Angels 206-164 @ E1M2
Psy-Fallen Angels 186-126 @ CMT1B
Psy-Fallen Angels 217-225 @ DM2
Psy-Fallen Angels 219-122 @ CMT4
33
.: Upcoming games
No matches have been played so far.
.: Slackers vs the Viper Squad
Playoffs Division 1Reported: 2010-12-11 20:52Week: 11
.: Played Maps
DM3 - The Abandoned Base
Slackers: 99the Viper Squad: 266
396.jpg
Submitted data
zero33
Murdoc25
en_karl22
ParadokS19
Milton79
blAze64
XantoM63
Ihminen60
Map Statistics:
Teams]sr[tvs
Frags99266
Summary

Map: dm3

Date: 2010-12-11 18:16:27 CET

Quads812
Red Armors1438
Yellow Armors2726
Pentagrams13
Taken RLs3027
Killed RLs1925
Dropped RLs1610
Given Damage2365036987

Efficiency awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 78.2 effi

RL Killer awards goes to [tvs][tVS]blAze for 9 killed RLs

Frag Streak awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 42 frags in one streak

Quadrunner awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Ihminen for 6 frags in one Quadrun

Boomsticker awards goes to [tvs][tVS]blAze for 46.8 shotgun percentage

Aimer awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Ihminen and [tvs][tVS]Milton for 20 direct rocket hits

Annihilator awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 10697 given damage


View detailed map statistics



CMT1B - Silverdome
Slackers: 114the Viper Squad: 278
397.jpg
Submitted data
ParadokS45
Murdoc31
zero24
en_karl14
Ihminen75
blAze69
Milton67
XantoM67
Map Statistics:
Teams]sr[tvs
Frags114278
Summary

Map: cmt1b

Date: 2010-12-11 18:43:17 CET

Quads911
Red Armors1836
Yellow Armors2926
Pentagrams13
Taken RLs2826
Killed RLs2025
Dropped RLs1511
Given Damage2574437619

Efficiency awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Ihminen for 76.5 effi

RL Killer awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Ihminen for 11 killed RLs

Frag Streak awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Ihminen for 35 frags in one streak

Quadrunner awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 6 frags in one Quadrun

Boomsticker awards goes to [tvs][tVS]blAze for 41.8 shotgun percentage

Aimer awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Ihminen and [tvs][tVS]Milton for 12 direct rocket hits

Annihilator awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 9796 given damage


View detailed map statistics



DM2 - Claustrophobopolis
Slackers: 223the Viper Squad: 184
398.jpg
Submitted data
Murdoc68
StrikeR59
ParadokS48
zero48
Milton57
blAze47
XantoM43
Ihminen37
Map Statistics:
Teams]sr[tvs
Frags223184
Summary

Map: dm2

Date: 2010-12-11 19:07:08 CET

Quads155
Red Armors4657
Yellow Armors6354
Taken RLs4250
Killed RLs3933
Dropped RLs2824
Given Damage4313639329

Efficiency awards goes to []sr[]. murdoc for 63.6 effi

RL Killer awards goes to []sr[]. murdoc for 17 killed RLs

Frag Streak awards goes to []sr[]. StrikeR for 35 frags in one streak

Quadrunner awards goes to []sr[]. StrikeR for 9 frags in one Quadrun

Boomsticker awards goes to [tvs][tVS]blAze for 46.8 shotgun percentage

Aimer awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 37 direct rocket hits

Annihilator awards goes to []sr[]. murdoc for 12327 given damage


View detailed map statistics



CMT4 - Andromeda Nine
Slackers: 159the Viper Squad: 301
399.jpg
Submitted data
ParadokS50
zero43
Murdoc33
en_karl33
Milton94
XantoM75
blAze74
Ihminen58
Map Statistics:
Teams]sr[tvs
Frags159301
Summary

Map: cmt4

Date:

Quads515
Red Armors2336
Yellow Armors3023
Pentagrams31
Taken RLs4639
Killed RLs3343
Dropped RLs2112
Given Damage3077342774

Efficiency awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 72.9 effi

RL Killer awards goes to []sr[]. ParadokS for 15 killed RLs

Frag Streak awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 32 frags in one streak

Quadrunner awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 10 frags in one Quadrun

Boomsticker awards goes to [tvs][tVS]blAze for 55.4 shotgun percentage

Aimer awards goes to [tvs][tVS]blAze for 19 direct rocket hits

Annihilator awards goes to [tvs][tVS]Milton for 11757 given damage


View detailed map statistics



.: Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3 | Previous Next | Total of 104 comments | First Last comment first

#51 ParadokS - 2010-12-16 16:17 (77.105.214.XXX)
actually we did congratulate you at the end of the finals game, but BEFORE we could do so, milton came with some lame comments which really set the mood and tone of your team.
On top of the other lame shit tvs pulled off i really didn't feel like you earned any congratulatory remarks from us. We acknowledge your position in the scene obviously, and no one disputed the fact that you have had the best team on the scene for a long time - but also had the best lineup that no other teams could match. Just pure player by player. So you have been the favorites every season with your current lineup, and managed to secure most victories. Congratulations with that... or something.
#52 ParadokS - 2010-12-16 16:18 (77.105.214.XXX)
actually we did congratulate you at the end of the finals game, but BEFORE we could do so, milton came with some lame comments which really set the mood and tone of your team.
On top of the other lame shit tvs pulled off i really didn't feel like you earned any congratulatory remarks from us. We acknowledge your position in the scene obviously, and no one disputed the fact that you have had the best team on the scene for a long time - but also had the best lineup that no other teams could match. Just pure player by player. So you have been the favorites every season with your current lineup, and managed to secure most victories. Congratulations with that... or something.
#53 Ihminen - 2010-12-16 16:23 (89.106.44.XXX)
Thank you ParadokS. I wish gl for you guys too in this eql pro and hope there will be tight games!
#54 Ihminen - 2010-12-16 16:25 (89.106.44.XXX)
But i, and i guess the rest of the qwscene, would still like to hear the reason for playing on private server :/
#55 ParadokS - 2010-12-16 16:30 (77.105.214.XXX)
actually, I guess no one gives a crap :)
#56 Ihminen - 2010-12-16 16:33 (89.106.44.XXX)
Is it a secret why you play secretly?
#57 ParadokS - 2010-12-16 16:51 (77.105.214.XXX)
nothing secret about it?
#58 Ihminen - 2010-12-16 16:55 (89.106.44.XXX)
ppl would like to hear the true reason for playing on your private server where others cant spec... if its not a secret?

Was it so that your opponents couldn't see your tactics or something? I dont understand.
#59 ParadokS - 2010-12-16 17:07 (77.105.214.XXX)
I don't need to explain anything to you :)
As I said before also we didn't actually have much prac there, since we didn't have full lineup before the actual finals on the saturday.
#60 Ihminen - 2010-12-16 17:16 (89.106.44.XXX)
You dont have to try to explain
#61 blAze - 2010-12-16 17:22 (94.237.84.XXX)
"On top of the other lame shit tvs pulled off"

Heh so what did we do exactly? We asked our semi opponent to ping up according to the rules (and our right to do so was confirmed by admin) and we made a little joke about your secret server.

But I guess compared to avoiding pracs for years, acting lame about doing so, or actually playing on secret servers and then saying you don't prac, what we did was really lame.

Looks like the best have to be a saint and everyone else gets away with murder. :P
#62 fix - 2010-12-16 17:22 (80.223.142.XXX)
and i got ignored completely , tho its not hard to see why :)
#63 blAze - 2010-12-16 17:28 (94.237.84.XXX)
fix I don't ignore you but you said you will bring some light to this issue later! :)
#64 murdoc - 2010-12-16 17:39 (62.194.153.XXX)
we wanted to do some 7min pracs to get some practice to break your full starts ;)
So we had a private server setup 4-5 days before the final.

Unfortunately kingpin didn't even wanna play 7mins rounds so we ended up playing couple of mix games which we all lost buy the way so nothing fancy about that either.

I've said ggs and congrats on the server and on irc but if you dont find that enough i can repeat myself again here, GGS and Congrats!
#65 blAze - 2010-12-16 17:48 (94.237.84.XXX)
So what you're saying is that you didn't prac in secret the whole summer and fall and that the pracs we see on qw-stats isn't just the tip of the iceberg... I guess we just have to take your word for it then. :)

So ggs, unless fix had something more to add...?
#66 murdoc - 2010-12-16 18:01 (62.194.153.XXX)
You are allowed and ask any opponent to confirm this, and I am sure you will knowing tvs attitude.. but let me help you we only played fusion to save you some time!
#67 blAze - 2010-12-16 18:34 (94.237.84.XXX)
No need, like I said I'll take your word for it.
#68 murdoc - 2010-12-16 18:52 (62.194.153.XXX)
My word indeed!

[17:58:16] <@]SR[ParadokS> [17:54] -> *blaze* qw.foppa.dk:27666 /lastscores, we opened server same week as finals if you wanna know more details :)
[17:58:23] <@]SR[ParadokS> [17:56] Well obviously resetting scores on a server is probably childs play but I believe you :)
[17:58:23] <@]SR[ParadokS> [17:57] <]SR[ParadokS> whatever
[17:58:23] <@]SR[ParadokS> [17:57] <]SR[ParadokS> u want irc logs from forsberg also?
[17:58:23] <@]SR[ParadokS> [17:57] <]SR[ParadokS> it sounds like REALLY important issue for you
[17:58:27] <@]SR[ParadokS> [17:57] no need, I mean they are just text anyway, no way to know if anything was ever really said. you can open notepad and write "logs"
[17:58:27] <@]SR[ParadokS> [17:57] <]SR[ParadokS> haha
#69 blAze - 2010-12-16 19:02 (94.237.84.XXX)
Yeah, I told you both that I believe you and don't need any "evidence".
#70 Rikoll - 2010-12-16 19:07 (84.48.216.XXX)
I will see you hanged, like clotpoles, ere I come any more to your tents: I will keep where there is wit stirring and leave the faction of fools.
#71 crazymac - 2010-12-16 19:32 (89.150.177.XXX)
lol, someones full of it.
#72 pektopah - 2010-12-16 22:43 (82.181.203.XXX)
I find it very interesting what Para said:
"and no one disputed the fact that you have had the best team on the scene for a long time - but also had the best lineup that no other teams could match. Just pure player by player. So you have been the favorites every season with your current lineup, and managed to secure most victories. Congratulations with that... or something."

So, what he's saying is that Tvs has the best players so it's not a real achievement to win with a such a team? It's really hard for me to really understand this since Tvs is not some LA, and players like Blaze, Ihminen and Diki base their succes more on teamplay than personal skill. So I suppose Para means that since SR recruited some div2-3 rising stars they somehow earn it more than Tvs.
#73 murdoc - 2010-12-16 22:59 (62.194.153.XXX)
I think what para is trying to say is that they have had this lineup of 4 great 4on4 players for some time now so they are suppose to win and are favorites in every match.

Of course its a achievement, but does it have the same value as it had some time ago when there where multiple clans playing with 4 top players? No
#74 fix - 2010-12-16 23:22 (80.223.142.XXX)
As it seems i have to earn daves attention here we go:

"i find it kinda funny i find it kinda sad" as after our qhlan final vs ]SR[ (which they lost) daves strong opinion was that lans are for fun only :)

He even went on and write a nice few pages long article about the event itself and how wonderfull it had been, if im not mistaken badly he didnt bother to mention word "cmf" for once :D

Sidenote that he was a active figure of "scene-admins" at the time might add some spice for some readers minds :)

I myself on the other hand would like to consider a lan 4on4 tournament consisting of all its time top teams (tVS excluded) a very "rare goods".

On individual level only hib_of_sr ,striker_of_la and shiva_of_cmf did not participate.


About the "who pracced who when where how many times" thing i dont have anything to say.

But then again the final itself clearly showed how deadly a snikepit can be if you fall to it with head up in your ass.

gg cu next season.
#75 blAze - 2010-12-16 23:52 (94.237.84.XXX)
Heh, I don't get this whine about players at all. I guess it's no surprise that the best clan has the best players. Feels like common sense to me.

And winning a more skilled team in one fluke game is more of an achievement than winning game after game with skill. Does not compute... :S

SR had no "div2-3 rising stars", they're all solid div1 players...

We all take the best players we can get, to claim otherwise is just pure hypocracy.
#76 QW-Fan - 2010-12-17 01:12 (193.167.107.XXX)
#59 Would you mind explaining that to all of us, qw fans and whole scene where did you need that private server? That is probably the most stupid thing ever to play in one and then claim you did't even prac there, why the hell you needed private server then? :P

Looks like SR had too high hopes when coming to eql-finals (because of "fun qhlan gaming tournament") and then losing it almost 0-100 feels too bad for now and that need a loooot of explaining. :/
#77 ParadokS - 2010-12-17 08:06 (77.105.214.XXX)
We didn't need it, we thought it would be fun to prac without a lot of drama up to the finals. We just didn't get a chance to, simple as that. I don't really see the big deal or why it's so interesting of a subject.

And fix, if teams don't even bring best lineups to LAN, how can it really be as serious as online? At least this QHLAN both teams actually HAD all their best players present. In my book that counts for something.

Missing hib for qhlan is like tVS not playing with Milton, I'm sure if they didn't have milton at LAN it wouldn't be the "for fun event" card they would play if they lost 4on4.

Without Hib playing for a serious tournament it's of course easier to say it wasn't as serious as online, even though cMF did do a great job and I perhaps didn't give them enough credit at the time. How will you ever be able to forgive me fix?

tVS is the best clan around now, woopdi dooh, it's actually fairly new phenomenon, only after milton/xantom joined they could really dominate, before that tVS was always reaching for the skies, but never could get beyond 5th floor.

It's not gonna stay the same forever, it never did, it never will.

About having best players, well. Most teams try to get the best players they can get.. obviously, just doesn't mean they get what they want. You got a good deal though.. best player on the scene plus best swedish 4on4 player, from probably the biggest QW scene. top dollar :)

I can understand why are you sitting happy. I'm not complaining much either. Every season is a new challenge, building up and trying to go all the way.

Next seasons will be no different. ses på lan!
#78 Hooraytio - 2010-12-17 10:26 (85.228.244.XXX)
Great stuff to read during coffee break!

thx
#79 Hagge - 2010-12-17 10:34 (212.221.52.XXX)
Who needs a tv anymore? This stuff is far more entertaining 8) Can't Xantom come in and write another comment, so we'll get another 30 comments by lunch time 8)
#80 fix - 2010-12-17 13:57 (80.223.142.XXX)
thanks dave i think u partly took my point there. and i salute you for that.

but then again you manage to see only your teams short comings in the tournament lineups, obviously missing hib at the time is a big hit, but striker and shiva did count for something surely at time too for their own teams.

your replacement at the lan was most unexperienced yes, tho most active of the other two when compared (janne,space)
xamp was 24/7 giving taste of his 50% shaft to anyone who was interested :D

and no im not saying your own final vs tvs dont count for anything, not at all.

blAze: when hib left tVS, he came to talk to us but we turned him down and i told him to contact para, and what do you know 1 day later there was ]sr[hib on the servers. not all the teams try to gather the best possible lineup =)

it was only after his SR spell when he came to us again, and i was fool enough to talk others into taking him in, nothing good came out of it.
#81 blAze - 2010-12-17 14:15 (83.102.10.XXX)
Interesting fix. Actually I completely missed the period in QW where hib apparently enjoyed some kind of legendary status. I think when he was playing for us he was just another good player, but not famous or anything. When I came back to QW, I think he had already moved to Thailand. So what went wrong? He seemed like a nice guy IRL but got angry easily online. :)
#82 Hagge - 2010-12-17 14:56 (212.221.52.XXX)
He was probably not as high as the rest of the cmf guys Be
#83 fix - 2010-12-17 16:14 (80.223.142.XXX)
he was way too serious about everything, same could be said about dag's little visit on our roster.

some dudes are just meant to be on the enemy side :)
#84 Blob - 2010-12-17 16:57 (85.76.32.XXX)
Holy crap, I haven't followed qw-scene for a while, but the flame wars still goes on. No offense para, but can't you just be a good sport about it? I understand it is frustrating that tVS is dominating div0, but still.
#85 ParadokS - 2010-12-17 18:16 (77.105.214.XXX)
He was a bit like Milton. Gave 200% in _EVERY_ game, nomatter who, what, where when. He was very serious about his quaking :)
And I\'m not saying that as a minus, it was a nice attitude that rubbed off on players around him. I looked up to him as a player.

fix: It\'s not about underlining our shortcomings at that lan, but you were missing key players and we were missing _HIB_. Two crippled teams, so yeah, it was good teams fighting, but it was not the epic matchup. But we were happy back then with the event because so many good players showed up. Unfortunately not more ppl showed up at this LAN, but it was compensated with the 2 best teams on the scene at least. I really hope more will show up for next qhlan!
#86 razor - 2010-12-17 20:18 (83.250.102.XXX)
wtf where did my comment go :)
#87 razor - 2010-12-17 20:21 (83.250.102.XXX)
well i'll just write the last part:
What if SR turn it around and say
"we are alot worse online compared to LAN where zero has high ping etc but EQL was just for fun and luckily we won the real championship title on QHLAN"

it just sounds ugly either way.. :)
#88 Chillum - 2010-12-17 23:13 (94.21.149.XXX)
I'll miss Milton and Xantom, they gave us such a lot of good games to spectate. GL champ in real life, i hope u will sux, and come back to qw soon lol. As for the drama SR=QHLan champ, TVS=EQL champ. Or am i too simple? :D
#89 HangTime - 2010-12-17 23:41 (84.45.212.XXX)
Really don't see what the big deal is about playing prac games or tactic runs on 'secret' servers, plenty of clans used to do that in the old days before ASE and widely distributed server lists. Seems to me if you're playing div0 level (i.e. div1 semifinals/final) then if you're going to try out something new you maybe want to hide that from your opponent. I wouldn't know because I've probably played more div1 without ever reaching a semi (REC-LAN excluded) than almost anyone in the scene :)

Interesting point raised by fix regarding hib/dag, I've noticed quite a few weird/shortlived terms at CMF... you know, just good players that joined and didn't seem to play that much/long.... I'm thinking guys like Avenger, Reppie etc

As for the LAN vs EQL debate, obviously whoever wins each one is going to big it up. LAN has the $$$ but EQL has the prestige, I think most people would agree they never play their best on LAN due to physical conditions, it's not like the old days when you'd see only games played online under laggy conditions. That doesn't undermine anyone for winning LAN tourneys it just means I don't think you can turn around and say "yeah we won LAN tourney that means we are #1, screw everything else" (and the converse applies too).
#90 blAze - 2010-12-18 00:03 (94.237.84.XXX)
razor: Well, that's pretty much what they have been saying, except for the sucking online part. Hence this whole discussion...

If someone decides to appreciate a random LAN win more for whatever convenient reason, that's fine by me. Just please don't make things up, put words into our mouths etc.
#91 razor - 2010-12-18 01:07 (83.250.102.XXX)
"random LAN win".. what's that supposed to mean.. i really don't see how EQL is more valuable to win?
Yes it is for fun, but so is EQL? it's not like QHlan is just some fun thing and eql is dead serious?
#92 blAze - 2010-12-18 01:30 (94.237.84.XXX)
For me EQL is more valuable because you put half a year's work into it and you can give your best performance with familiar conditions and no distractions. That has always been my opinion and I haven't changed it depending on my success on LANs. This QH was our best achievement ever on any LAN so we have no reason to be disappointed. I know some people expected us to win every category but in my opinion those people simply dont understand the big difference in lan and online gaming.
#93 blAze - 2010-12-18 02:05 (94.237.84.XXX)
I wrote some thoughts before the LAN on this thread and they're still valid.

http://www.quakeworld.nu/blogs/2231/266/
#94 razor - 2010-12-18 02:25 (83.250.102.XXX)
Ye it is longer period but still I think they are equally prestigous,QHlan also had nice prizemoney.. just because one team feel they didnt play good, for whatever reason, doesn't make it not count as you make it sound like.. maybe you felt like you played bad cause SR played good also.. from a spectators POV SR just played good.
And we played you on the LAN and I also speced your games, I can't say I noticed any difference from playing you online..
So I don't think you should dismiss SR's achievement, and no one should dismiss your EQL win either
#95 fix - 2010-12-18 03:23 (84.251.23.XXX)
HangTime: Avenger has never played for cmf.

What comes to reppies case it was well planned 1 season emergency backup plan.

Old friends gave us a helping hand.
#96 blAze - 2010-12-18 11:29 (94.237.84.XXX)
razor, you are of course entitled to your opinion, but I just don't share it.

For example, I got totally owned by XantoM in povdmm4 at the LAN. That was the first time he has ever won me in it. I am 100% sure that if we'd play a pov now from home I'd beat him without effort. So what happened? Did he become the god of povdmm4 at the LAN, or was I just playing much worse than what I'd play from home? I'm sure if you had specced his playing there, it would have seemed that he is playing good too, because it's always relative to the opponent's play.
#97 blAze - 2010-12-18 11:33 (94.237.84.XXX)
So considering that he won me at LAN should that now have equal value? Should I now think that he is equally good pov player because he happened to win me there? Even though if we go now to play 100 povdmm4s, I will win 100 of them.
#98 Hagge - 2010-12-18 11:52 (188.223.195.XXX)
Now you are talking about aim blAze. Does aim really matter that much in 4on4? 8)
#99 razor - 2010-12-18 14:08 (83.250.102.XXX)
ye but it's one player and it wasn't like you totally sucked in 4on4, or does every tvs player play bad on lan? I just think it's wrong to try and glorify the EQL victory as some sort of final test who is the "real" champion and the QHlan was just "for fun and didnt matter" If we want people to go there we need it to be as prestigous as it can be.. what little left of the prestige there is to win in QW nowadays we need to keep..
If you watch the games QHlan final/EQL final.. SR was like night and day in how they played
#100 razor - 2010-12-18 14:12 (83.250.102.XXX)
they simply played awesome, you got owned 1 game.. what's so bad with that,.. it's good for community :)
but you still are the overall best in most eyes

Showing Page 2 of 3
A total of 104 comments
Previous Next
Page: 1, 2, 3

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Verification imageCode from image aboveNameComment
.: Poll
There are no polls.
Poll list
.: Menu
Content
  • News
  • Forum
  • Players
  • Teams
  • Played Games
  • Statistics - Frags
  • Statistics - Maps
  • News archive
  • Admins
  • Rules
Divisions
  • Division 1
  • Division 2
  • Division 3
  • Playoffs Division 1
  • Playoffs Division 2
  • Playoffs Division 3
.: Columns
  • (04 Nov) Hooraytio
.: Seasons
  • European Quake League 1
  • European Quake League 2
  • European Quake League 3
  • European Quake League 4
  • European Quake League 5
  • European Quake League 6
  • European Quake League 7
  • European Quake League 8
  • European Quake League 9
  • European Quake League 10
  • European Quake League 11
  • European Quake League 12
  • European Quake League 13
  • European Quake League 14
.: External
    Get Started
  • nQuake
    News & Stuff
  • Quakeworld.nu
  • Quakeworld.ru
  • Quaddicted
  • Besmella-Quake
  • Challenge-TV
  • Quake Servers
  • Goldrush (betting)
    Tournaments
  • Ownage Duel Tournament
  • QuakeWorld Duel League
Additional work done by PreMorteM and Zalon.
If you want to use any material on this site you'll have to contact Åke Vader.
All material on this site is copyrighted and protected by law.