#1 2006-04-04 00:37 by sassa (213.113.96.XXX)

warning for jugs, adamka?!?!?
fix your nicks

#2 2006-04-04 00:43 by spokz (81.168.155.XXX)

LOL who are these ppl from jugs ??
first time i see these nicks and im surprised they took dc so ez :( especially that they won dm2..
kinda strange

#3 2006-04-04 00:51 by stv (62.68.181.XXX)

paranoids..

#4 2006-04-04 00:52 by lord (87.207.215.XXX)

maybe they are undercover paranoids :(

#5 2006-04-04 00:52 by lord (87.207.215.XXX)

stv 2 fast :(

#6 2006-04-04 01:04 by sassa (213.113.96.XXX)

we knew that they were paranoids..
24 frag win on dm2 isnt eazy, but yeah, dm3 was quite eaz

#7 2006-04-04 01:34 by HighlandeR (83.20.243.XXX)

dm2 ended with a draw in regular time (130:130 afair)
we had the lead but couldnt keep it.

dm3 was a classic rape after a classic fullstart, they had first rl, penta, quad and locked the map quickly.
we didnt have too many ideas of how to brake it, didnt even try too much in the end.

ggs.
even thou our performance was pretty weak, jugs did a pretty good job here.

#8 2006-04-04 02:09 by [dc]panczo (87.105.250.XXX)

no more so strange dc-lineup

#9 2006-04-04 07:58 by balintka (84.0.181.XXX)

Thanks for the solid games DC, no whine no bs. Refreshing return to the qw after the (long) break...

Dm2 was thrilling, nice adrenaline rush around 19:50 mark :)
Dm3, well what highlander already said tho the start only depends on the secret combo which of course we wont tell otherwise it wouldnt be secret o_O.

and for sassa: adamka = adika sorry we try to remember our names ;)

#10 2006-04-04 08:05 by [DC] - pool (87.207.12.XXX)

kurwa :(

#11 2006-04-04 12:56 by EnginEEr (195.56.230.XXX)

grats

#12 2006-04-04 13:56 by JOKE (81.182.21.XXX)

OMG !!!!!! ROCKET JUMP SCRIPT DETECTED
POV petike:
demo_jump 7:15
demo_jump 18:50
demo_jump 19:55
POV adamka:
demo_jump 5:15
http://www.challenge-tv.com/index.php?mode=d emodetail&demo=31091

#13 2006-04-04 13:58 by JOKE (81.182.21.XXX)

the correct link is:
http://www.challenge-tv.com/index.p hp?mode=demodetail&demo=31091&dl=2

#14 2006-04-04 14:00 by JOKE (81.182.21.XXX)

damn.....lol
http://www.challenge-tv.com/index.p hp?mode=demodetail&demo=31091&dl=2

#15 2006-04-04 14:02 by JOKE (81.182.21.XXX)

lol : http://www.challenge-tv.com/index.p hp?mode=demodetail&demo=31091&dl=2

#16 2006-04-04 14:04 by unstar (85.238.77.XXX)

OMG! A ROCKETJUMP SCRIPT??????????????????????? :DDD

#17 2006-04-04 14:06 by stv (62.68.181.XXX)

JESUS!! ROCKETJUMP SCRIPT!!!

#18 2006-04-04 15:08 by HighlandeR (150.254.194.XXX)

doh, rj, who cares ?:D

#19 2006-04-04 16:27 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)

shouldn't realnicks be in brackets? :(

#20 2006-04-04 17:33 by [dc]panczo (87.105.250.XXX)

OMG is this real rj script :o

#21 2006-04-04 17:54 by JOKE (81.182.21.XXX)

Scripting:

EQL does not allow any movement scripting, such as kfjump or selfbuilt rocketjumping.
--------------
admins??

#22 2006-04-04 18:15 by [DC] - pool (87.207.12.XXX)

rj script - who cares ? gg jugs!!!

#23 2006-04-04 20:44 by Term (85.226.178.XXX)

Were not gonna disqualify JUGS yet :/. They obviously have not read the rules and two warnings, ie disqualification, after the first match seems a bit hard.

#24 2006-04-04 20:51 by HighlandeR (83.20.194.XXX)

disqualification for useing a bit different nick then registered and harmless rj scripts would be joke.

#25 2006-04-04 21:47 by gaz (84.12.75.XXX)

So is this milamber, zero etc?

#26 2006-04-04 21:49 by balintka (84.2.214.XXX)

thanks for the nice attitude dc <3 and wise decision from admins... thanks! :)

alneves baratom neked meg legjobbakat remelem ez a legnagyobb orom az eletedben.

#27 2006-04-04 22:21 by tGM (85.226.69.XXX)

So it's okay to not bother reading the rules as long as it's the first game (note it is not the first week).

#28 2006-04-04 23:10 by OrioN (80.98.63.XXX)

But the first match :)

#29 2006-04-05 00:56 by [dc]panczo (87.105.250.XXX)

JUGS virgin game

#30 2006-04-05 01:37 by Term (85.226.178.XXX)

tGM: well the idea is that youre suppose to be extra carefull to not break the rules after the first warning, ie that teams will have a second chance if they made a misstake. The fact that this is the first EQL match ever for team JUGS makes us feel that the might deserve that second chance even tho they broke two rules in the same game.

#31 2006-04-05 10:03 by Hooraytio (193.10.229.XXX)

another fakenick clan
its so nice :/

#32 2006-04-05 11:17 by gaz (195.72.182.XXX)

So is this milamber, zero etc?

#33 2006-04-05 14:46 by vickers (62.201.86.XXX)

yes, the're milamber, zero and so on. Nice to have them back.

*****

Ti meg ne csaljatok m?r b+, nem l?tezik hogy 10 ?ve j?ccotok ?s ilyen szaros kis rj-t nem tudtok megcsin?lni. ;)

#34 2006-04-05 22:35 by Ari (84.251.171.XXX)

Hang'em and then torch their bodies and spill some ParadokS's urine on them. :E:E:E:E:E:EE:

#35 2006-04-06 19:02 by kress (80.98.65.XXX)

szerinted 2ev utan a 2. game-n mennyire jott reflexbol az rj? :)

Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.

Code from image aboveNameComment