Playoff Division 2 | Satanic Slaughter Clan vs El?intarha | 3 - 0 |
Playoff Division 4 | BaconMen vs defs | 0 - 3 |
Playoff Division 1 | LegeArtis vs Slackers | 0 - 3 |
Playoff Division 5 | The Gibbers vs Zundbyberg aZZ KickerZ | 3 - 0 |
Playoff Division 4 | Apocalypse 2000 (Squad 2) vs BaconMen | 0 - 3 |
Playoff Division 2 | Satanic Slaughter Clan vs Tribe of Tjernobyl | 3 - 2 |
Playoff Division 4 | defs vs NoNaMe | 3 - 0 |
Playoff Division 4 | BaconMen vs Da Quaking Manjakks | 2 - 0 |
Playoff Division 2 | El?intarha vs osams | 3 - 1 |
Playoff Division 4 | Morituri vs NoNaMe | 0 - 2 |
#1 2006-06-05 16:10 by mli (213.216.199.XXX)
:(
#2 2006-06-05 16:18 by flinty (83.249.207.XXX)
gg
#3 2006-06-05 16:21 by Seni (88.112.29.XXX)
Omg so hot action by Dave and the boys. Demos? Ps. where
were flood-finnepinne-cam ?
#4 2006-06-05 16:28 by n1 (81.182.174.XXX)
bg sr
It seems they chikened out...taking the glory without doing
anything at all is lame. I wouldnt care about la not getting
any players to the scheduled time (even if its the 3rd!), i
would wait for them and fight for the glory! SR chickened
out and got a title which they didnt deserve. This is the
hard truth.
totally no respect...
#5 2006-06-05 16:29 by -insane- (83.27.152.XXX)
Ye we didnt deserve it, hint: check division 1 table and
tell me who finished first in group games.
#6 2006-06-05 16:32 by gg (81.182.174.XXX)
ye LA didnt deserve to be in the finals too, hint: who won
the only div1semifinal played and who finished second in the
division1 table.
#7 2006-06-05 16:35 by -insane- (83.27.152.XXX)
They finished 3rd soz mate B<
#8 2006-06-05 16:40 by m8 (81.182.174.XXX)
I was referring to the fact that even if f0m finished second
in the table, they got stomped by LA in the semifinals, thus
LA earned his place fair enough in the finals.
#9 2006-06-05 16:40 by HighlandeR (150.254.194.XXX)
#6: as you mentioned: 'who finished *second*"
#4: totally disagree, it's a lack of respect given to SR
with not being able to play on tiwce scheduled date.
it's a bg when 2 out of 3 playoff games end with WO. But
it's not SR fault at all.
#10 2006-06-05 16:42 by -insane- (83.27.152.XXX)
Ofc its not we`ve been ready to play EVERY game we even
tried to play our group game with la (they werent
interested). Its just stupid SR hate in those comments. Btw
are you afraid of reveal your nick mr anonymous ?
#11 2006-06-05 16:45 by moris (146.102.98.XXX)
zzz. too bad the other semifinalist didnt get to play or
sth. wo's in finals suck. but the truth is, la/ff have quite
some experience in giving wo's in league finals
#12 2006-06-05 16:46 by marklar (193.229.162.XXX)
I think sr was rightfully crowned this season. You can argue
if they were the best team or not, but they were the most
active and had serious commitment to practicing and playing
in general. I much rather have a champion like sr instead of
a team that plays once every three weeks. It's nice to see
hard work pay off, congrats sr.
#13 2006-06-05 16:48 by m8 (81.182.174.XXX)
#9: we all know groupgames doesn't mean shit. What are
playoffs for then?
As for not being sr's fault, well that's not entierly true,
since they chose the easy path rather than the actual fight
for the glory (yes even by rescheduling it for the 4th time
if they must)!
#14 2006-06-05 16:52 by -insane- (83.27.152.XXX)
Well mr #13 you`re the one who say sr didnt deserve to win.
Since you cant base on the playoffs (2 wo`s not from our
fault) you can only verify it according to regular season
which we finished first. More of that the only clan we`ve
lost to this year in official game is cmf so please stop
that crap.
#15 2006-06-05 16:57 by ParadokS (212.242.210.XXX)
#13: How about a 5th, or a 10th reschedule?
Allowing LegeArtis to schedule 100% on their terms - and
then they don't even have the curtesy to show up is just a
declaration of surrender. They don't care about the league,
or have any respect for the other participating teams.
For me that is the most sad part. That 1 team is allowed to
reduce a whole season to nothing but a bad memory.
On this point I agree with zanne, who wanted a new season
with pricemoney, to induce incentitive in division 1 for
playing more games and giving some respect to the people
involved.
We already offered to play the other semifinalists in the
finals but the admins decided to end the season as is.
We looked forward to play LegeArtis in a final, but we do
not wish to do so at any cost. The outcome of this season is
solely caused by LegeArtis.
#16 2006-06-05 17:29 by gaz (195.72.182.XXX)
All those saying that SR didn't deserve to win are talking
bollocks.
Check the result - 3-0 and 100-0 on all maps. That's a hell
of an easy victory and you can't say that they didn't
deserve to win - if you win by that much then it can't be
all luck.
Congrats on a noble victory Slackers! May your popularity
and commitment to making QW a fun pasttime rather than a
serious e-sport continue!
#17 2006-06-05 17:41 by m8 (81.182.124.XXX)
And there you have it! Allowing LA another chance AND show
them how qw is done by owning them would make you as happy
as ever, not to mention the fans (well you have nothing to
be afraid of since you finished first in the division1
table, as you have reminded everyone countless times).
#18 2006-06-05 17:41 by *showing (81.182.124.XXX)
.
#19 2006-06-05 17:51 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)
Yeah sorry guys we were afraid for them. that they wouldnt
dare to play us in the finals and always being toyed around
sorry for that
#20 2006-06-05 17:53 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)
And yeah I know my english you can mention all about it but
we really wanted to play this game and not win it by this
#21 2006-06-05 18:03 by murdoc (213.84.248.XXX)
This is a really sad end for a great season. Hope eql4 and
the prizemoney will get some more balls to the la
players.
See ya next season. Have a good summer :)
#22 2006-06-05 18:31 by xachariah (193.136.128.XXX)
bg la :/
#23 2006-06-05 19:14 by peppe (82.212.77.XXX)
bg div1 :/
#24 2006-06-05 19:56 by Tuna (212.202.40.XXX)
and imagine the whine when there is prize money next season.
wow!
#25 2006-06-05 20:03 by -insane- (83.27.152.XXX)
At least the games will actually get played Tuna :)
#26 2006-06-05 20:38 by Gamer (193.166.235.XXX)
a deserved win for sr. Too bad that it had to be a walkover.
I think the regular season should have been a few weeks
shorter (or started earlier). It feels like half of the
players aren't playing at all in summer. Anyway, congrats sr
<3
#27 2006-06-06 09:29 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)
lol.. always nice to see a pathetic faker defending la..
don't you have anything better to do?
this was a well deserved victory for sr since this season
was ruined by clans like la and cmf's wo's.. sure if they
would've wanted to play the game I'm quite sure they
could've won it, but when they don't even want to play it's
quite unfair to whine on sr? whine on la instead.. (and cmf)
zzz
#28 2006-06-06 09:52 by marklar (193.229.162.XXX)
fuck you hagge, our wo was just as much sr's fault as it was
ours, anguas connection is crap until 23 and they couldnt
play after that
#29 2006-06-06 10:32 by Eta-bETa (81.227.182.XXX)
Just don't listen to the faker. It's the same as with a
child. If noone listens to him, he will get very very angry
and then stop. Alternatively hushed by his mother.
#30 2006-06-06 11:22 by znappe (213.114.242.XXX)
not that surprising with a wo-win between two gayclans eeh
#31 2006-06-06 11:31 by Kola (212.214.245.XXX)
Its just aggravating to see ppl complaining on SR when LA
shows up such an arrogant attitude to both the scene and the
game. They should be playing in div 2 next season as a
punishment and the W.O was the only way when there is only
one team that has the guts to play.
The only sad part is that the retarded LA team didnt give
W.O in the semis instead, coz then we would have a final and
a worthy ending to the season, wich they have now robbed us
from.
#32 2006-06-06 12:08 by xachariah (193.136.128.XXX)
heh, punishment for who kola? the other div2 clans? :x
#33 2006-06-06 13:14 by error (213.114.99.XXX)
I agree with Kola. If you dont intend to play the final,
give wo in the semi. FWIW though, I hear LA have players
today.
#34 2006-06-06 13:59 by jens (81.182.123.XXX)
I think there is no point playing the final against the
third best team. But in my opinion LA never had the
intention to skip the finals.
#35 2006-06-06 14:44 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
its better to play even if you have to wait a few
days/weeks
still SR were the best team this season anyway and they
played alot too, something that LA havent done in a long
time now (do you guys ever prac in la?)
#36 2006-06-06 14:47 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)
Really some of you are naive...
Its pretty annoying you know to read this by just judging on
results.... to naive
#37 2006-06-06 14:54 by dragon (62.177.247.XXX)
Sorry, The thing is you see W.O. and you come to the
conclussion we didn't intended to play this game in the
first place ( if you want more info talk to us private irc )
. You should know we aren't also happy with these results.
If i read your comments you make me think that you are my
age or maybe younger then me.. thats pretty bad if you ask
me from some of you that is.
#38 2006-06-06 15:03 by murdoc (213.84.248.XXX)
The problem is that its not only the finale that have been
rescheduled 3 TIMES. But the group game wasn't played either
after couple of weeks of asking, we refused to take w.o.
back then cuz else they would get kicked out. That would be
a shame for the playoffs, now we regreat that we didn't. We
had rather played vs koff/tvs instead.
#39 2006-06-06 15:04 by murdoc (213.84.248.XXX)
regret*
#40 2006-06-06 16:59 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
dragon my lover why so upset?
everyone is entitled to their own opinion
i do not doubt that sr wanted to play this game, otherwise
sr would have taken wo after the 2nd delay...
im just saying its sad that we didnt see it played and it
looks like this time it was mostly la's fault?
for the upcoming season i urge _all_ clans to think through
if you are willing to put in that 1-2 games per week that
this game requires.
if not, then DONT signup...
#41 2006-06-06 17:21 by -insane- (83.27.158.XXX)
yea as Danny stated before we didnt take w.o. vs La in group
games (and we could`ve done that) just because La would get
kicked from Eql then and now we get all that crap. That`s
just pathetic...
#42 2006-06-06 18:58 by Hooraytio (212.214.218.XXX)
true
#43 2006-06-06 19:03 by Hagge (83.233.145.XXX)
whine marklar.. then replace him by one of the 1935835
players you have in your clan.. :/
don't say all the crap insane.. I have nothing else than
love for you Be <3
#44 2006-06-06 19:27 by -insane- (83.27.158.XXX)
<3 hagegi ;<
#45 2006-06-06 20:01 by ui (81.234.12.XXX)
I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS.
Q W I S D E A D.
#46 2006-06-06 20:51 by nylon (81.173.231.XXX)
o?_(
#47 2006-06-06 21:01 by vickers (213.178.102.XXX)
:/
#48 2006-06-06 21:53 by angua (82.182.32.XXX)
Hagge, then sr could have replaced murdoc with one of the
99999999 members in their clan... just die hagge.
#49 2006-06-06 22:24 by murdoc (213.84.248.XXX)
why me? :-[
this is not about cmf-sr but about la lames behaviour cmf
only showed good sportmanship
#50 2006-06-06 22:26 by angua (82.182.32.XXX)
hehe murdoc, just rumours that it was you who couldn't play
after 23..
Note
On this site we log the IP of all users who post comments on matches/articles.